Advertisement

Language and Social Interaction

  • Douglas W. Maynard
  • Anssi Peräkylä
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Keywords

Discourse Analysis American Sociological Review Interaction Order Conversation Analysis Illocutionary Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1992). Topic transitiions in physician-patient interviews: Power, gender, and discourse change. Language in Society, 21, 409–426.Google Scholar
  2. Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Antaki, C, & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arminen, I. (Forthcoming). Institutional interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong, D. (1983). Political anatomy of the body. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  8. Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Austin, J. L. (1961). Philosophical papers. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Baugh, J. (1999). Out of the mouths of slaves. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bergmann, J. R. (1993). Discreet indiscretions: The social organization of gossip (J. John Bednarz, Trans.). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  13. Bernstein, B. (1961). Social structure, language and learning. Educational Research, 3, 163–176.Google Scholar
  14. Bernstein, B. (1972). A sociolinguistic approach to socialization: With some reference to educability. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 465–511). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  15. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  17. Boden, D. (1990). People are talking: Conversation analysis and symbolic interaction. In H. Becker & M. McCall (Eds.), Symbolic interaction and cultural studies (pp. 244–273). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Breitborde, L. B. (1983). Levels of analysis in sociolinguistic explanation: Bilingual code switching, social relations, and domain theory. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 39, 5–43.Google Scholar
  20. Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Burns, T. (1992). Erving Goffman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Buttny, R. (1993). Social accountability in communication. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  25. Cicourel, A. V. (1974). Cognitive sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cicourel, A. V. (1981). Notes on the integration of micro-and macro-levels of analysis. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro-and macro-sociologies. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  27. Clark, H. H. (1985). Language use and language users. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, volume 2 (pp. 179–231). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  28. Clayman, S. E. (1988). Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems, 55(4).Google Scholar
  29. Clayman, S. E., & Gill, V. T. (Forthcoming). Conversation analysis. In A. Bryman & M. Hardy (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Corsaro, W. A. (1979). Young children’s conception of status and role. Sociology of Education, 55, 160–177.Google Scholar
  32. Corsaro, W. A. (1996). Transitions in early childhood: The promise of comparative, longitudinal ethnography. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 419–456). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Coulter, J. (1989). Mind in action. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  34. Coulthard, M. (1977). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  35. Danet, B. (1980). Language in the legal process. Law and Society Review, 14, 445–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35, 398–417.Google Scholar
  37. Drew, P., & Wootton, A. (1988). Erving Gojfman: Exploring the interaction order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  38. Eder, D., & Enke, J. (1991). The structure of gossip: Opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents. American Sociological Review, 56, 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Edwards, J. (1979). Language and disadvantage. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  42. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  43. Ervin-Tripp. (1972). On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  44. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  45. Firth, J. R. (1935). The techniques of semantics. Transactions of the Philological society, 7, 36–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fisher, S. (1983). Doctor talk/patient talk: How treatment decisions are negotiated in doctor-patient communication. In S. Fisher & A. D. Todd (Eds.), The social organization of doctor-patient communication (pp. 135–157). Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  47. Fishman, J. (1983). Levels of analysis in sociolinguistic explanation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 39.Google Scholar
  48. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  49. Garfmkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  50. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. D. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar
  51. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Giles, H., & Robinson, W. P. (1990). Prologue. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 1–8). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Glenn, P. (1995). Lauging at and laughing with: Negotiations of participant alignments through conversational laughter. In P. T. Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 43–56). Washington DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  54. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  55. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  56. Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 1–29.Google Scholar
  57. Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Goodwin, C. (1988). Participation frameworks in children’s argument. In K. Ekberg & P. E. Mjaavatn (Eds.), Growing into a modern world: Proceedings from an international interdisciplinary conference on the life and development of children in modern society (pp. 1188–1195). Trondheim Norway: The Norwegian Centre for Child Research.Google Scholar
  59. Goodwin, C, & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 67, 53–59.Google Scholar
  62. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & N. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3, Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  63. Grimshaw, A. (1989). Collegial discourse: Professional conversation among peers. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar
  64. Grimshaw, A. D. (1974). Sociolinguistics. In I. D. S. Pool & W. Schramm (Eds.), Handbook of communication (pp. 49–92). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  65. Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Introduction. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 1–25). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  66. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Gumperz, J. J., & Hymes, D. (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  68. Haakana, M. (2001). Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text, 21, 187–219.Google Scholar
  69. Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  70. Harré, R. (1986). An outline of the social constructionist viewpoint. In R. Harré (Ed.), The social construction of emotions (pp. 2–14). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  71. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  72. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  73. Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. W. (Eds.). (2003). Practicing medicine: Structure and process in primary care encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Hertzler, J. O. (1965). A sociology of language. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  75. Hester, S., & Francis, D. (2000). Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, and “institutional talk.” Text, 20, 391–413.Google Scholar
  76. Hewitt, J. P. (1997). Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  77. Holtgraves, T. (1991). Interpreting questions and replies: Effects of face-threat, question form, and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. House, J. S. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40, 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the standardized survey interview: The living questiionnaire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Hovland, C. I., Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. (1953). Persuasion and communication. New Have: Yale University press.Google Scholar
  81. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  82. Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  83. Jefferson, G. (1986). Notes on “latency” in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9, 153–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Katriel, T., & Philipsen, G. (1990). “What we need is communication”: “Communication” as a cultural category in some American speech. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural contact (pp. 77–93). Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  85. Key, M. R. (1972). Linguistic behavior of male and female. Linguistics, 88, 15–31.Google Scholar
  86. Kitzinger, C. (2000). How to resist an idiom. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 121–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kollock, P., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1985). Sex and power in interaction: Conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, 50, 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Labov, W. (1972a). Language in the inner city: Studies in the black english vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  89. Labov, W. (1972b). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  90. Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  91. Lavin, D., & Maynard, D. W. (2001). Standardization vs. Rapport: Respondent laughter and interviewer reaction during telephone surveys. American Sociological Review, 66, 453–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Lennenberg, E. H. (1953). Cognition and ethnolinguistics. Language, 29, 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Lerner, G. (1989). Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 167–177.Google Scholar
  94. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive societies. In C. K. Ogden & J. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 451–510). London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  96. Mandler, J. M. (1984). Scripts, stories and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  97. Manning, P. (1992). Erving Goffman and modern sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Manzo, J. (1996). Taking turns and taking sides: Opening scenes from two jury deliverations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Marlaire, C. L., & Maynard, D. W. (1990). Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon. Sociology of Education, 63, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Maynard, D. W. (1991). Interaction and asymmetry in clinical discourse. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 448–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Maynard, D. W. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  102. Maynard, D. W., & Clayman, S. E. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Maynard, D. W., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Schaeffer, N. C, & Zouwen, H. v. d. (Eds.). (2002). Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
  104. McDermott, R. P., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24, 245–275.Google Scholar
  105. McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183–213.Google Scholar
  106. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  107. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Mehan, H. (1991). The school’s work of sorting students. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Ed.), Talk and social structure (pp. 71–90). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  109. Molotch, H. L., & Boden, D. (1985). Talking social structure: Discourse, domination and the watergate hearings. American Sociological Review, 50, 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Mori, J. (1999). Negotiating agreement and disagreement in Japanese: Connective expressions and turn construction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  111. Mulkay, M. (1979). Science and the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  112. Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.). (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  113. Okamoto, D. G., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). Changing the subject: Gender, status, and the dynamics of topic change. American Sociological Review, 66, 852–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Perakyla, A. (1995). Aids counseling: Institutional interaction and clinical practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  115. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  116. Phillips, S. (1982). The invisible culture: Communication in classroom and community on the warm springs Indian reservation. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  117. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  118. Pitkin, H. F. (1972). Wittgenstein and justice: On the significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for social and political thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  119. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social construction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  120. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  121. Rawls, A. W. (1987). The interaction order sui generis: Goffman’s contribution to social theory. Sociological Theory, 5, 136–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  123. Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 21–27). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  124. Sacks, H. (1992a). Lectures on conversation (Vol. I: Fall 1964–Spring 1968). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  125. Sacks, H. (1992b). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2: Fall 1968–Spring 1972). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  126. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Saussure, F. D. (1962). Cours de linguistiqu generate. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  128. Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  129. Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Schegloff, E. A. (1989). Reflections on language, development and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In M. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 139–153). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  131. Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 44–70). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  132. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided for place for the defence of inter-subjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 95(5), 1295–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  137. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  138. Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 59–82). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  139. Shaver, K. G. (1983). An introduction to attribution processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  140. Silverman, D. (1987). Communication and medical practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  141. Sorjonen, M.-L. (2001). Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  142. Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. Philosophical Review, 73, 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Strong, P. (1979). The ceremonial order of the clinic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  144. Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  145. Tanaka, H. (1999). Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: A study in grammar and interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  146. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William MorrowGoogle Scholar
  147. ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  148. Thorne, B., & Henley, N. (1975). Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  149. van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. V. Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  150. van Dijk, T. (Ed.). (1985). Handbook of discourse analysis, volumes 1–4. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  151. Waitzkin, H. (1991). The politics of medical encounters: How patients and doctors deal with social problems. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  152. Watson, R. (2000). The character of “institutional talk”: A response to Hester and Francis. Text, 20, 377–389.Google Scholar
  153. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  154. West, C, & Garcia, A. (1988). Conversational shift work. Social Problems, 35, 550–575.Google Scholar
  155. West, C, & Zimmerman, D. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations with unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 102–117). Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  156. West, C, & Zimmerman, D. H. (1985). Gender, language and discourse. In T. A. V. Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 4 (pp. 103–124). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  157. Whalen, M., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 172–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  159. Wieder, D. L. (1974). Language and social reality. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  160. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  161. Woolgar, S. (1988). Science the very idea. London: Ellis Horwood and Tavistock.Google Scholar
  162. Wootton, A. J. (1981). The management of grantings and rejections by parents in request sequences. Semiotica, 37, 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Zimmerman, D. H. (1970). The practicalities of rule use. In J. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life (pp. 221–238). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  164. Zimmerman, D. H., & Boden, D. (1991). Structure-inaction: An introduction. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas W. Maynard
    • 1
  • Anssi Peräkylä
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Social PsychologyUniversity of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations