Advertisement

The Symbolic Interactionist Frame

  • Sheldon Stryker
  • Kevin D. Vryan
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Keywords

Social Behavior Social Life Social Process American Sociological Review Role Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, Patricia A., & Adler, Peter. (1991). Backboards and blackboards: College athletes and role engulfment. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, Howard S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blumer, Herbert. (1937). Social psychology. In E. P. Schmidt (Ed.), Man and society (pp. 144–198). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Blumer, Herbert. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Blumer, Herbert. (1980). Mead and Blumer: The convergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review 45, 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryson, Gladys. (1945). Man and society: The Scottish inquiry of the eighteenth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Burawoy, Michael. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Burke, Peter J. (1991). Attitudes, behavior, and the self. In J. A. Howard & P. L. Callero (Eds.), The self society interface: Cognition, emotion and action (pp. 189–208). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Burke, Peter J., & Reitzes, Donald C. (1981). The link between identity and role performance. Social Psychology Quarterly 44, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Camic, Charles. (1986). The matter of habit. American Journal of Sociology 91, 1039–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charmaz, Kathy. (1995). Grounded theory. In R. Harre, J. A. Smith, & L. Van Langenhore (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Cooley, Charles Horton. (1894). The theory of transportation. Baltimore, MD: American Economics Association.Google Scholar
  13. Cooley, Charles Horton. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  14. Couch, Carl J. (1994). Why I went into the laboratory: And, what we found. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 16, 21–34.Google Scholar
  15. Couch, Carl J., Saxton, Stan L., & Katovich, Michael A. (1986). Studies in symbolic interaction: The Iowa school. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  16. Denzin, Norman K. (1990). The spaces of postmodernism: Reading Plummer on Blumer. Symbolic Interaction 13, 145–154.Google Scholar
  17. Denzin, Norman K. (1992). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Denzin, Norman K. (1996). The epistemological crisis in the human disciplines: Letting the old do the work of the new. In A. Colby, R. Jessor, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 127–151). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dewey, John. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewey, John. (1930). Human nature and conduct. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  21. Ellis, Carolyn, & Bochner, Arthur P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Fine, Gary Alan. (1992). Agency, structure, and comparative contexts: Toward a synthetic interactionism. Symbolic Interaction 15, 87–107.Google Scholar
  23. Fine, Gary Alan. (1998). Morel tales: The culture of mushrooming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Glaser, Barney G., & Strauss, Anselm L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  25. Goffman, Erving. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  26. Goffman, Erving. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gouldner, Alvin W. (1970). The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Harris, Scott R. (2001). What can interactionism contribute to the study of inequality? The case of marriage and beyond. Symbolic Interaction 24, 455–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heise, David R. (1979). Understanding events: Affect and the construction of social action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Heise, David R. (1986). Modeling symbolic interaction. In J. S. Coleman, S. Lindenberg, & S. Nowak (Eds.), Approaches to social theory (pp. 291–309). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  31. Huber, Joan. (1973). Symbolic interaction as a pragmatic perspective: The bias of emergent theory. American Sociological Review 38, 274–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Irwin, John. (1977). Scenes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. James, William. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  34. Jasso, Guillermina. (2001). Formal theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 37–68). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Joas, Hans. (1993). Pragmatism and social theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Katovich, Michael A., & Reese II, William A. (1987). The regular: Full-time identities and memberships in an urban bar. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 16, 308–343.Google Scholar
  37. Kuhn, Manford H. (1964). Major trends in symbolic interaction theory in the past twenty-five years. Sociological Quarterly V, 61–84.Google Scholar
  38. Kuhn, Manford H., & McPartland, Thomas S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review 19, 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lemert, Edwin. (1951). Social pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Maines, David R. (2000). Pragmatism. In E. F. Borgatta & R. J. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology (pp. 2217–2224). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Maines, David R. (2001). The faultline of consciousness: A view of interactionism in sociology. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  42. McCall, George J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  43. McPhail, C, & Rexroat, C. (1979). Mead vs. Blumer: The divergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review 44, 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mead, George Herbert. (1930). Cooley’s contribution to American social thought. American Journal of Sociology 35, 693–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mead, George Herbert. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Miller, George A. (Ed.). (1973). Communication, language, and meaning: Psychological perspectives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  47. Mullins, Nicholas C. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  48. Musolf, Gil Richard. (1993). Some recent directions in symbolic interactionism. In L. T. Reynolds (Ed.), Interactionism: Exposition and Critique (3d ed., pp. 231–283). Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.Google Scholar
  49. Park, Robert Ezra. (1955). Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  50. Park, Robert Ezra, & Burgess, Ernest W. (1922). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Plummer, Ken. (1990). Staying in the empirical world: Symbolic interactionism and postmodernism: A response to Denzin. Symbolic Interaction 13, 155–160.Google Scholar
  52. Reynolds, Larry T. (1993). Interactionism: Exposition and critique (3rd ed.). Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.Google Scholar
  53. Richardson, Laurel. (1991). Speakers whose voices matter: Toward a feminist postmodernist sociological prax. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (pp. 29–38). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  54. Richardson, Laurel. (1997). Fields of play. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rosenberg, Morris, & Turner, Ralph H. (Eds.) (1981). Social psychology: Sociological perspectives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  56. Schubert, Hans-Joachim. (1998). Introduction. In Charles Horton Cooley, On self and social organization (pp. 1–31). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. Seeman, Melvin. (1997). The elusive situation in social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly 60, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Serpe, Richard, & Stryker, Sheldon. (1987). The construction of self and the reconstruction of social relationships. Advances in Group Processes 4, 41–66.Google Scholar
  59. Shalin, Dmitri N. (1986). Pragmatism and social interactionism. American Sociological Review 51, 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Snow, David A. (2001). Extending and broadening Blumer’s conceptualization of symbolic interactionism. Symbolic Interaction 24, 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Strauss, Anselm L. (1978). Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  62. Strauss, Anselm L. (1994). From whence to whither: Chicago-style interactionism. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 16, 3–8.Google Scholar
  63. Stryker, Sheldon. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family 30, 558–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stryker, Sheldon. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
  65. Stryker, Sheldon. (1981). Symbolic interactionism: Themes and variations. In M. Rosenberg and R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 3–19). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  66. Stryker, Sheldon. (1988). Substance and style: An appraisal of the sociological legacy of Herbert Blumer. Symbolic Interaction 11, 33–42.Google Scholar
  67. Stryker, Sheldon. (1994). Identity theory: Its development, research base, and prospects. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 16, 9–20.Google Scholar
  68. Stryker, Sheldon. (1997). “In the beginning there is society”: Lessons from a sociological social psychology. In C. McGarty & A. Haslam (Eds.), Message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 315–327). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  69. Stryker, Sheldon. (2000). Symbolic interaction theory. In E. F. Borgatta & R. J. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 3095–3102). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
  70. Stryker, Sheldon. (2001a). Social psychology. In P. B. Baltes & N. J. Smelser (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 14, 409–14, 413) Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  71. Stryker, Sheldon. (2001b). Traditional symbolic interactionism, role theory, and structural symbolic interactionism: The road to identity theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 211–232). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stryker, Sheldon, & Burke, Peter J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63, 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thomas, William I. (1927). The behavior pattern and the situation. Publications of the American Sociological Society 22, 1–14.Google Scholar
  74. Thomas, William I., & Thomas, Dorothy S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  75. Thomas, William I., & Znaniecki, Florian. (1918–1920). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  76. Tucker, Charles W. (1966). Some methodological problems of Kuhn’s self theory. Sociological Quarterly 7, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turner, Ralph H. (1962). Role-taking: Process versus conformity. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 20–40). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
  78. Volkart, Edmund H. (Ed.). (1951). Social behavior and personality: Contributions of W. I. Thomas to theory and social research. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
  79. Vryan, Kevin D., Adler, Patricia A., & Adler, Peter. (forthcoming). Identity. In L. J. Reynolds & N. J. Herman (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheldon Stryker
    • 1
  • Kevin D. Vryan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyIndiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations