Skip to main content

Alley Art: Can We... See... at Last, the End of Ontology?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adorno, T. W. (1984). Aesthetic theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (1995). Fin de sidcle social theory. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antal, F (1966). Classicism and romanticism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apollinaire, G. (1913/1949). The Cubist painters. New York: Schultz Wittenborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, H. (1916/1925). Expressionism. London: F. Henderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. M. (1992). The fate of art. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, J. R. (1980). A framework of meaning in architecture. In G. Broadbent, R. Bunt, & C. Jencks (Eds.), Signs, symbols, and architecture (pp. 333–368). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau. J. R. (1995). Art museums. In G. R. Carroll & M. T. Hannan (Eds.), Organizations in industry (pp. 87–114). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, J. R. (1996). The toggle switch of institutions: Religion and art in the US in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Social Forces, 74, 1159–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, J. R. (2000). Bringing in codependency. In J. Blau (Ed.), Companion to sociology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. B., Rivera, D., & Trotsky, L. (1938). Towards a free revolutionary art. Partisan Review, 4(1), 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürger, P., & Bürger, C. (Eds.). (1992). The institutions of art. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., & Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.). (1999). Moral spaces: Rethinking ethics and world politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corse, S. M. (1997). Nationalism and literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1987). The transformation of the avant-garde. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimp, D. (1983). On the museum’s ruins. In H. Foster (Ed.), The anti-aesthetic (pp. 43–56). Port Townsend, WA: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, B. (1913/1965). Guide to aesthetics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. C. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. C. (1985). The philosophical disenfranchisement of art. In P J. McCormick (Ed.), The reasons of art/L’art a ses raisons (pp. 11–22). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. C. (1997). After the end of art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934/1958). Art as experience. New York: Capricorn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, G. (1988). Evaluating art. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P J. (1982). Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-century Boston. Media, Culture and Society, 4, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziemidok, B. (1985). On aesthetic and artistic evaluations of the work of art. In The reasons of art/L’art a ses raisons (pp. 295–396). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1973/1982). This is not a pipe. With illustrations and letters by Rene Magritte. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, R. (1909/1924). An essay in aesthetics. In Vision and design. New York: Brentano’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Sheed and Ward Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. J. (1999). Popular culture and high culture. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E. H. (1971). Norm and form, 2nd ed. London: Phaidon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A. (1992). The death of an audience. The New Yorker, 68, 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, C. (1939). Avant-garde and kitsch. Partisan Review, 6, 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilbaut, S. (1983). How New York stole the idea of modern art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, D. (1993). Inside culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. D. (1999). Transatlantic dialogue: Contemporary art in and out of Africa. Ackland Art Museum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, C., & Wood, P. (1992). Art in theory: 1900–1990. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1757/1998). On the standard of taste. In C. Korsmeyer (Ed.), Aesthetics: The big questions (pp. 137–149). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, E (1981). The political unconscious. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (1973). Modern movements in architecture. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1790/1952). The critique of judgement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. (1986). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, E. (1980). The age of structuralism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K. (1957). Problems of art. New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. S. (1993). Behind the postmodern faCade. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1998). Entre nous: On thinking of the other. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-E (1992). The postmodern explained. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. A. (2000). Informality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondrian, P (1920/1992). Neo-plasticism: The general principle of plastic equivalence. In C. M. Harrison & P Wood (Eds.), Art in theory 1900–1920 (pp. 287–290). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji, C. (1997). Territorial ambitions and the gardens of Versailles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, C. (1983). The discourse of others. In H. Foster (Ed.), The anti-aesthetic (pp. 57–82). Port Townsend, WA: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, A. (1962/1992). Art as art. In C. Harrison & P Wood (Eds.), Art in theory, 1900–1990 (pp. 806–809). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, H. (1967). Collective, ideological, combative. In T. B. Hess & J. Ashbery (Eds.), Avant-garde art (pp. 81–92). London: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santayana, G. (1896/1955). The sense of beauty. New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1948). Existentialism and humanism. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, E S. (1999). Who paid the piper? London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senie, H. E, & Webster, S. (Eds.). (1992). Critical issues inpublic art. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, W. M., Jr. (1996). Fringe and fortune. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, R. (1979). Cultural confinement, In N. Holt (Ed.), The writings of Robert Smithson (pp. 132–133). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, G. (1985). Aesthetics and the end of epistemology. In P J. McCormick (Eds.), The reasons of art/L’art a ses raisons (pp. 287–295). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1994). The vision machine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1961). The long revolution. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. E. (1999). Placing aesthetics. Athens: Ohio University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blau, J.R. (2001). Alley Art: Can We... See... at Last, the End of Ontology?. In: Turner, J.H. (eds) Handbook of Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-32458-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36274-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics