Abstract
For armed forces, the pace of change since the end of the Cold War in 1989 has been extraordinary. Even though a major world war no longer seems to pose a serious threat to international peace and stability, militaries find themselves operating in more diverse envi-ronments than ever before. In the past, military astuteness and a clear picture of the enemy were sufficient. Today members of the military must-in diffuse political constellations- negotiate with belligerents from all sides of a conflict and remain neutral, at the same time remaining able to defend themselves against aggression. They also have to deal with a host of international actors in the theater of operations, including representatives of multilateral organizations, the media, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). And they must do this in a foreign cultural environment, in a country devastated by war, far removed from family and friends. Such conditions demand a high level of intercultural competence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Speech by General (ret.) Colin Powell and subsequent discussion at the “Equal Opportunities Conference,” Great Britain, Royal Society of Arts, November 10, 1998.
It is interesting to note that over a decade ago the Canadian forces were unable to successfully prove that gender integration was detrimental to operational efficiency and thus in 1989 the Human Rights Tribunal found that the military’s exemption from the Canadian Human Rights Act based on the occupational requirement could not be supported by the evidence (Winslow, 1999). Therefore, the Tribunal ruled that Canadian forces’ policy, which designated specific units and occupations as male only, was an unjustified discriminatory practice.
For a description of “DEOMI thinking” see Dansby, Steart, and Webb (2001).
Specific information on intercultural training in the U.S. military can be found in Dansby and Landis, 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winslow, D.J., Heinecken, L., Soeters, J.L. (2006). Diversity in the Armed Forces. In: Caforio, G. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of the Military. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34576-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34576-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-32456-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34576-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)