Skip to main content

Diversity in the Armed Forces

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of the Military

Abstract

For armed forces, the pace of change since the end of the Cold War in 1989 has been extraordinary. Even though a major world war no longer seems to pose a serious threat to international peace and stability, militaries find themselves operating in more diverse envi-ronments than ever before. In the past, military astuteness and a clear picture of the enemy were sufficient. Today members of the military must-in diffuse political constellations- negotiate with belligerents from all sides of a conflict and remain neutral, at the same time remaining able to defend themselves against aggression. They also have to deal with a host of international actors in the theater of operations, including representatives of multilateral organizations, the media, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). And they must do this in a foreign cultural environment, in a country devastated by war, far removed from family and friends. Such conditions demand a high level of intercultural competence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Speech by General (ret.) Colin Powell and subsequent discussion at the “Equal Opportunities Conference,” Great Britain, Royal Society of Arts, November 10, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. It is interesting to note that over a decade ago the Canadian forces were unable to successfully prove that gender integration was detrimental to operational efficiency and thus in 1989 the Human Rights Tribunal found that the military’s exemption from the Canadian Human Rights Act based on the occupational requirement could not be supported by the evidence (Winslow, 1999). Therefore, the Tribunal ruled that Canadian forces’ policy, which designated specific units and occupations as male only, was an unjustified discriminatory practice.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For a description of “DEOMI thinking” see Dansby, Steart, and Webb (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Specific information on intercultural training in the U.S. military can be found in Dansby and Landis, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winslow, D.J., Heinecken, L., Soeters, J.L. (2006). Diversity in the Armed Forces. In: Caforio, G. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of the Military. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34576-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics