Abstract

The recently developed knowledge-based view of the firm argues that knowledge is the firm’s most valuable resource. Within this field of study, informal social networks are rapidly gaining attention as mechanisms that facilitate knowledge flows. Electronic networks of practice are a special case of informal networks where the sharing of practice-related knowledge occurs primarily through computer-based communication technologies. However, we know relatively little about the dynamics of knowledge exchange that occur in these electronic networks. This paper posits that there is a relationship between the structural properties of electronic networks of practice and successful knowledge exchange. The theoretical positions of social network theory and the knowledge-based view of the firm are used to support this claim.

Keywords

Knowledge networks of practice electronic community social networks 

References

  1. Bavelas, A. “A Mathematical Model for Group Structure,” Human Organizations (7), 1948, pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
  2. Borgatti, S. P., and Everett, M. G. “Models of Core/Periphery Structures,” Social Networks (21), 1999, pp. 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouty, I. “Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries,” Academy of Management Journal (43:1), 2000, pp. 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. The Social Life of Information, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Buckingham Shum, S. “Negotiating the Construction and Reconstruction of Organizational Memories,” Journal of Universal Computer Science (3:8), 1997, pp. 899–928.Google Scholar
  6. Burt, R. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., and Parker, A. “Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration,” California Management Review (44:2), Winter 2002, pp. 25–46.Google Scholar
  8. Cummings, J., and Cross, R. “Structural Properties of Work Groups and Their Consequences for Performance,” Social Networks (25), 2003, pp. 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davenport, T. H. Information Ecology, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Degenne, A., and Forse, M. Introducing Social Networks, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Drucker, P. Post-Capitalist Society, New York: Harper Business, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. Glazer, R. “Measuring the Knower: Toward a Theory of Knowledge Equity,” California Management Review (40:3), 1998, pp. 175–194.Google Scholar
  13. Goldkuhl, G., and Barf, E. “Organizational Ability: Constituents and Congruencies,” in Knowledge Management in the Sociotechnical World.: The Graffiti Continues, E. Coakes, D. Willis, and S. Clarke (eds.), London: Springer, 2002, pp. 30–42.Google Scholar
  14. Grandori, A., and Soda, G. “Inter-Firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms,” Organization Studies (16:2), 1995, pp. 183–214.Google Scholar
  15. Grant, R. M. “Knowledge and Organization,” in Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization, I. Nonaka and D. J. Teece (eds.), London: Sage Publications, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Grant, R. M. “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), 1996, pp. 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen, M. T. Knowledge Integration in Organizations, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. Hildreth, P., and Kimble, C. “The Duality of Knowledge,” Information Research (8:1), Paper Number 142, 2002 (available online at http://InformationR.net/ir/8-1/paper142.html).Google Scholar
  19. Huang, K. “Capitalizing Collective Knowledge for Winning Execution and Teamwork,” Journal of Knowledge Management (1:2), 1997, pp. 149–209.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., and Borgatti, S. P. “A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms,” Academy of Management Review (22:4), 1997, pp. 911–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leonard, D., and Sensiper, S. “The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation,” California Management Review (40:3), 1998, pp. 112–131.Google Scholar
  22. Nonaka, I. “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organization Science (5:1), 1994, pp. 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nooteboom, B. Inter-Firm Collabortion, Learning and Networks, London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
  24. Schenkel, A., Teigland, R., and Borgatti, S. P. “Theorizing Structural Properties of Communities of Practice: A Social Network Approach,” paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Organization and Management Division, Washington DC, 2001.Google Scholar
  25. Shaw, M. E. (ed.). Communication Networks, New York: Academic Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  26. Spender, J. C. “Knowledge Fields: Some Post-9/11 Thoughts About the Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” in Handbook on Knowledge Management, C. W. Holsapple (ed.), New York: Springer, 2003, pp. 59–72.Google Scholar
  27. Teece, D. J. “Research Directions for Knowledge Management,” California Management Review (40:3), 1998, pp. 289–292.Google Scholar
  28. Teigland, R., and Wasko, M. “Integrating Knowledge Through Information Trading: Examining the Relationship Between Boundary Spanning Communication and Individual Performance,” Decision Sciences (34:2), Spring 2003, pp. 261–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Teigland, R., and Wasko, M. “Extending Richness with Reach: Participation and Knowledge Exchange in Electronic Networks of Practice,” in Knowledge Networks: Innovation Through Communities of Practice, P. Hildreth and C. Kimble (eds.), London: Idea Group, 2004.Google Scholar
  30. Van Maanen, J., and Barley, S. R. “Occupational Communities: Culture and Control in Organizations,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  31. Wasko, M. M., and Faraj, S. “Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice,” MIS Quarterly (29:1), March 2005, pp. 35–57.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eoin Whelan
    • 1
  1. 1.National University of IrelandGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations