Abstract

There is substantial literature on the use of information technology for competitive advantage and organizational transformation. In the main, this literature speaks to the world of IT-capable organizations, pursuing ever more challenging goals. This paper reports on a case study of an organization that had similar aims for its use of IT, but lacked the capability. Senior management chose a strategy of improvisation with the goal of learning-by-doing so that the capability would be developed. The paper assesses the achievements to date, suggests forward paths, and offers guidelines to organizations that find themselves in a similar state.

Keywords

Competitive advantage business strategy IT capability 

References

  1. Andreu, R., and Ciborra, C. “Organizational Learning and Core Capabilities Development: the Role of IT,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (5), 1996, pp. 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Applegate, L. M. “Managing in an Information Age: Transforming Organizations for the 1990s,” in R. Baskerville, S. Smithson, O. Ngwenyama, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Transforming Organizations with Information Technology, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1994, pp. 15–94.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, F. “Coda: Creativity and Improvisation in Jazz and Organizations: Implications for Organizational Learning, Organization Science (9:5), 1998, pp. 605–622.Google Scholar
  4. Bharadwaj, A. “A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation,” MIS Quarterly (24:1), 2000, pp. 169–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjørn-Andersen, N., and Turner, J. A. “Creating the Twenty-First Century Organization: The Metamorphosis of Oticon,” in R. Baskerville, S. Smithson, O. Ngwenyama, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Transforming Organizations with Information Technology, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1994, pp. 379–394.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, I. S., and Duguid, P. “Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice,” Organizational Science (2:1), 1991, pp. 40–57.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, N. “IT Doesn’t Matter,” Harvard Business Review, May 2003, pp. 41–49.Google Scholar
  8. Ciborra, C. “Notes on Improvisation and Time in Organizations,” Accounting Management and Information Technologies (9), 1999, pp. 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clemons, E. K., and Row, M. C. “Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences,” MIS Quarterly (15:4), 1991, pp. 487–505.Google Scholar
  10. Cunha, M. P., Cunha, J. V., Kamoche, K. “Organizational Improvisation: What, When, How and Why,” International Journal of Management Review (1:3), 1999, pp. 299–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dvorak, R. E., Holen, E., Mark, D., and Meehan, W. F. “Six Principles of High-Performance IT,” McKinsey Quarterly (3), 1997, pp. 164–177.Google Scholar
  12. Feeny, D. F., and Ives, B. “In Search of Sustainability,” Journal of Management Information Systems (7:1), 1990, pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
  13. Feeny, D. F., and Willcocks, L. P. “Re-Designing the IS Function Around Core Capabilities,” Long Range Planning (31), 1998, pp. 354–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammer, M., and Champy, J. Reengineering the Corporation, New York: HarperCollins, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. Kamoche, K., Cunha, M. P., and Cunha, J. V. “Towards a Theory of Organizational Improvisation: Looking Beyond the Jazz Metaphor,” Journal of Management Studies (40:8), 2003, pp. 2021–2051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., and Barney, J. “Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Analysis,” MIS Quarterly (19:4), 1995, pp. 487–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McFarlan, F. W. “Information Technology Changes the Way You Compete,” Harvard Business Review, May–June 1984, pp. 93–103.Google Scholar
  18. Miner, A. S., Bassoff, P., and Moorman, C. “Organizational Improvisation and Learning: A Field Study,” Administrative Science Quarterly (46), 2001, pp. 304–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mintzberg, H. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning: Reconceiving Roles for Planning, Plans, and Planners, New York: Free Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. Moorman, C, and Miner, A. S. “The convergence of planning and execution: improvisation in New Product Development, Journal of Marketing (62:3), 1998a, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moorman, C, Miner, A.S. (1998b), Organizational improvisation and organization memory, Academy of Management Review (23:4), 1998b, pp. 698–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orlikowski, W. J. “Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective,” Information Systems Research (7:1), 1996, pp. 63–92.Google Scholar
  23. Orlikowski, W. J., and Hoffman, J. D. “An Improvisational Model for Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies,” Sloan Management Review, Winter 1997, pp. 11–21.Google Scholar
  24. Peppard, J., and Ward, J. “Beyond Strategic Information Systems: Towards an IS Capability,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (13), 2004, pp. 167–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Porter, M., and Millar, V. E. “How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage” Harvard Business Review, July–August 1985, pp. 149–160.Google Scholar
  26. Ross, J., Beath, C. M., and Goodhue, D. L. “Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets,” Sloan Management Review (38:1), 1996, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
  27. Silva, L. O. “Outsourcing as Improvisation: A Case Sstudy in Latin America,” The Information Society (18), 2002, pp. 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Turban, E., Leidner, D., McLean, E., and Wetherbe, J. Information Technology for Management: Transforming Organizations in the Digital Economy, New York: Wiley, 2004.Google Scholar
  29. Ward, J., and Peppard, J. Strategic Planning for Information Systems (3rd ed.), Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2002.MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Weick, K. E. “Enacted Sensemaking in Crisis Situations,” Journal of Management Studies (25:4), 1988, pp. 305–317.Google Scholar
  31. Weick, K. E. “Introductory Essay: Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis,” Organization Science (9:5), 1998, pp. 543–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weick, K.E. “Organizational Redesign as Improvisation,” in G. P. Huber and W. H. Glick (eds.), Organizational Change and Redesign: Ideas and Insights for Improving Performance, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 345–379Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thi Lien Pham
    • 1
  • Ernest Jordan
    • 1
  1. 1.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations