Skip to main content

Organizational Design, Learning, and the Market Value of the Firm

  • Chapter
  • 2995 Accesses

Part of the Information and Organization Design Series book series (INOD,volume 6)

Abstract

We compare market returns associated with firms’ creation of new units focused on e-business. Two aspects of organization design - governance and leadership - are considered with regard to exploitation- and exploration-oriented organization learning. We find that exploitation in governance (high centralization) is associated with a lower mean and variance in returns; that exploitation in leadership (appointment of outsiders) is associated with the same mean yet higher variance; and, among units exhibiting both modes of learning, the variance of returns are not equal.

Keywords

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barney, J., 1991, Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M.J., and Tushman, M.L., 2003, Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited, Academy of Management Review, 28: 238–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., and Warner, J., 1985, Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies, Journal of Financial Economics, 14: 3–32.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., and Stalker, G.M., 1961, The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R.M., and Obel, B., 1998, Strategic Organization Diagnosis and Design: Developing Theory for Application, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., 1984, Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice, Harper & Row, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, CM., 1998, The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., Fisher, L., Jenson, M.C., and Roll, R., 1969, The adjustment of stock prices to new information, International Economics Review, 10(1): 1–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H., 2003, Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., and Raviv, A., 2002, Organization design, Management Science, 48(7): 852–865.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H.A., 1995, The demographic metabolism of organizations: Industry dynamics, turnover, and tenure distributions, Administrative Science Quarterly. 40(4):586–618.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B., Nystrom, P., and Starbuck, W., 1976, Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for self-designing organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly. 21(1):41–65.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist, M., 2004, Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development, Organization Design, 15(1): 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S.D., 2003, Information technology, organizational learning, and the market value of the firm, Journal of Information Technology: Theory & Application, 5(1): 1–28.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jemison, D.B., 1987, Risk and the relationship among strategy, organizational processes, and performance, Management Science, 33(9): 1087–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., 2002, New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime?, Academy of Management Journal, 45(5): 995–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D.J., et al., 1997, Organizational configurations and performance: A meta-analysis, Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 222–240.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, R., McDermott, C., O’Connor, G., Peters, L., Rice, M., and Veryzer, R., 2000, Radical innovation: How mature companies can outsmart upstarts, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D., and March, J.G., 1993, The myopia of learning, Strategic Management Journal, 14:95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., 1991, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., 1995, The future, disposable organizations, and the rigidities of imagination, Organization, 2(3/4): 427–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D., 1997, Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues, Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 626–657.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., 1999, Notes on the study of configuration, Management International Review, 39 Special Issue 2: 27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, A.S., Bassoff, P., and Moorman, C., 2001, Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2): 304–337.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nagar, V., 2002, Delegation and incentive compensation, Accounting Review, 77(2): 379–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, J.W., and Siggelkow, N., 2003, Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organization design, Management Science, 49(3): 290–311.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N., and Levinthal, D.A., 2003, Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adoption, Organization Science, 14(6): 650–669.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, J., 2002, The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1): 70–91.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., and Sorensen, J.B., 2001, Finding the right mix: Franchising, organizational learning, and chain performance, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7): 713–724.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T.E., and Podolny, J.M., 1996, Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Summer Issue): 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, K.M., Sitkin, S.B., and Browning, L., 2000, Tailoring process management to situational requirements, in: The Quality Movement and Organization Theory, R. Cole, and W.R. Scott, Sage, London, pp. 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M.L., and Anderson, P., 1986, Technological discontinuities and organizational environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3): 439–465.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vera, D., and Crossan, M., 2004, Strategic leadership and organizational learning, Academy of Management Review, 29(2): 222–240.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Weesie, 1, 1998, Regression analysis with multiplicative heteroscedasticity, Stata Technical Bulletin, 42: 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carroll, T.N., Hunter, S.D. (2006). Organizational Design, Learning, and the Market Value of the Firm. In: Burton, R.M., Håkonsson, D.D., Eriksen, B., Snow, C.C. (eds) Organization Design. Information and Organization Design Series, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34173-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics