Skip to main content

Structural Limitations in Organizational Design

The integration-differentiation paradigm

  • Chapter
Organization Design

Part of the book series: Information and Organization Design Series ((INOD,volume 6))

Abstract

This contribution presents the idea that we need to look at the professional bureaucracy and design mechanical structures with lateral knowledge liaisons when exceptions are generated on a continuous basis. By decreasing the information processing need and replacing autonomy with formalization and centralization, individual knowledge workers assigned to organizational tasks can concentrate on specific tasks and will be released from the information-processing demand for more organic structural designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaker, D.A., and Mascarenhas, B., 1984, The need for strategic flexibility, Journal of Business Strategy, 5(2): 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allred, B.B., Snow C.C., and Miles R.E., 1996, Characteristics of Managerial Careers in the 21’ century, Academy of Management, 10(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K., 1974, The Limits of Organization, W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. R., 1956, Introduction to Cybernetics, Methuen, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., 1970, A formal theory of differentiation in organizations, American Sociological Review, 35: 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S., 1957, On perceptual readiness, Psychological Review, 64: 132–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchko, A. A., 1994, Conceptualization and Measurement of Environmental Uncertainty: An Assessment of the Miles and Snow Perceived Environmental Uncertainty Scale. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns T., and Stalker, G. M., 1961, The Management of Innovation, Tavistok, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R.M., and Obel, B., 2004, Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D., 1962, Strategy and Structure, MIT Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., and Levinthal, D.A., 1990, Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R.A., 1994, Hypercompetitive Rivalries: Competing in Highly Dynamic Environments, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, W.R., 1958, Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy, Administrative Science Quarterly, 2: 409–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R., 1973, Designing Complex Organizations, Addision-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R., 1974, Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3): 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.R., 1977, Organization Design, Reading, Addision-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M., 1996, Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4): 375–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M., 1996, Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halal, W.E., 1994, From Hierarchy to Enterprise: Internal markets are the new foundation of management. Academy of Management Executive, 8(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G., 1994, A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-Form Corporation, Strategic Management Journal, 15: 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G.P., 2004, The Necessary Nature of Future Firms: Attributes of Survivors in a Changing World. Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G.P. and McDaniel R.R., 1986, The decision-making paradigm of organizational design. Management Science, 32(5): 572–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lant, T.K., and Mezias, S.J., 1992, An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organization Science, 3(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.R., 1981, Organization and Environment Perspective, in: Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, Van de Ven, A. H., and Joyce, W. F., Havard Business Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.R., and Lorsch, J.W., 1967, Organization and Environment, Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., and March J.G., 1988, Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14:319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., 1991, Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, R.L., 1963, Communications Overload: Proposals from the Study of a University Library. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7(4): 521–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., 1981, Organization Design: Fashion of Fit? Harvard Business Review, 59(1):103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C., 1967, A Framework for Comparative Analysis of Organizations. American Sociological Review, 32: 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pondy, L.R., and Mitroff I., 1979, Beyond open system models of organization, in: Research in Organizational Behavior 1, JAI Press, Greewich, pp. 3–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.B., 1992, The intelligent enterprise, a new paradigm. Academy of Management Executive,6(4): 48–63.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R.W., 2003, Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, 5th ed., Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A., 1973, Applying information technology to organization design. Public Administrative Review, 33(2): 268–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.C., Miles R.E., and Coleman, H.J. Jr., 1992, Managing 21 Century Network Organizations, Organizational Dynamics, Winter, pp. 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D., 1967, Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, R.E., 1979, Dimensions of organizational environments: An exploratory study of their impact on organization structure. Academy of Management Journal, 22(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H.W., 1996, Toward the flexible Form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments, Organization Science, 7(4): 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J., 1965, Industrial Organization, Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K E., 1982, Management of organizational change among loosely coupled elements, in: In Change in Organizations: New Perspectives in Theory, Research, and Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 375–408.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gulløv, T. (2006). Structural Limitations in Organizational Design. In: Burton, R.M., Håkonsson, D.D., Eriksen, B., Snow, C.C. (eds) Organization Design. Information and Organization Design Series, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34173-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics