Skip to main content

Action Leadership, Multi-Contingency Theory and Fit

  • Chapter

Part of the Information and Organization Design Series book series (INOD,volume 6)

Abstract

What is a good measure for an action-oriented leadership style to employ in the Multi-contingency Model? We develop leadership dimensions of delegation and uncertainty avoidance using factor analysis and test its implications, here on strategic implementation. An explore-exploit view of strategy is similarly confirmed using factor analysis. Using these complementary measures, we test four misfit hypotheses. Of the four, the data from medium-sized Danish enterprises support two hypotheses: a strategy of low exploration is a misfit with a leadership style of high delegation; a strategy of low exploitation is a misfit with a leadership style of high uncertainty avoidance. For researchers, an action-oriented leadership approach is integral to the multi-contingency theory and greatly enriches our theory of organizational design. For CEOs, leadership is made operational and action-oriented to solve problems and resolve misfit conditions for good performance.

Key words

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Burton, R., Obel, B. and Lauridsen, J., 2002. Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits, Management Science, 48(11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R.M., DeSanctis, G., and Obel B., 2006, Organizational Design, A Step-by-Step Approach, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R., and Obel, B,. 2004. Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: Developing Theory for Application. The Dynamics of Fit, 3rd ed., Kluwer Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M., and March, J. G., 1963, A behavioral theory of the Firm, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L., 2001. The Contingency Theory of Organizations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, D. H., Glick, W. H., and Huber, G. P., 1993, Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories, Academy of Management Journal, 38(6): 1198–1250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, B. and Døjbak, D., 1998a, Data collection procedures, response rates, and analysis of non-respondents. Publications from Department of Management, No. 3. University of Southern Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, B., and Døjbak, D., 1998b, Descriptive analysis, Publication from Department of Management, No. 4, University of Southern Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., 1988, A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: Integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy, Academy of Management Journal, 31(4): 828–53.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., 2003, On the staying power of defenders, analyzers, and prospectors, Academy of Management Executive, 17(4): 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hax, A., Hax, C., and Majluf, N.S., 1984, Strategic Management: An Integrative Perspective, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandwalla, P.N., 1976, Some top management styles, their context, and performance, Academy of Management Review, 11: 266–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J.P., 1988, The Leadership Factor, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiades, M., 1983, A diagnostic framework for Planning. Strategic Management Journal, 4: 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R., 1967, The Human Organization New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., 1991, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2: 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C., 1978, Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., 1978, Patterns in Strategy Formation, Management Science, 24: 934–48.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, N., Rees, A., and Brooks-Rooney, A., 1990, Strategy, innovation, and performance, Journal of Management Studies, 27(5): 511–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., 1980, Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidler, J., 1974, On Using Informants: A technique for collecting quantitative data and controlling measurement error in organizational analysis, American Sociological Review, 39:816–831.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., 1996, Applied Multivariate Techniques, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, N., and Camillus, J.C., 1984, Exploring the concept of “fit” in strategic management, Academy of Management Review, 9(3): 513–525.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zalesnik, A., 1979, Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business Review, 15: 67–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Håkonsson, D.D., Burton, R.M., Obel, B., Lauridsen, J. (2006). Action Leadership, Multi-Contingency Theory and Fit. In: Burton, R.M., Håkonsson, D.D., Eriksen, B., Snow, C.C. (eds) Organization Design. Information and Organization Design Series, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34173-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics