Skip to main content

Using Fuzzy Value Tree Analysis to Support The Verification, Validation, and Accreditation of Models and Simulations

  • Conference paper
Modeling and Simulation Tools for Emerging Telecommunication Networks
  • 761 Accesses

Abstract

The process of accrediting a model can roughly be divided into first gathering and evaluating results of conducted verification and validation (V& V) activities, and then aggregating these (raw) results into a total value: the accreditation decision. Especially the second part is not trivial, because results of V& V activities are quite manifold and at first sight not comparable with each other. Consider for example the evaluation of subject matter expert statements in contrast to real numbers as an outcome of statistical tests.

Classical decision analysis is one possibility to support the accreditation decision by using a structured, scientifically justified approach. For that purpose, mainly the concept of value tree analysis is used. In previous papers, the current state-of-the-art concerning decision analytic methodologies supporting VV&A was reviewed. Also a critical examination, describing gaps and deficiencies was conducted. A concept was drafted, how fuzzy value tree analysis, a branch of decision analysis incorporating fuzzy set theory, can be used to overcome some of these deficiencies, as there are: First, modeling subject matter experts statements, second, quantifying not only the value, but also the knowledge resp. ignorance about the model under study, and finally, being able to distinguish between compensational and non-compensational attributes in the value tree.

Fuzzy value tree analysis consists of the steps

  • establishing the value tree,

  • assigning values to attributes,

  • aggregating the attribute values, and

  • interpreting the result.

A raw draft of the concept, as well as a definition of attribute values in a fuzzy value tree analysis was dealt with in previous publications. The paper at hand takes these publications as a starting point and presents a concept how attribute values in a fuzzy value tree analysis can be aggregated, i. e. the aggregator is defined.

Starting from establishing requirements and constraints, these postulations are transformed into mathematical properties the aggregator must adhere to. After scanning the literature for possible fuzzy set theoretic operators, it is proven that the defined aggregator fulfills the mathematical properties established and therefore all requirements and constraints. The paper closes with illustrative examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Osman Balci, Michael L. Talbert, and Richard E. Nance. Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Complex System Design Evalutation. Technical Report 24061-0106, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Osman Balci, Robin J. Adams, David S. Myers, and Richard E. Nance. A Collaborative Evaluation Environment for Credibility Assessment of Modeling and Simulation Applications. In E. Yücesan, C.-H. Chen, J. L. Snowdon, and J. M. Charnes, editors, Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, pages 214–220, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert O. Lewis. A Comprehensive VV&A Cost Estimating Tool. MORS SIMVAL, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Siegfried Pohl and Dirk Brade. Using Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Theory in the Accreditation of Models, Simulations, and Federation. Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 05S-SIW-042, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Siegfried Pohl and Dirk Brade. Representing Results of V&V-Activities in Fuzzy Decision Analysis Value Trees. European Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 05E-SIW-012, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paul Goodwin and George Wright. Decision Analysis for Management Judgement. John Wiley & Sons, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Helsinki University of Technology Systems Analysis Laboratory. Introduction to value tree analysis — http://www.mcda.hut.fi/valuetree/.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Osman Balci. Verification, Validation, and Certification of Modeling and Simulation Applications. In S. Chick, P. J. Sanchez, D. Ferrin, and D. J. Morrice, editors, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, pages 150–158, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Osman Balci. A Methodology for Certification of Modeling and Simulation Applications. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 11(4):352–377, Oktober 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann and Lothar Gutsche. Multi-Criteria Anlyse. Springer Verlag, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ralph L. Keeney and Howard Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley & Sons, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Didier Dubois and Henry Prade, editors. Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Dubois and H. Prade. Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Application. Academic Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adolf Grauel. Fuzzy-Logik: Einf’uhrung in die Grundlagen mit Anwendungen. Bibliographisches Institut & F. A. Brockhaus AG, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zadeh, L. A. The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning. Technical Report Memorandum ERL-M 411, Berkeley, Oktober 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zimmermann, Hans-Jürgen. Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rüdiger von Nitzsch. Entscheidung bei Zielkonflikten: Ein PC-gestüztes Verfahren. Dissertation, T. H. Aachen, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shu-Jen Chen and Ching-Lai Hwang. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Karl-Dieter Schwab. Ein auf dem Konzept der unscharfen Mengen basierendes Entscheidungsmodell bei mehrfacher Zielsetzung. Dissertation, T. H. Aachen, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pohl, S. (2006). Using Fuzzy Value Tree Analysis to Support The Verification, Validation, and Accreditation of Models and Simulations. In: Nejat Ince, A., Topuz, E. (eds) Modeling and Simulation Tools for Emerging Telecommunication Networks. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34167-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34167-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-32921-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34167-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics