Advertisement

Riemannian Metric of the Averaged Controlled Kepler Equation

  • B. Bonnard
  • J. -B. Caillau
  • R. Dujol
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 202)

Abstract

A non-autonomous sub-Riemannian problem is considered: Since periodicity with respect to the independent variable is assumed, one can define the averaged problem. In the case of the minimization of the energy, the averaged Hamiltonian remains quadratic in the adjoint variable. When it is non-degenerate, a Riemannian problem and the corresponding metric can be uniquely associated to the averaged problem modulo the orthogonal group of the quadratic form. The analysis is applied to the controlled Kepler equation. Explicit computations provide the averaged Hamiltonian of the Kepler motion in the three-dimensional case. The Riemannian metric is given, and the curvature of a special subsytem is evaluated.

keywords

periodic sub-Riemannian problems averaging Riemannian metrics minimum energy control Kepler equation 

References

  1. [1]
    V. I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Springer-Verlag, New-York, 1978.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Berger, B. Gostiaux. Géométrie différentielle. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1981.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    B. Bonnard, J.-B. Caillau. Riemannian metric of the averaged energy minimization problem in orbital transfer with low thrust. Submitted to Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    B. Bonnard, J.-B. Caillau, R. Dujol. Averaging and optimal control of elliptic Keplerian orbits with low propulsion. Submitted to 13th 1FAC Workshop on Control Applications of Optimisation, Paris, April 2006.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    B. Bonnard, J.-B. Caillau, E. Trélat. Geometric optimal control of elliptic Keplerian orbits. Disc. and Cont. Dyn. Syst. Series B 5(4):929–956, 2005.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    B. Bonnard, M. Chyba. Singular trajectories and their role in optimal control. Math, and Applications 40, Springer Verlag, Paris, 2003.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    F. Chaplais. Averaging and deterministic optimal control. SIAM J. Control and Opt. 25(3):767–780, 1987.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. Epenoy, S. Geffroy. Optimal low-thrust transfers with constraints. Generalization of averaging techniques. Acta Astronautica 41(3): 133–149, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Geffroy. Les techniques de moyennisation en contrôle optimal. Application aux transferts orbitaux à poussée continue. Master thesis, ENSEEIHT, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Gergaud, T. Haberkorn. Homotopy method for minimum consumption orbit transfer problem, ESAIM Control Opt. and Calc. of Var., to appear.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    C. Godbillon. Géométrie différentielle et mécanique analytique. Hermann, Paris, 1985.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Kevorkian, J. D. Cole. Perturbation methods in applied mathematics. Springer Verlag, New-York, 1981.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. G. Peng. Analyse asymptotique et problème homogénéisé en contrôle optimal avec vibrations rapides. SIAM J. Control and Opt. 27(4):673–696, 1989.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    O. Zarrouati. Trajectoires spatiales. CNES-Cepadues, Toulouse, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Bonnard
    • 1
  • J. -B. Caillau
    • 2
  • R. Dujol
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut de mathématiques de Bourgogne, UMR CNRS 5584Dijon
  2. 2.ENSEEIHT-IRIT, UMR CNRS 5505Toulouse

Personalised recommendations