Advertisement

Surgical Energy Sources

  • Bartholomäus Böhm
  • Jeffrey W. Milsom
  • Kiyokazu Nakajima

Keywords

Active Electrode Tissue Temperature Capacitive Coupling Ultrasonic Scalpel Laser Plume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    McKenzie AL. A three-zone model of soft-tissue damage by a CO2 laser. Phys Med Biol 1986;31:967–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walsh JT, Flotte TJ, Anderson RR, et al. Pulsed CO2 laser tissue ablation: effect of tissue type and pulse duration on thermal damage. Lasers Surg Med 1988;8:108–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zweig AD, Meierhofer B, Muller OM, et al. Lateral thermal damage along pulsed laser incisions. Lasers Surg Med 1990;10:262–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hemingway A, McClendon JF. The high frequency resistance of human tissue. Am J Physiol 1932;102:56–59.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zheng E, Shao S, Webster JG. Impedance of skeletal muscle from 1 Hz to 1 MHz. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1984;31:477–481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kanai H, Haeno M, Sakamoto K. Electrical measurement of fluid distribution in legs and arms. Med Prog Technol 1987;12:159–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schroder T, Brackett K, Joffe SN. An experimental study of the effects of electrocautery and various lasers on gastrointestinal tissue. Surgery 1987;101:691–697.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gatti JE, Bryant CJ, Noone RB, et al. The mutagenicity of electrocautery smoke. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:781–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wenig BL, Stenson KM, Wenig BM, et al. Effects of plume produced by the Nd:YAG laser and electrocautery on the respiratory system. Lasers Surg Med 1993;13:242–245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baggish MS, Poiesz BJ, Joret D, et al. Presence of human immunodeficiency virus DNA in laser smoke. Lasers Surg Med 1991;11:197–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baggish MS, Baltoyannis P, Sze E. Protection of the rat lung from the harmful effects of laser smoke. Lasers Surg Med 1988;8:248–253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matchette SL, Vegella TJ, Faaland RW. Viable bacteriophage in CO2 laser plume: aerodynamic size distribution. Lasers Surg Med 1993;13:18–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grainger DA, Soderstrom RM, Schiff SF, et al. Ureteral injuries at laparoscopy: insights into diagnosis, management, and prevention. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:839–843.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Voyles CR, Tucker RD. Education and engineering solutions for potential problems with laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery. Am J Surg 1992;164:57–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tucker RD, Voyles CR, Silvis SE. Capacitive coupled stray currents during laparoscopic and endoscopic electrosurgical procedures. Biomed Instrum Technol 1992;26:303–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, et al. High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc 1998;12:876–878.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Sing RF, et al. Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer. Surg Endosc 2001;15:799–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Emam TA, Cuschieri A. How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection? Ann Surg 2003;237:186–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ninomiya K, Kitano S, Yoshida T, et al. The efficacy of laparosonic coagulating shears for arterial division and hemostasis in porcine arteries. Surg Endosc 2000;14:131–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kanehira E, Omura K, Kinoshita T, et al. How secure are the arteries occluded by a newly developed ultrasonically activated device? Surg Endosc 1999;13:340–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kinoshita T, Kanehira E, Omura K, et al. Experimental study on heat production by a 23.5-kHz ultrasonically activated device for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1999;13:621–625.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barrett WL, Garber SM. Surgical smoke: a review of the literature. Is this just a lot of hot air? Surg Endosc 2003;17:979–987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nduka CC, Poland N, Kennedy M, et al. Does the ultrasonically activated scalpel release viable airborne cancer cells? Surg Endosc 1998;12:1031–1034.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bartholomäus Böhm
    • 1
  • Jeffrey W. Milsom
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kiyokazu Nakajima
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Klinik für Allgemeain-und ViszeralchirurgieHELIOS Klinifum ErfurtErfurtGermany
  2. 2.Section of Colon and Rectal SurgeryNew York Presbyterian HospitalNew York
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York Presbyterian HospitalNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryOsaka Rosai HospitalOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations