Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Selected Readings
Addis KA, Hopper KD, Lyriboz TA, et al. CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:1771–1776.
Batra P, Bigoni B, Manning J, et al. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection at CT angiography. Radiographics 2000;20:309–320.
Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB Jr, Karadi C, Paik DS, Napel S. Display modes for CT colonography. II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies. Radiology 1999;212:203–212.
Black MJ, Sapiro G, Marimont DH, et al. Robust anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Image Process 1998;7(3):421–432.
Choi HS, Choi BW, Choe KO, et al. Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multidetector row CT coronary angiography. Radiographics 2004;24:787–800.
Desser TS, Sommer FG, Jeffrey RB Jr. Value of curved planar reformations in MDCT of abdominal pathology. Am J Roentgenol 2004 June;182(6):1477–1484.
Farag AA, Hassan H, Falk R, et al. 3D volume segmentation of MRA data sets using level sets: image processing and display. Acad Radiol 2004; 11:419–435.
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital Image Processing. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley; 2002.
Kirchgeorg MA, Prokop M. Increasing spiral CT benefits with postprocessing applications. Eur J Radiol 1998;28:39–54.
Napel S, Marks MP, Rubin GD, et al. CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection. Radiology 1992;185:607–610.
Nino-Murcia M, Jeffrey RB Jr, Beaulieu CF, Li KC, Rubin GD. Multidetector CT of the pancreas and bile duct system: value of curved planar reformations. Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:689–693.
Prokop M, Shin HO, Schanz A, Schaefer-Prokop CM. Use of maximum intensity projections in CT angiography: a basic review. Radiographics 1997;17:433–451.
Raman R, Napel S, Rubin GD. Curved-slab maximum intensity projection: method and evaluation. Radiology 2003Oct;229(1):255–260.
Raman R, Napel S, Beaulieu CF, Bain ES, Jeffrey RB Jr, Rubin GD. Automated generation of curved planar reformations from volume data: method and evaluation. Radiology 2002;223:275–280.
Robb RA. Biomedical Imaging, Visualization, and Analysis. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss; 1999.
Roos JE, Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, et al. Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and prospective electrocardiography assisted multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2002;222:271–277.
Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 1994;190:181–189.
Schreiner S, Paschal CB, Galloway RL. Comparison of projection algorithms used for the construction of maximum intensity projection images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:56–67.
Sommer FG, Jeffrey RB Jr, Rubin GD, et al. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:509–513.
Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R. Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision. 2nd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co; 1999.
Suri JS, Setarehdan SK, Singh S. Advanced Algorithmic Approaches to Medical Image Segmentation: State Of The Art Applications in Cardiology, Neurology, Mammography and Pathology. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
Udupa JK. Three-dimensional visualization and analysis methodologies: a current perspective. Radiographics 1999;19:783–806.
van Bemmel CM, Viergever MA, Niessen WJ. Semiautomatic segmentation and stenosis quantification of 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiograms of the internal carotid artery. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:753–760.
van Ooijen PM, Ho KY, Dorgelo J, Oudkerk M. Coronary artery imaging with multidetector CT: visualization issues. Radiographics 2003 Nov–Dec;23(6):e16.
Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IWO, et al. Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 2003;228:878–885.
Whitaker RT, Breen DE, Museth K, et al. A Framework for Level Set Segmentation of Volume Datasets. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Volume Graphics. 159–168, 2001.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2006). 3D Workstations: Basic Principles and Pitfalls. In: MDCT and 3D Workstations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31804-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31804-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-25679-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-31804-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)