Skip to main content
  • 1142 Accesses

4. Summary

Guidance on risk assessment specific to the special characteristics of neural network software is required, and this is not presently available. General frameworks and taxonomies for software probabilistic risk assessment have been proposed, but they are not specific, nor applicable in some instances, to neural networks. This chapter, while limited in its applicability to every safety- and mission-critical neural network system, points out several possible risk assessment techniques as well as useful places to begin considering identification of risks and hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bolt, George Ravuama. 1992. Fault Tolerance in Artificial Neural Networks — Are Neural Networks Inherently Fault Tolerant? D. Phil. Thesis, University of York. Nov.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chillarege, R.; W. L. Kao; and R. G. Condit. 1992. Orthogonal Defect Classification — A Concept for In-Process Measurements. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-18:943–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEEE Std 1012-1998. 1998. IEEE Standard for Software Verification and Validation. New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackall, Dale; Stacy Nelson; and Johann Schumman. 2002. Verification and Validation of Neural Networks for Aerospace Systems. NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and NASA Ames Research Center. June 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackall, Dale; Brian Taylor; et al. 2003. Verification and Validation of Adaptive Neural Networks for Aerospace Systems, Version 1.2 (Draft without Appendices). NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and NASA Ames Research Center. March 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miikkulainen, R.; and M. Dyer. 1988. Encoding Input/Output Representations in Connectionist Cognitive Systems. 1988 Connectionist Models Summer School, Carnegie-Mellon University. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E.; G.E. Hinton; and R.J. Williams. 1986. Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation. In Parallel Distributed Processing, eds. Rumelhart, D.E.; and J.L. McClelland. pp. 318–362. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smidts, Carol; Bin Li; and Ming Li. 2001 Integrating Software into Probabilistic Risk Assessment. NASA report.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pullum, L., Taylor, B.J. (2006). Risk and Hazard Analysis for Neural Network Systems. In: Methods and Procedures for the Verification and Validation of Artificial Neural Networks. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29485-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29485-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-28288-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-29485-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics