Advertisement

Institutional Services for Dynamic Virtual Organizations

  • Henrique L. Cardoso
  • Andreia Malucelli
  • Ana P. Rocha
  • Eugénio Oliveira
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 186)

Abstract

Electronic Institutions are comprehensive frameworks that may effectively help in the collaborative work of virtual organization activities. This paper focuses on an effort to create e-contracting and ontology-based services in the context of Electronic Institutions. The e-contracting services provide automatic specification of business agreements by formalizing them through e-contracts, plus the procedures for enforcing them. Moreover, ontology-based services enable the interoperability between agents representing organizations using different ontologies. Ontology services provide useful advices on how to negotiate specific items, leading to appropriate conversations and making agreements possible. We believe that the rendering of these services will provide a level of trust and normative behavior allowing the creation, through electronic institutions, of dynamic virtual organizations and their operation.

Keywords

Virtual Enterprise Normative Framework Institutional Service Negotiation Protocol Reputation Mechanism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

6. References

  1. 1.
    Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G. “Semantic distance in WordNet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures”. In Proceedings of the Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources, Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Pittsburgh, USA, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. “The Virtual Enterprise Concept”. In L.M. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh (eds.), Infrastructures for Virtual Enterprises: Networking Industrial Enterprises, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–14, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dignum, V., Dignum, F. “Modelling agent societies: co-ordination frameworks and institutions”. In P. Brazdil, A. Jorge (eds.), Progress in Artificial Intelligence: Knowledge Extraction, Multi-agent Systems, Logic Programming, and Constraint Solving, LNAI 2258, Springer, pp. 191–204, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    FIPA — The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, http://www.fipa.orgGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    FIPA OSS — Ontology Service Specification, http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00086/XC00086D.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gennari, J., Musen, M.A., Fergerson, R.W., Grosso, W.E., Crubézy, M., Eriksson, H., Noy, N.F., Tu, S.W., “The Evolution of Protégé: An Environment for Knowledge-Based Systems Development”, Technical Report. SMI Report Number: SMI-2002-0943, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lopes Cardoso, H., Oliveira, E. “Virtual Enterprise Normative Framework within Electronic Institutions”. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop Engineering Societies in the Agents World (ESAW’04), Toulouse, France, 20–22 October 2004.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malucelli, A., Oliveira, E. “Ontology-Services Agent to Help in the Structural and Semantic Heterogeneity”. In Virtual Enterprises and Collaborative Networks, L. M. Camarinha-Matos (ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 175–182, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller, G. “WordNet: A Lexical Database for English”. Communication of ACM, 38(11), pp. 39–41, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milosevic, Z., Linington, P.F., Gibson, S., Kulkarni, S., Cole, J. “Inter-organisational collaborations supported by e-contracts”. In I3E: Fourth IFIP Conference on e-Commerce, e-Business, and e-Government, Toulouse, France, August 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oliveira, E., Rocha, A.P. “Agents Advanced Features for Negotiation in Electronic Commerce and Virtual Organisations Formation Process”. In F. Dignum, C. Sierra (eds.), Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce: The European AgentLink Perspective, LNAI 1991, Springer, pp. 78–97, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rocha, A.P., Lopes Cardoso, H., Oliveira, E. “Contributions to an Electronic Institution Supporting Virtual Enterprises’ Life Cycle”. In G. Putnik, M. M. Cunha (eds.), Virtual Enterprise Integration: Technological and Organizational Perspectives, Idea Group, Inc., 2005.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A. On the design and construction of Agent-mediated Electronic Institutions, Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suguri, H., Kodama, E., Miyazaki, M., Nunokawa, H., Noguchi, S. “Implementation of FIPA Ontology Service”. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems, 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents. Montreal. Canada. 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrique L. Cardoso
    • 1
  • Andreia Malucelli
    • 1
  • Ana P. Rocha
    • 1
  • Eugénio Oliveira
    • 1
  1. 1.LIACC — NIAD&R, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations