Skip to main content

Monitoring Forest Restoration Projects in the Context of an Adaptive Management Cycle

  • Chapter

Keywords

  • Adaptive Management
  • Biodiversity Indicator
  • Project Team Member
  • Sand Hill
  • Excel Workbook

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • DOI: 10.1007/0-387-29112-1_20
  • Chapter length: 5 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • ISBN: 978-0-387-29112-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Conservation Measures Partnership (CMP). 2004a. Rosetta Stone of Conservation Practice. www.conservationmeasures.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservation Measures Partnership (CMP). 2004b. Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation. www.conservationmeasures.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, S., Carden, F., and Smutylo, T. 2001. Outcome Mapping. IDRC, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecological Restoration Institute and the U.S.D.A. Collaborative Forest Restoration Programme. 2004. Handbook FIVE. Monitoring Social and Economic Effects of Forest Restoration. USDA, Washington, DC, and Ecological Restoration Institute, Flagstaff, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J.M., and Whitman, A.A. 2004. A primer on selecting biodiversity indicators for forest sustainability: simplifying complexity. Forest Conservation Programme of Manomet Center for Conservation Science. FMSN-2004-1. www. manometmaine.org/indicators/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartanto, H., Lorenzo, M.C.B., and Frio, A.L. 2002. Collective action and learning in developing a local monitoring system. International Forestry Review 4(3): 84–195.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Margoluis, R., and Salafsky, N. 1998. Measures of Success: Designing, Managing and Monitoring Conservation and Development Projects. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provencher, L., Litt, A.R., Galley, K.E.M., et al. 2001. Restoration of fire-suppressed long leaf pine sandhills at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. Final report to the Natural Resources Management Division, Eglin Air Force Base, Niceville, Florida. The Science Division, The Nature Conservancy, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, S.C., and Poole, G.C. 2002. Putting monitoring first: designing accountable ecosystem restoration and management plans. In: Montgomery, D.R., Bolton, S., Booth, D.B., and Wall, L. eds. Restoration of Puget Sound Rivers. UW Press, Seattle,WA, pp. 222–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzer, D., and Salafsky, N. (In press). Allocating resources between taking action, assessing status, and measuring effectiveness of conservation actions. Natural Areas Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stem, C., Margoluis, R., Salafsky, N., and Brown, M. 2005. Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: A review of trends and approaches. Conservation Biology, 19(2): 1–15.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy (TNC). 2004. The Enhanced 5-S Project Management Process. Links to guidance and the Excel Workbook are available at http://www.conserveonline.org/2004/ 03/a/Enhanced_5S_Resources.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Reading

  • Brown, R.J., Agee, J.K., and Franklin, J. 2004. Forest restoration and fire: principles in the context of place. Conservation Biology 18(4): 903–912.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, A.B., Thysell, D.R., and Brodie, A.W. 1999. The forest ecosystem study: background, rationale, implementation, baseline conditions and silvicultural assessment. USDA General Technical Report. PNW-6TR-451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, C. 2003. Drafting a Conservation Blueprint. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.N., Holthausen, R., Shannon, M.A., and Sedell, J., 1999. Case study. In: Johnson, K.N., Swanson, F., Herring, M., and Greene, S., eds. Bioregional Assessments. Island Press, Covelo, California. pp. 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, J.B., Beschta, R.L., Otting, N., and Lytjen, D. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22(5): 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb. D., Parotta, J., Keenan, R., and Tucker, N. 1997. Rejoining habitat remnants: restoring degraded rainforest lands. In: Laurance, W.F., and Bierregaard, R.O., Jr., eds. Tropical Forest Remnants. pp. 366–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D.J., 1999. Regional and continental restoration. In: Soulé, M.E., and Terborgh, J., eds. Continental Conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 65–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Connor, S., Salafsky, N., Salzer, D. (2005). Monitoring Forest Restoration Projects in the Context of an Adaptive Management Cycle. In: Forest Restoration in Landscapes. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29112-1_20

Download citation