Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Information Systems Development pp 1–13Cite as

System Co-Development Through Requirements Specification

  • Conference paper

  • 716 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. W. Malone, R. Laubacher, and M. S. S. Morton, Inventing the Organizations of the 21st Century (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.-W. Scheer and A. Hars, Extending data modelling to cover the whole enterprise, Communications of the ACM 35(9), 166–175 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. W. Scheer, ARIS — Business Process Frameworks (Springer, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Lundeberg, “The ISAC approach to specification of information systems and its application to the organisation of an IFIP working conference,” in: Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review, edited by T. W. Olle, H. G. Sol, and A. A. Verrijn-Stuart (IEEE Computer Society Press, North-Holland, 1982), pp. 273–234.

    Google Scholar 

  5. IDEF0, “Integration Definition for Function Modeling (IDEF0),” Computer Systems Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology FIPS Pub 183 (December 21, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. S. K. Yu and J. Mylopoulos, Using goals, rules and methods to support reasoning in business process reengineering, Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 5(2) (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. I. Anton, W.M. McCracken, and C. Potts, Goal Decomposition and Scenario Analysis in Business Process Reengineering, in: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’94), edited by G. Wijers, S. Brinkkemper, and T. Wasserman (Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1994), 94–104.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. van Lamsweerde, Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Guided Tour, in: Proceedings of 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, RE’01 (Toronto, 2001), pp. 249–263.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Rolland, C. Souveyet, and C. Ben Achour, Guiding goal modeling using scenarios, IEEE Trnansactions on Software Engineering 24(12), 1055–1071 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Rolland, G. Grosz, and K. Regis, Experience with Goal-Scenario Coupling in Requirements Engineering, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (Limerick, Ireland, 1999), pp. 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Loucopoulos and E. Kavakli, Enterprise modelling and the teleological approach to requirements engineering, International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 4(1), 45–79 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Kavakli and P. Loucopoulos, Goal-driven business process analysis — application in electricity deregulation, Information Systems 24(3), 187–207 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Coughlan and R. D. Macredie, effective communication in requirements elicitation: a comparison of methodologies, Requirements Engineering 7(2), 47–60 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Loucopoulos, The S3 (Strategy-Service-Support) Framework for Business Process Modelling, in: Proceedings of Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Business Process Support (REBPS’03), edited by J. Eder, R. Mittermeir, and B. Pernici (Klagenfurt/Velden, Austria, 2003), pp. 378–382.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. D. Galliers, Towards a flexible information architecture: integrating business strategies, information systems strategies and business process redesign, Journal of Information Systems 3(3), 199–213 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Leymann and W. Altenhuber, Managing business processes as an information resource, IBM Systems Journal 33(2), 326–348 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Ould, Business Processes: Modelling and Analysis for Re-engineering and Improvement (Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Fuxman, L. Liu, M. Pistore, M. Roveri, and J. Mylopoulos, Specifying and Analysing Early Requirements: Some Experimental Results, in: Proceedings of 11th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (Monterey Bay, California, USA, 2003), pp. 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Fuxman, J. Mylopoulos, M. Pistore, and P. Traverso, Model Checking Early Requirements Specifications in Tropos, in: Proceedings of 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (Toronto, Canada, 2001), pp. 174–181.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Nuseibeh and S. Easterbrook, Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap, in: Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on on Software Engineering (Limerick, Ireland, 2000), pp. 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. B. Checkland, Soft Systems Methodology: A 30-year Retrospective, New edition (Chichester, Wiley, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. M. Richmond, Systems Thinking: Critical Thinking Skills for the 1990s and beyond, System Dynamics Review 9(2), 113–133 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Walsham, Virtual organization: an alternative view, Information Society 10(4), 289–292 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. D. Sterman, Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. W. Forrester, Principles of Systems (Waltham, MA, Pegasus Communications Inc., 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. M. Carroll, Scenarios and Design Cognition, in: Proceedings of IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE’02), edited by E. Dubois and K. Pohl (Essen, Germany, 2002), pp. 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. Aune, Knowledge of the External World (Routledge, London, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  28. E. Kavakli and P. Loucopoulos, “Goal Modelling in Requirements Engineering: Analysis and Critique of Current Methods,” in: Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies, edited by J. Krogstie, T. Halpin, and K. Siau (IDEA Group Inc., 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Loucopoulos and N. Prekas, A Framework for Requirements Engineering Using System Dynamics, in: Proceedings of 21st International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, New edition (York City, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. F. Andersen, G. P. Richardson, and J. A. M. Vennix, Group model building: adding more science to the craft, System Dynamics Review 13(2), 187–201 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. A. M. Vennix, Group model-building: tackling messy problems, System Dynamics Review 15(4), 379–401 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Fowler, Simulations’s Evolving Role in Management, in: Proceedings of 1996 International System Dynamics Conference, edited by G. P. Richardson and J. D. Sterman (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996), pp. 162–165.

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. F. Wolstenholme, Decision Analysis Using Dynamic Simulation, in: Proceedings of System Dynamics’ 95, edited by T. Shimada and K. Saeed (Tokyo, 1995), pp. 937–945.

    Google Scholar 

  34. C. Urquhart, Analysts and clients in organisational contexts: a converstational perspective, Strategic Information Systems 10(3), 243–262 (2001).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. B. Curtis, H. Krasner, and N. Iscoe, A field study of the software design process for large systems, CACM 31(11), 1268–1287 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  36. S. Kennedy, Why users hate your attitude, Informatics, pp. 29–32 (February 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  37. B. Bashein and M. I. Markus, A credibility equation for IT specialists, Sloan Management Review 38(4), 35–44 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computation, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 88, Manchester, M60 1QD, UK

    Pericles Loucopoulos

Authors
  1. Pericles Loucopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Vilnius Gedinimas Technical University, Sauletekio 11, LT-10223, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Olegas Vasilecas

  2. Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, Idaho, 83725, USA

    Wita Wojtkowski  & W. Gregory Wojtkowski  & 

  3. Systems Development Laboratory, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, 4000, Kranj, Slovenia

    Jože Zupančič

  4. Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Akademijos 4, LT-08663, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Albertas Caplinskas

  5. Department of Information Systems, University of Gdansk, 81-824, Sopot, Armii Krajowej 119/121, Poland

    Stanisław Wrycza

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Loucopoulos, P. (2005). System Co-Development Through Requirements Specification. In: Vasilecas, O., Wojtkowski, W., Zupančič, J., Caplinskas, A., Wojtkowski, W.G., Wrycza, S. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28809-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28809-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-25026-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-28809-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation