This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
I owe these references to Linda Daniell and John Benseman of Auckland.
For the most recent (and indeed only) full-length study of NFE since the 1970s, Poizat 2003, see footnote on p.5 above.
For example, the work of Ezeomah on education with nomadic groups in Nigeria speaks of “experiments to bring formal education to nomadic Fulani in Nigeria” (Ezeomah 1985) when many of his programmes would be called by others NFE — e.g. “the type of education suited to the nomadic Fulani lifestyle and related to their culture”, p. 11.
There is one reference to “non-formal (vocational) training programmes” in Buchert 1992: 162–164, but the report normally uses the distinction between formal and informal vocational training (p. 171). There are also mentions of “both the formal and nonformal sides of primary education” (p. 191), and of “nonformal skills training” (p. 194).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2005). The End of the Debate. In: Non-Formal Education. CERC Studies in Comparative Education, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28693-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28693-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24636-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-28693-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)