Skip to main content
  • 1644 Accesses

Abstract

Remedial approaches and options for the Neponset River in Southeaster Massachusetts are described. The advantages of combining restoration, in particular restoration of the river as an ecological resource, with remediation is identified. Dredging and capping are identified as possible remedial approaches. Dredging in the small areas be hind the dams where PCBs are concentrated was identified as potentially very effective. Capping over larger areas requiring remediation was also identified as effective and also as contributing directly to improvement in habitat values for the river.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • National Research Council (NRC), 2001. A Risk Management Strategy for PCB-contaminated Sediments, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, M. R., S. Maynord, J. Miller, and D. Reible, 1998. Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (ARCS) Program, Guidance for In situ Subaqueous Capping of Contaminated Sediments, EPA 905-B96-004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reible, D.D., D. Hayes, C. Lue-Hing, J. Patterson, N. Bhowmik, M. Johnson, and J. Teal, “Comparison of the Long-Term Risks of Removal and In situ Management of Contaminated Sediments in the Fox River,”, Journal of Soil and Sediment Contamination, 12(3) 325–344 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Edward J. Calabrese Paul T. Kostecki James Dragun

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reible, D.D. (2006). Options for the Neponset. In: Calabrese, E.J., Kostecki, P.T., Dragun, J. (eds) Contaminated Soils, Sediments and Water., vol 10. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28324-2_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics