Abstract
Remedial approaches and options for the Neponset River in Southeaster Massachusetts are described. The advantages of combining restoration, in particular restoration of the river as an ecological resource, with remediation is identified. Dredging and capping are identified as possible remedial approaches. Dredging in the small areas be hind the dams where PCBs are concentrated was identified as potentially very effective. Capping over larger areas requiring remediation was also identified as effective and also as contributing directly to improvement in habitat values for the river.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
National Research Council (NRC), 2001. A Risk Management Strategy for PCB-contaminated Sediments, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Palermo, M. R., S. Maynord, J. Miller, and D. Reible, 1998. Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (ARCS) Program, Guidance for In situ Subaqueous Capping of Contaminated Sediments, EPA 905-B96-004.
Reible, D.D., D. Hayes, C. Lue-Hing, J. Patterson, N. Bhowmik, M. Johnson, and J. Teal, “Comparison of the Long-Term Risks of Removal and In situ Management of Contaminated Sediments in the Fox River,”, Journal of Soil and Sediment Contamination, 12(3) 325–344 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reible, D.D. (2006). Options for the Neponset. In: Calabrese, E.J., Kostecki, P.T., Dragun, J. (eds) Contaminated Soils, Sediments and Water., vol 10. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28324-2_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28324-2_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-28322-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-28324-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)