Skip to main content

Learning and Framing in Social Exchange

  • Chapter
Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Social Justice ((CISJ))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andreoni, J. (1988). Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aunger, R. (2001). Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B.P., and Schaufeli, W.B. (1999). Reciprocity in interpersonal relationships: An evolutionary perspective on its importance for health and well-being. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 259–291). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J.L. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 163–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.D., and Holt, C.A. (1993). Experimental economics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flache, A., and Macy, M.W. (2002). Stochastic collusion and the power law of learning: A general reinforcement learning model of cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(50), 629–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J.W. (1971). A non-cooperative equilibrium for supergames. Review of Economic Studies, 38, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and Levine, D. (1998). The theory of learning in games. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligthart, P.E.M. (1995). Solidarity in economic transactions. An experimental study of framing effects in bargaining and contracting. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (1988). Contractual relations and weak solidarity: The behavioral basis of restraints on gain maximization. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 144, 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (1998). Solidarity: Its microfoundations and macro-dependence. A framing approach. In P. Doreian and T.J. Fararo (Eds.), The problem of solidarity: Theories and models (pp. 61–112). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (2001). Social rationality versus rational egoism. In J.H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 635–668). New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M.W. (1991). Learning to cooperate: Stochastic and tacit collusion in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 808–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M.W., and Flache, A. (2002). Learning dynamics in social dilemmas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, May 14, 99(10), 7229–7236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., and Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlau, P. (2000). The governance of the employment relation. A relational signaling perspective. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbell, J.M., and Dawes, R.M. (1991). A “cognitive miser” theory of cooperators’ advantage. American Political Science Review, 85, 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., and Chammah, A.M. (1965). Prisoner’s dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1990). Games real actors could play. Rationality and Society, 2, 471–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1992). Decision making and problem solving. In M. Zey (Ed.), Decision making: Alternatives to rational choice models (pp. 32–53). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, Y.N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E.L. (1911). Animal Intelligence. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flache, A., Macy, M.W. (2006). Learning and Framing in Social Exchange. In: Fetchenhauer, D., Flache, A., Buunk, B., Lindenberg, S. (eds) Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28032-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics