Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Historical Overview

  • Joo Young Melissa Lee
  • Elizabeth A. Morris


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, et al. MR imaging of the breast using Gd-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986;10:199–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989;71:95–103.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA-preliminary observations. Radiology 1989;170:681–686.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd MB, et al. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology 1990;174:491–494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadoliniun-enhanced turboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994;193:777–781.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994;191:625–631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, et al. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994;190:485–493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 1995;197:387–395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211:101–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siegmann KC, Muller-Schimpfle M, Schick F, et al. MR imaging-detected breast lesions: histopathologic correlation of lesion characteristics and signal intensity data. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1403–1409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harms S, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993;187:493–501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brinck U, Fischer U, Korabiowska M, et al. The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1331–1334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gallardo X, Sentis M, Castaner E, et al. Enhancement of intramammary lymph nodes with lymphoid hyperplasia: a potential pitfall in breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 1998;8: 1662–1665.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997;202:833–841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic highspatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:35–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:171–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Orel SG. Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast: are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor? Radiology 1999;211:5–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joo Young Melissa Lee
    • 1
  • Elizabeth A. Morris
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyMontclair Breast CenterMontclairUSA
  2. 2.Breast Imaging Section, Department of RadiologyMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations