Skip to main content

Effects of differences in the accent and gender of competing voices on speech segregation

  • Conference paper
Auditory Signal Processing
  • 1252 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Assmann, P.F. (1999) Vocal tract size and the intelligibility of competing voices. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J. and Cooke, M. (1999) Is the sine-wave speech cocktail party worth attending? Speech Comm. 27, 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregman, A.S. (1990) Auditory Scene Analysis. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, T.D. and Opie, J.M. (1992) The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence perception. Perc. and Psychophys., 52, 437–445.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Culling, J.F. and Colburn H.S. (2000) Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 517–527.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.J. and Hukin, R.W. (2000) Effects of reverberation on spatial, prosodic, and vocal-tract size cues to selective attention. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 335–342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marean, G.C. Werner, L.A. and Kuhl, P.K. (1992) Vowel categorization by very young infants. Developmental Psych. 28, 397–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B.C.J. and Glasberg, B.R. (1983) Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 750–753.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G.E. and Barney, H.L. (1952) Control methods used in a study of the vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 24, 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R. (1986) A signal-to-noise ratio method for the speech-reception SRT of the hearing impaired. J. Sp. Hear. Res. 29, 146–154.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Remez, R.E., Rubin, P.E., Berns, S.M., Pardo, J.S. and Lang, J.M. On the perceptual organization of speech. Psych. Rev. 101, 129–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remez, R.E., Rubin, P.E., Pisoni, D.P., and Carrell, T.D. (1981) Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science 212, 947–950.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothauser, E.H., Chapman, W.D., Guttman, N., Nordby, K.S., Silbiger, H.R., Urbanek, G.E. and Weinstock, M. (1969) I.E.E.E. recommended practice for speech quality measurements. IEEE Trans. Aud. Electroacoust. 17, 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Culling, J.F., Porter, J.S. (2005). Effects of differences in the accent and gender of competing voices on speech segregation. In: Pressnitzer, D., de Cheveigné, A., McAdams, S., Collet, L. (eds) Auditory Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27045-0_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics