Examination of the Placenta


Umbilical Cord Placental Tissue Intervillous Space Normal Placenta Single Umbilical Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ACOG: Placental Pathology. Committee Opinion. 102:1–2, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. Altshuler, G.: Placental pathology clues for interdisciplinary clarification of fetal disease. Trophobl. Res. 13:511–525, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. Altshuler, G. and Hyde, S.: Fusobacteria: an important cause of chorioamnionitis. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 109:739–743, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Altshuler, G. and Hyde, S.: Clinicopathologic implications of placental pathology. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 39:549–570, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bacsich, P. and Smout, C.F.V.: Some observations on the foetal vessels of the human placenta with an account of the corrosion technique. J. Anat. 72:358–364, 1938.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartholomew, R.A., Colvin, E.D., Grimes, W.H., Fish, J.S., Lester, W.M. and Galloway, W.H.: Criteria by which toxemia of pregnancy may be diagnosed from unlabeled formalin-fixed placentas. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 82:277–290, 1961.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, V. and Bleyl, U.: Placentarzotte bei Schwangerschaftstoxicose und fetaler Erythroblastose im fluorescenzmikroskopischen Bilde. Virchows Arch. (Pathol. Anat.) 334:516–527, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bejar, R., Wozniak, P., Allard, M., Benirschke, K., Vaucher, Y., Coen, R., Berry, C., Schragg, P., Villegas, I. and Resnik, R.: Antenatal origin of neurologic damage in newborn infants. I. Preterm Infants. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 159:357–363, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. Benirschke, K.: Examination of the placenta. Obstet. Gynecol. 18:309–333, 1961a.Google Scholar
  10. Benirschke, K.: Twin placenta and perinatal mortality. New York State J. Med. 61:1499–1508, 1961b.Google Scholar
  11. Boe, F.: Studies on vascularization of the human placenta. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. (Suppl. 5) 32: 1–92, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Booth, V.J., Nelson, K.B., Dambrosia, J.M. and Grether, J.K.: What factors influence whether placentas are submitted for pathologic examination? Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 176:567–571, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouw, G.M., Stolte, L.A.M., Baak, J.P.A. and Oort, J.: Quantitative morphology of the placenta. 1. Standardization of sampling. Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 6:325–331, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crawford, J.M.: Vascular anatomy of the human placenta. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 84:1543–1567, 1962.Google Scholar
  15. Driscoll, S.G.: Choriocarcinoma: An “incidental finding” within a term placenta. Obstet. Gynecol. 21:96–101, 1963.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, C.C., Garrett, W. and Kossoff, G.: Placental aging monitored by gray scale echography. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 124:483–488, 1976.Google Scholar
  17. Fox, H.: Pathology of the Placenta. 2nd edition. Saunders, London, 1997.Google Scholar
  18. Frank, H.G., Malekzadeh, F., Kertschanska, S., Crescimanno, C., Castellucci, M., Lang, I., Desoye, G. and Kaufmann, P.: Immunohistochemistry of two different types of placental fibrinoid. Acta Anat. 150:55–68, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritschek, F.: Über “leere” Placentarhohlräume. Anat. Anz. 64:65–73, 1927.Google Scholar
  20. Fujikura, T.: Placental calcification and maternal age. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 87:41–45, 1963a.Google Scholar
  21. Fujikura, T.: Placental calcification and seasonal difference. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 87:46–47, 1963b.Google Scholar
  22. Geller, H.F.: Über die Bedeutung des subchorialen Fibrinstreifens in der menschlichen Placenta. Arch. Gynäkol. 192:1–6, 1959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gruenwald, P.: Examination of the placenta by the pathologist. Arch. Pathol. 77:41–46, 1964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gruenwald, P. and Minh, H.N.: Evaluation of body and organ weights in perinatal pathology. II. Weight of body and placenta of surviving and of autopsied infants. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 82:312–319, 1961.Google Scholar
  25. Heifetz, S.A.: Single umbilical artery. A statistical analysis of 237 autopsy cases and review of the literature. Perspect. Pediatr. Pathol. 8:345–378, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hyrtl, J.: Die Blutgefässe der Menschlichen Nachgeburt unter Normalen und Abnormen Verhältnissen. Braumüller, Vienna, 1870.Google Scholar
  27. Jauniaux, E. and Campbell, S.: Ultrasonographic assessment of placental abnormalities. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 163:1650–1658, 1990.Google Scholar
  28. Jeacock, M.K., Scott, J. and Plester, J.A.: Calcium content of the human placenta. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 87:34–40, 1963.Google Scholar
  29. Jiricka, Z. and Preslickova, M.: The effect of fixation on staining of placental tissue. Z. Versuchstierk. 16:127–130, 1974.Google Scholar
  30. Kaufmann, P.: Der osmotische Effekt der Fixation auf die Placentastruktur. Verh. Anat. Ges. 74:351–352, 1980.Google Scholar
  31. Kaufmann, P.: Influence of ischemia and artificial perfusion on placental ultrastructure and morphometry. Contrib. Gynecol. Obstet. 13:18–26, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Langston, C., Kaplan, C., MacPherson, T., Manci, E., Peevy, K., Clark, B., Murtagh, C., Cox, S. and Glenn, G.: Practice guidelines for examination of the placenta. Developed by the placental pathology practice guideline development task force of the College of American Pathologists. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 121:449–476, 1997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Las Heras, J., Micheli, V. and Kakarieka, E.: Placental pathology in perinatal deaths. Modern Pathol. 7(1):abstract 26 (p. 5P), 1994.Google Scholar
  34. Lucas, A., Christofides, N.D., Adran, T.E., Bloom, S.R. and Aynsley-Green, A.: Fetal distress, meconium, and motilin. Lancet i:718, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller, P.W., Coen, R.W. and Benirschke, K.: Dating the time interval from meconium passage to birth. Obstet. Gynecol. 66:459–462, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Moessinger, A.C., Blanc, W.A., Marone, P.A. and Polsen, D.C.: Umbilical cord length as an index of fetal activity: Experimental study and clinical implications. Pediatr. Res. 16:109–112, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Naeye, R.L.: Maternal floor infarction. Hum. Pathol. 16:823–828, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Naeye, R.L.: Functionally important disorders of the placenta, umbilical cord, and fetal membranes. Hum. Pathol. 18:680–691, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Panigel, M.: Placental perfusion experiments. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 84:1664–1683, 1962.Google Scholar
  40. Priman, J.: A note on the anastomosis of the umbilical arteries. Anat. Rec. 134:1–5, 1959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pritchard, J.A., MacDonald, P.C. and Gant, N.F.: Williams Obstetrics, 17th ed. Appleton Century Crofts, Norwalk, CT, 1985.Google Scholar
  42. Reece, E.A., Scioscia, A.L., Pinter, E., Hobbins, J.C., Green, J., Mahoney, M.J. and Naftolin, F.: Prognostic significance of the human yolk sac assessed by ultrasonography. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 159:1191–1194, 1988.Google Scholar
  43. Salafia, C.M. and Vintzileos, A.M.: Why all placentas should be examined by a pathologist in 1990. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 163:1282–1293, 1990. (See discussion Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 165:783–784, 1991.)Google Scholar
  44. Schatz, F.: Die Gefässverbindungen der Placentakreisläufe eineiiger Zwillinge, ihre Entwicklung und ihre Folgen. Arch. Gynäkol. 27:1–72, 1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schremmer, B.-N.: Gewichtsveränderungen verschiedener Gewebe nach Formalinfixierung. Frankfurt. Z. Pathol. 77:299–304, 1967.Google Scholar
  46. Snoeck, J.: Le Placenta Humain. Masson & Cie, Paris. 1958.Google Scholar
  47. Torpin, R. and Hart, B.F.: Placenta bilobata. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 42:38–49, 1941.Google Scholar
  48. Travers, H. and Schmidt, W.A.: College of American Pathologists Conference XIX on the Examination of the Placenta. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 115:660–731, 1991. (This is a composite of many articles by numerous authors).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Voigt, S., Kaufmann, P. and Schweikhart, G.: Zur Abgrenzung normaler, artefizieller und pathologischer Strukturen in reifen menschlichen Plazentazotten. II. Morphometrische Untersuchungen zum Einfluss des Fixationsmodus. Arch. Gynäkol. 226:347–362, 1978.Google Scholar
  50. Walker, J.: Weight of the human fetus and of its placenta. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 19:39–40, 1954.Google Scholar
  51. Zeek, P.M. and Assali, N.S.: Vascular changes in the decidua associated with eclamptogenic toxemia of pregnancy. Amer. J. Clin. Pathol. 20:1099–1109, 1950.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Personalised recommendations