Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahmed, S (1966) “On the Theory Induced Innovation,” Economic Journal, 76, 344–57.
Drandakis E.M. and E.S. Phelps, (1966) “A Model of Induced Invention, Growth and Distribution,” Economic Journal, 76, 823–40.
Habakkuk, H.J. (1962) The American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hicks, J.R. (1932) Theory of Wages. London: McMillian and Co.
Jone, H.G. (1976) An Introduction to Modern Theories of Economic Growth, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Kamine, M.I and N.L. Schwartz (1969) “Induced Factor Augmenting Technological Progress from a Microeconomic Viewpoint,” Econometrica, 37, 668–84.
Kennedy, C. (1960) “Induced bias in Innovation and And the Theory of Distribution,” Economic Journal, 74, 541–7
Lucus, Jn., R.E. (1993) “Making a Miracle,” Econometrica, 61, 251–72.
Mantoux, P. (1961) The Industrial Revolution in the Eighteenth Century. New York: Harper and Row.
MacLeod, C (1988) Inventing the Industrial Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Mokyar, J (1990) The Lever of Riches. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nordhaus, W.D. (1969) Invention, Growth and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pilat, D (1994) The Economics of Rapid Growth: The Experience of Japan and Korea, Edward Elgar.
Romer, P (1986) “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 94 1002–37.
Rothbarth, E. (1946) “Causes of the Superior Efficiency of U.S.S Industry as compared with British Industry,” Economic Journal, 56, 383–90.
Rutten, V. W. (1997) “Induced Innovation, Evalutionary Theory and Path Dependence: Sources of Technical Change,” Economic Journal, 107, 1520–29.
Samuelson, P.S. (1965) “A Theory of Induced Innovation along Kennedy-Weisäker lines,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 345–56.
Sato, R (1970) “The estimation of biased technical progress and the production function,” Internatinal Economic Review, 11, 179–208. Reprinted in Growth Theory and Technical Change: The Selected Essays of Ryuzo Sato (Economics of the Twentieth Century), Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1996, Chapter 12.
Sato, R., and R.V. Ramachandran (1998) “Optimal Growth with Endogenous Technical Progress: Hicksian Bias in a Macro-Model,” The Japanese Economic Review, Forthcoming 1999.
Sato, R., R.V. Ramachandran, and C. Lian (1998)) “A Model of Optimal Economic Growth with Endogenous Bias,” Macroeconomic Dynamics, Forthcoming 1999.
Salter, W.E.G. (1960) Productivity and Technical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sato, R. and R. Ramachandran (1987) “Factor Price Variation and the Hicksian Hypothesis: A Microeconomic Model,” Oxford Economic Papers, 39, 343–356.
Weizäcker, C.C. (1966) “A Tentative Note on a Two-Sector Model of Induced Technical Progress,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 245–51.
Wright, G., (1997) “Towards a More Historical Approach to Technological Change,” Economic Journal, 107, 1560–65.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2006). Estimation of Biased Technical Progress. In: Biased Technical Change and Economic Conservation Laws. Research Monographs in Japan-U.S. Business & Economics, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26376-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26376-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-26055-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-26376-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)