Advertisement

Corporate Governance in Transition Economies: The Theory and Practice of Corporate Governance in Eastern Europe

Abstract

Corporate governance issues are especially important in transition economies, since these countries do not have the long-established financial institution infrastructure to deal with corporate governance issues. Before the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was no need to discuss corporate governance issues because all enterprises were owned by the state and there were no shareholders. All that has changed since 1989. This paper discusses how transition economies are dealing with corporate governance issues and the extra obstacles they have to overcome due to a lack of established financial institution infrastructure. Several case studies from Eastern Europe are examined.

Keywords

Corporate Governance Transition Economy Audit Committee Minority Shareholder Corporate Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous. 2001a. Minority What? Economist, February 24, 2001, 358(8210), 72.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous, (December 2000/January 2001). S&P Devises Scoring System for Corporate Governance Risk. Central European, December 2000/January 2001, 10(10), 20–21.Google Scholar
  3. Black, Bernard. 2000. Does Corporate Governance Matter? A Crude Test Using Russian Data. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, June, 149(6), 2131–2150.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. British Accounting Association Corporate Governance Special Interest Group website http://www.baacgsig.qub.ac.uk/ Google Scholar
  5. Buck, T. 2003. Modern Russian Corporate Governance: Convergent Forces or Product of Russia’s History? Journal of World Business, 38(4), 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cadbury, A., et al. 1992. (The Cadbury Report) Report of the Committee on Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, December 1, London: Gee Publishing Ltd. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/htinl/fpd/privatesector/cg/docs/cadbury.pdf.Google Scholar
  7. Center for International Private Enterprise. 2002. Instituting Corporate Governance in Developing, Emerging and Transitional Economies: A Handbook. Washington, DC: The Center for International Private Enterprise. www.cipe.org.Google Scholar
  8. Corporate Monitoring http://www.corpmon.com/ Google Scholar
  9. Davis Global Advisors. Leading Corporate Governance Indicators, Newton, MA: Davis Global Advisors. Annual publication. http://www.davisglobal.com/publications/lcgi/index.html Google Scholar
  10. Encyclopedia of Corporate Governance http://www.encycogov.com/ Google Scholar
  11. European Corporate Governance Institute website http://www.ecgi.org/ Google Scholar
  12. European Corporate Governance Institute link to Codes http://www.ecgi.org/codes/all_codes.htm Google Scholar
  13. Feinberg, P. 2000. Historically Indifferent Russia Starts to Heed Corporate Governance Rules, Pensions & Investments, November 13, 28(23), 18–19.Google Scholar
  14. Filatotchev, I., T. Buck and V. Zhukov. 2000. Downsizing in Privatized Firms in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 286–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Filatotchev, I., M. Wright, K. Uhlenbruck, L. Tihanyi and R. Hoskisson. 2003. Governance, Organizational Capabilities, and Restructuring in Transition Economies. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Global Corporate Governance Forum http://www.gcgf.org/ Google Scholar
  17. Greenbury, R. et al. 1995. (Greenbury Report). Directors’ Remuneration: Report of a Study Group Chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury, London: Gee Publishing Ltd., July 17. Available at http://www.baacgsig.qub.ac.uk/ Google Scholar
  18. Gregory, Holly L. 2000. International Comparison of Corporate Governance Guidelines and Codes of Best Practice: Investor Viewpoints, New York: Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Egon Zehnder International.Google Scholar
  19. Haigh, Art. 2001. We View Russia’s Future with Optimism. Kommersant-Daily, January 26 [www.pwcglobal.ru/].Google Scholar
  20. Hampel Committee. 1998. Hampel Committee Report, London: Gee Publishing Ltd., January. Available at http://www.ecgi.org/codes/country_documents/uk/liampel_index.htm Google Scholar
  21. Independent Directors Association website www.independentdirector.ru Google Scholar
  22. Independent Directors Association. 2003. Independent Director Code (April 15 Draft), Moscow: Independent Directors Association. Available at www.independentdirector.ru.Google Scholar
  23. Institute of Corporate Law and Corporate Governance website www.iclg.ru Google Scholar
  24. Institute of Corporate Law and Corporate Governance 2002. Managing Corporate Governance Risks in Russia, Moscow: Institute of Corporate Law and Corporate Governance, May.Google Scholar
  25. Institute of International Finance. 2002. Policies for Corporate Governance and Transparency in Emerging Markets. February. www.iif.com/data/public/NEWEAG_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  26. International Corporate Governance Network website http://www.icgn.org/ Google Scholar
  27. International Finance Corporation, Russia Corporate Governance Project website http://www2.ifc.org/rcgp/english.htm Google Scholar
  28. Iskyan, K. 2002. Clean-up Time in Russia. Global Finance, February, 32–35.Google Scholar
  29. Judge, W.Q., I. Naoumova & N. Kutzevol. 2003. Corporate Governance in Russia: An Empirical Study of Russian Managers’ Perception. Paper presented at the Gorbachev Foundation Conference on Corporate Governance in Transition Economies held at Northeastern University, Boston, April 2003. Published in Journal of World Business, November, 2003, 38(4), 385–396 under the title Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Russia: An Empirical Study.Google Scholar
  30. McCarthy, D.J. and S.M. Puffer. 2003. Corporate Governance in Russia: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCarthy, D.J. and S.M. Puffer. 2002. Corporate Governance in Russia: Towards a European, US, or Russian Model? European Management Journal 20(6), 630–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Metzger, B., Dean, R.N. and Bloom, D. 2002. Russia’s Code of Corporate Conduct: An Innovative Approach to Solving Shareholder Rights Abuses. The Corporate Governance Advisor, March/April 10(2), 12–17.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, S. 2002. Law and Order Makes its Mark. Banker, March 152(913), 44–45.Google Scholar
  34. Monks, R.A.G. & N. Minow, (Eds) 2004. Corporate Governance, third edition, London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Muravyev, A. 2001. Turnover of Top Executives in Russian Companies. Russian Economic Trends 10(1), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. National Association of Corporate Directors website http://www.nacdonline.org/ Google Scholar
  37. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development website http://www.oecd.org/document/62/0,2340,en_2649_37439_1912830_1_1_1_37439.00.html Google Scholar
  38. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2003. White Paper on Corporate Governance in South Eastern Europe, Paris: OECD. www.oecd.org.Google Scholar
  39. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2003. Survey of Corporate Governance Developments in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  40. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2002. White Paper on Corporate Governance in Russia, Paris: OECD, April 15. Available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/10/3/2789982.pdf.Google Scholar
  41. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1999. Principles of Corporate Governance, Paris: OECD. Available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/50/4347646.pdf.Google Scholar
  42. Peng, M., T. Buck and I. Filatotchev. 2003. Do Outside Directors and New Managers Help Improve Firm Performance? An Exploratory Study in Russian Privatization. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pistor, K., M. Raiser and S. Gelfer. 2000. Law and Finance in Transition Economies. Economics of Transition, 8(2), 325–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Puffer, S.M. and D.J. McCarthy. 2003. The Emergence of Corporate Governance in Russia. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 284–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robertson, C.J., K.M. Gilley and M.D. Street. 2003. The Relationship between Ethics and Firm Practices in Russia and the United States. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roth, K. and T. Kostova. 2003. Organizational Coping with Institutional Upheaval in Transition Economies. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 314–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Russian Corporate Governance Roundtable website http://www.corp-gov.org/ Google Scholar
  48. Russian Institute of Directors website www.rid.ru Google Scholar
  49. Russian Institute of Directors. 2003. Structure and Activities of Boards of Directors of Russian Joint-Stock Companies. Moscow: Russian Institute of Directors. www.rid.ru Google Scholar
  50. Russian Institute of Directors. 2002. Corporate Governance Code, Moscow: Russian Institute of Directors, April 5. www.rid.ru.Google Scholar
  51. Wagner, J., J. Stimpert & E. Fubara. 1998. Board Composition and Organizational Performance: Two Studies of Insider/Outsider Effects. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5), 655–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. World Bank Corporate Governance website http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/privatesector/cg/ Google Scholar
  53. World Bank and International Monetary Fund. 2003. Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment: Hungary, Washington, DC: World Bank and International Monetary Fund, February.Google Scholar
  54. World Bank and International Monetary Fund. 2001. Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment: Republic of Croatia, Washington, DC: World Bank and International Monetary Fund, September.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Personalised recommendations