Abstract
The paper identifies five major global trends that are likely to impact agricultural biodiversity conservation and the adoption of agricultural biotechnologies. The trends covered include trade and capital market liberalization, the rise of the environmental movement, consumerism, privatization and devolution of government services, and the emergence of the information age. We find that trade liberalization is likely to lead to increased incentives and capacity for biotechnology adoption, with unclear but potentially negative impacts on agricultural biodiversity. Environmentalism has generated a system of environmental governance and regulation, which may come into conflict with those established under global trade agreements. However, the way in which these disputes will be resolved is still unclear, but it will likely have important implications for both agricultural biotechnology and biodiversity. The rise in consumer power associated with increased incomes and the expansion of markets will affect biotechnology adoption through two opposing effects: the expression of consumer concerns about environmental and food safety, balanced against the delivery of quality characteristics that biotechnology can deliver. Privatization in the agricultural research and development sector increases incentives for the development of agricultural biotechnologies, but may create barriers to their adoption in developing countries, while the privatization of environmental services generates increased incentives for biodiversity conservation. Rapid improvements in information technologies increase the capacity for effective biodiversity conservation and are fundamental components of the development of biotechnologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alston, J. M, Pardey, P. G., Smith, V. H., 2000, Financing agricultural R&D in rich countries: What’s happening and why, in: Public-Private Collaboration in Agricultural Research: New Institutional Arrangements and Economic Implications, K. O. Fuglie and E. Schimmelpfennig, eds., Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp. 25–54.
Anderson, K., and Nielsen, C. P., 2001, GMOs, food safety and the environment: What role for trade policy and the WTO, in: Tomorrow’s Agriculture: Incentives, Institutions, Infrastructure and Innovations, G. H. Peters and P. Pingali, eds., Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, Aldershot, Hampshire, pp. 61–85.
Becker, G. S., 1965, A theory of allocation of time, Econ. J., 75:493–517
Berdegué, J. A., Balsevich, F., Flores, L., and Reardon, T., 2003, The Rise of Supermarkets in Central America: Implications for Private Standards for Quality and Safety of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables. Final report for USAID-RAISE/SPS project.
Bruinsma, J., ed., 2003, World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030. FAO and Earthscan Publications Ltd., Rome and London.
Brush, S., 1999, Genetic erosion of crop populations in centers of diversity: A revision, paper presented at the Technical Meeting on the Methodology of the FAO World Information and Early Warning System on Plant Genetic Resources held at the Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague, Czech Republic (June 21–23, 1999); http://apps3.fao.org/wiews/Prague/
Byerlee, D., and Echeverria, R. G., 2002, Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of Privatization, CABI Publishing, Cambridge, Mass., 320p.
Correa, C, 1999, Access to plant genetic resources and intellectual property rights background, study paper number 8. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO Rome.
Cropper, M. L., Evans, W. N., Berardi, S. J., Ducla-Soares, M. M., and Portney, P. R., 1992, The determinants of pesticide regulation: A statistical analysis of EPA decisionmaking, J. Polit. Econ. 100:175–198.
Crucible Group, 1994, People, Plants, and Patents: The Impact of Intellectual Property on Trade, Plant Biodiversity, and Rural Society, IDRC Online Book http://network.idrc.ca/
Damania, R., Fredriksson, P. G., and List, J. A., 2003, Trade liberalization, corruption, and environmental policy formation: Theory and evidence, J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 46(3):490–512.
Deacon, R., 1999, Political economy of environment-development relationships: A preliminary framework, Department of Economics, University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series 1089.
FAO, 1998, The State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO, Rome.
FAO, 2004, The State of Food and Agriculture: 2003–04, FAO, Rome.
Gollin, D., 1998, Valuing farmers’ rights, in: Agricultural Values of Plant Genetic Resources, R. E. Evenson, D. Gollin, and V. Santaniello, eds., CABI Publishing, Wallingford, U. K.
Helfer, L., 2002, Intellectual Property Rights in Plant Varieties: An Overview with Options for National Governments, FAO Legal Papers Online #31 http://www.fao.org/Legal/prs-ol/lpo31-2.pdf, FAO, Rome.
Jayne, T. S., Villareal, M., and Pingali, P., 2004, Interactions between the agricultural sector and the HIV/AIDS pandemic: Implications for agricultural policy, ESA working paper, FAO, Rome.
Josling, T., 1999, The WTO and its potential role in GMO regulations, in: The Economics and Politics of Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture: Implications for WTO 2000, G. Nelson, ed., Bulletin 809, University of Illinois Board of Trustees, Urbana-Champaign.
Laxminarayan, R., ed., 2002, Battling Resistance to Antibiotics and Pesticides: An Economic Approach, Resources for the Future, Washington, D. C.
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G, and Swift, M. J., 1997, Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties, Science 25(277):504–509.
National Research Council, 1997, Precision Agriculture in the 21st Century: Geospatial and Information Technologies in Crop Management, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
Oates, W. E., and Baumol, W. J., 1996, The instruments for environmental policy, in: The Economics of Environmental Regulation, W. E. Oates, ed., Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K., pp. 91–124.
Parker, D., and Zilberman, D., 1993, Hedonic estimation of quality factors affecting the farm-retail margin, Amer. J. Agri. Econ. 75:458–466.
Pray, C. E., and Umali-Deininger, D., 1998, The private sector in agricultural research systems: Will it fill the gap? World Dev. 26(6):1127–1148.
Reardon, T., Timmer, P., Barrett, C., and Berdegué, J., 2003, The rise of supermarkets in Africa, Asia and Latin America, Amer. J. Agri. Econ. 85(5): 1140–1146.
Rissler, J., and Mellon, M., 1996, The Ecological Risks of Engineered Crops, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Welch, R. M., and Graham, R. D., 2002, Breeding crops for enhanced micronutrient content, Plant and Soil 245(1):205–214.
Wolf, S., 1998, Privatization of crop production information service markets: Spatial variation and policy implications, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Wright, B. D., 1998, Intellectual property and farmers’ rights, in: Agricultural Values of Plant Genetic Resources, R. E. Evenson, D. Gollin, and V. Santaniello, eds., CABI Publishing, Wallingford, U. K., pp. 219–232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zilberman, D., Lipper, L. (2005). Major Processes Shaping the Evolution of Agriculture, Biotechnology, and Biodiversity. In: Cooper, J., Lipper, L.M., Zilberman, D. (eds) Agricultural Biodiversity and Biotechnology in Economic Development. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 27. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25409-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25409-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-25407-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-25409-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)