Agricultural Biotechnology: Concepts, Evolution, and Applications

Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 27)


Without being exhaustive, this chapter covers the main principles that are the basis of all methods of genetic improvement and relates these principles to the modern methods of plant biotechnology. It explains why the modern procedures are an extension of the old principles and how they fit together. Besides it discusses evolution and its relation with plant improvement and with biotechnology. It also discusses most of the regular biosafety concerns that relate to genetically modified organisms and shows that in many cases these concerns can be dealt with by the knowledge of the biology and evolution of the species that was modified. It also shows that some of the biosafety concerns are true for any new genotype, be it genetically modified or not. It ends by assessing the current status of agricultural biotechnology and by addressing the implications drawn for its application to developing countries.

Key words

biosafety biotechnology evolution genetically modified organisms plant improvement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allard, R. W., 1960, Principles of Plant Breeding, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 485p.Google Scholar
  2. Champoux, M. C, Wang, G., Sarkarung, S., MacKill, D. J., O’Toole, J. C, Huang, N., and McCouch, S. R., 1995, Locating genes associated with root morphology and drought avoidance in rice via linkage to molecular markers, Theor. Appl. Genet. 90:969–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 2003, Briefing Room: Agricultural Biotechnology, Scholar
  4. Falconer, D. S., 1960, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Ronald Press, New York, 570p.Google Scholar
  5. FAO, 2001, Los organismos modificados genéticamente, los consumidores, la inocuidad de los alimentos y el medio ambiente, Estudio FAO, Cuestiones de Etica 2, 26p.Google Scholar
  6. Farias, J. C, Anjos, J. R. N., Costa, A. F., Sperandio, C. A., and Costa, C. L., 1996, Doenças causadas por virus e seu controle, in: Cultura do Feijoeiro Comum no Brasil, R. S. Araujo, C. A. Rava, L. F. Stone, and M. J. de O. Zimmermann, POTAFOS, Piracicaba, S.P. Brazil, pp. 731–760.Google Scholar
  7. Futuyma, D. J., 1979, Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associated, Inc., Sunderland, Massachussets, 565p.Google Scholar
  8. GM Science Review Panel, 2003, GM Science Review, First Report: An open review of the science relevant to GM crops and food based on the interests and concerns of the public, Report submitted to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, United Kingdom (July, 2003); Scholar
  9. Harlan, J. R., 1975, Crops and Man, American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, Madison, 294p.Google Scholar
  10. McCouch, S. R., Kochert, G., Yu, Z. H., Khush, G. S., Coffman, W. R., and Tanksley, S. D., 1988, Molecular mapping of rice chromosomes, Theor. Appl. Genet. 76:815–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McLean, M., Frederick, R., Traynor, P., Cohen, J., and Komen, J., 2002, A conceptual framework for implementing biosafety: Linking policy, capacity and regulation, ISNAR Briefing Paper 47, ISNAR, The Hague; PDF/ISNAR%20Briefing%20Paper%2047.pdf.Google Scholar
  12. Nakano, M., and Mii, M., 1990, Somatic hybridization between Dianthus chinensis and D. barbarus through protoplast fusion, Japanese J. of Breeding 40,Supplement 1:26–27.Google Scholar
  13. Nestle, M., 2002, Food Politics, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  14. Ohgawara, T., Kobayashi, S., Ishii, S., Yoshinaga, K., and Oiyama, I., 1989, Somatic hybridization in citrus navel orange (C. sinensis Osb.) and grapefruit (C. paradisi Macf.), Theor. Appl Genet. 78:609–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramalho, M. A. P., Dos Santos, J. B., and Zimmermann, M. J. de O., 1993, Genética quantitativa em plantas autógamas. Aplicações ao Melhoramento do Feijoeiro. ed. Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil, 271 p.Google Scholar
  16. The Crucible Group, 1994, People, Plants, and Patents: Impact of Intellectual Property on Trade, Plant Biodiversity, and Rural Society, IDRC, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 117p.Google Scholar
  17. UNEP/CBD/94/1, 1998, Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annexes, OACI, Canada, 34p.Google Scholar
  18. Vavilov, N. I., 1951, The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants, translated from the Russian by K. S. Chester. Chronica Botanica Vr. 1/6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FAO-OCDRomaItalia
  2. 2.Genetica AgrariaUniversita della TusciaViterboItalia

Personalised recommendations