Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of New Institutional Economics pp 349–370Cite as

Solutions to Principal-Agent Problems in Firms

  • Chapter

Keywords

  • Moral Hazard
  • Credible Commitment
  • Golden Parachute
  • Cash Poster
  • Residual Owner

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, George A. 1982. “Labor Contracts as a Partial Gift Exchange”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 96(4): 543–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, George A. and Janet L. Yellen. 1986. Efficiency Wage Models of the Labor Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, Amiya, Rajiv Lal, V. Srinivasan, and Richard Staelin. 1985. “Salesforce Compensation Plans: An Agency Theoretic Perspective”. Marketing Science 4: 267–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Sandra E. and Lisa M. Lynch. “Howto Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity”. Review in Economics and Statistics 83: 434–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm”. Economica 4: 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlon, Edward J. and Judi McLean Parks. 1990. “Effects of Monitoring and Tradition on Compensation Arrangements: An Experiment with Principal-Agent Dyads”. The Acadamy of Management Journal 33: 603–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, Kathleen. 1988. “Agency and Institutional-Theory Explanations: The Case of Retail Sales Compensation”. Academy of Management Journal 31: 488–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, Tor. 1999. “Executive Compensation and Tournament Theory: Empirical Tests on Danish Data”. Journal of Labor Economics 17: 262–280.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran, Mukesh and Ashok Kotwal. 1984. “The Moral Hazard of Budget Breaking”. Rand Journal of Economics 15(4): 578–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falaschetti, Dino. 2002. “Golden Parachutes, Credible Commitments or Evidence of Shirking?” Journal of Corporate Finance 8: 161–180.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Falaschetti, Dino and Gary Miller. 2001. “Constraining Leviathan: Moral Hazard and Credible Commitment in Constitutional Design”. Journal of Theoretical Politics 13(4): 389–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garen, John. 1994. “Executive Compensation and Principal-Agency Theory”. Journal of Political Economy 102: 1175–1199.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor, Martin and M. Pauly. 1990. “Compensation and Productive Efficiency in Partnerhsips: Evidence from Medical Group Practice”. Journal of Political Economy 98: 544–574.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Milton and Artur Raviv. 1979. “Optimal Incentive Contracts with Imperfect Information”. Journal of Economic Theory 20: 231–259.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Barton H., Jack Nickerson, and Hideo Owan. 2003. “Team Incentives and Worker Heterogeneity”. Journal of Political Economy 111: 465–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, L. 1988. “All Eyes on Du Pont's Incentive-Pay Plan”. Wall Street Journal 1: p. A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, Bengt. 1979. “Moral Hazard and Observability”. Bell Journal of Economics 10:74–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. “Moral Hazard in Teams”. Bell Journal of Economics 13: 324–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, Bengt and Paul Milgrom. 1994. “The Firm as an Incentive System”. American Economic Review 84: 972–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G.C. 1954. “The Cash Posters”. American Sociological Review 19: 724–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael and Kevin Murphy. 1990. “Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives”. Journal of Political Economy 98(2): 225–264.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Kissan and Alex Thevaranjan. 1998. “Monitoring and Incentives in Sales Organizations: An Agency-Theoretic Perspective”. Marketing Science 7: 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Charles and Gur Huberman. 1988. “Two-Sided Uncertainty and Up-or-Out Contracts”. Journal of Labor Economics 6: 423–444.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Jeffrey and John W. Slocum. 1987. “Managing Corporate Culture Through Reward Systems”. Academy of Management Executive 1: 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knez, Marc and Duncan Simester. 2001. “Firm Wide Incentives and Mutual Monitoring at Continental Airlines”. Journal of Labor Economics 19: 743–772.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, Edward E. 1986. High-Involvement Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, Edward. 1981. “Agency, Earnings Profiles, Productivity, and Hours Restrictions”. American Economic Review 71(4): 606–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, Edward. 1989. “Pay Equality and Industrial Politics”. Journal of Political Economy 97: 561–580.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, Edward. 1996. “Performance Pay and Productivity”. NBER Working Paper 5672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, Edward and Shewin Rosen. 1981. “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimal Labor Contracts”. Journal of Political Economy 89: 841–864.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, Aleen and Robert Tollison. 1980. “Free Riding, Shirking and Team Production in Legal Partnerships”. Economic Inquiry 18: 380–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul. 1988. “Employment Contracts, Influence Activities, and Efficient Organizational Design”. Journal of Political Economy 96: 42–60.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Gary J. 1992. Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Gary J. and Andrew B. Whitford. 2002. “Trust and Incentives in Principal-Agent Negotiations”. Journal of Theoretical Politics 14: 231–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalebuff, Barry and Joseph Stiglitz. 1983. “Prizes and Incentives: Towards a General Theory of Compensation and Contracts”. Bell Journal of Economics 14: 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W.G. 1980. “Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans”. Administrative Science Quarterly 25:124–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast. Canice. 1999. “The Provision of Incentives in Firms”. Journal of Economic Literature 37: 7–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, Roy. 1985. “Repeated Principal-Agent Games with Discounting”. Econometrica 53:1173–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff, Daniel. 1988. “Wage Determination and the Five-Dollar Day at Ford”. Journal of Economic History 48: 389–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappington, David E.M. 1991. “Incentives in Principal-Agent Relationships”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, Steven. 1979. “Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principal and Agent Relationship”. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, Andre and Lawrence Summers. 1988. “Hostile Takeovers as Breaches of Trust” in Alan Auerbach (ed.). Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Michael and Richard Zeckhauser. 1971. “Insurance, Information, and Individual Action”. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 61: 380–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. 1974. “Risk Sharing and Incentives in Sharecropping”. Review of Economic Studies 61: 219–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strausz, Roland. 1997. “Delegation of Monitoring in a Principal-Agent Relationship”. Review of Economic Studies 64: 337–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, Jean. 1986. “Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations”. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organisation 2: 181–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Gary J. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Paris (Pantheon-Sorbonne), France

    Claude Menard

  2. The Ronald Coase Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA

    Mary M. Shirley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, G.J. (2005). Solutions to Principal-Agent Problems in Firms. In: Menard, C., Shirley, M.M. (eds) Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25092-1_15

Download citation

search

Navigation