Skip to main content

Industrial R&D Laboratories: Windows on Black Boxes?

  • Chapter

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the survey-based literature on industrial Research and Development (R&D) laboratories, beginning with the work of Edwin Mansfield. Topics covered include R&D projects, new products, and new processes; the appropriability of intellectual property; the limits of the firm in R&D; and spillovers of knowledge from other firms and universities into the laboratories. I discuss the value of collecting information from industrial R&D managers, who participate in a wide range of R&D decisions and are the natural best source of information on these decisions. I also emphasize gaps in our knowledge concerning R&D from past studies, such as the private and social returns to R&D, the nature of firms’ R&D portfolios, and other topics. The paper closes with a discussion of the benefits from building a national database on R&D laboratories that could be shared among researchers and that could take this area of research to a new and higher level of achievement.

Key words

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acemoglu, D. and J. Linn, 2004, ‘Market Size in Innovation: Theory and Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (August), 1049–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J.D., 1990, ‘Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth,’ Journal of Political Economy 98, (August), 673–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J.D., 2002, ‘Comparative Localization of Academic and Industrial Spillovers,’ Journal of Economic Geography 2 (July), 253–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J.D., 2005, ‘Learning, Internal Research, and Spillovers: Evidence from a Sample of R&D Laboratories,’ Working Paper, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, October Forthcoming in Economics of Innovation and New Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J.D., E.P. Chiang, and J.L. Jensen, 2003, ‘The Influence of Federal Laboratory R&D on Industrial Research,’ Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (November), 1003–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J.D., E.P. Chiang, and K. Starkey, 2001, ‘Industry-University Co-operative Research Centers,’ Journal of Technology Transfer 26, (January) 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J.D. and M. Marcu, 2004, ‘R&D Sourcing, Joint Ventures, and Innovation: A Multiple Indicators Approach,’ Cambridge, Massachusetts, NBER Working Paper W10474, May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., 1996, ‘Contracting for Tacit Knowledge: the Provision of Technical Services in Technology Licensing Contracts,’ Journal of Development Economics 50, 233–256.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, P., 2003, ‘Acquiring Knowledge Within and Across Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Clinical Development,’ Cambridge, Massachusetts, NBER Working Paper 10083, November 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizan, O., 2003, ‘The Determinants of Success of R&D Projects: Evidence from American-Israeli Research Alliances,’ Research Policy 32, 1619–1640.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, I.M. and R.M. Henderson, 1994, ‘Racing to Invest? The Dynamics of Competition in the Ethical Drugs Industry,’ Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 3, 481–519.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J.P. Walsh, 2000, ‘Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not),’ National Bureau Of Economic Research. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Working Paper No. 7552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J.P. Walsh, 2002, ‘Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D,’ Management Science 48, 1–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K. and R.S. Pindyck, 1994, Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., 1992, ‘The Search for R&D Spillovers,’ Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R.M. and I.M. Cockburn, 1996, ‘Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery,’ RAND Journal of Economics 27,(Spring) 32–59.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B., 1989, ‘Real Effects of Academic Research,’ American Economic Review 79, (December) 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klevorick, A.K., R.C. Levin, R.R. Nelson, and S.G. Winter, 1995, ‘On the Sources and Significance of Inter-industry Differences in Technological Opportunities,’ Research Policy 24, 185–205.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R.C, A.K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson, and S.G. Winter, 1987, ‘Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development,’ Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987 (3), 783–820.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N., 1988, ‘Mergers and Acquisitions as a Source of Innovation,’ Mergers & Acquisitions 23, (November–December) 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N. and L. Bauer, 1989, Co-operative Research in U.S. Manufacturing, Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1985, ‘How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?’ Journal of Industrial Economics 34, (December) 217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1991, ‘Academic Research and Industrial Innovation,’ Research Policy 20, 1–12.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1995a, ‘Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics, and Financing,’ Review of Economics and Statistics 77, (February) 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1995b, Innovation, Technology, and the Economy, Volumes I and II: The Selected Essays Of Edwin Mansfield, Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. and G. Beardsley, 1978, ‘A Note on the Accuracy of Industrial Forecasts of the Profitability of New Products and Processes,’ Journal of Business 51, 127–135.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. and R. Brandenburg, 1966, ‘The Allocation, Characteristics, and Outcome of the Firm’s Research and Development Portfolio: A Case Study,’ Journal of Business 39, 447–164

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., J. Rapoport, A. Romeo, S. Wagner, and G. Beardsley, 1977, ‘Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 91, (May) 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., M. Schwartz, and S. Wagner, 1981, ‘Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study,’ Economic Journal 91, 907–918.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D.C., 1992, ‘International Collaborative Ventures and the Commercialization of New Technologies,’ in Technology and the Wealth of Nations, N. Rosenberg, R. Landau, and D. Mowery, (eds.), Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D.C., 1995, ‘The Boundaries of the U.S. Firm in R&D,’ in Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise, N. Lamoreaux and D. Raff, (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press for NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G.P., 1990, ‘The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis,’ Administrative Science Quarterly 35, (March) 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., 2005, ‘Edwin Mansfield: An Appreciation,’ Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1–2), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.S., 2003, ‘Data Requirements for Assessing the Private and Social Returns to Strategic Research Partnerships: Analysis and Recommendations,’ Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 15, 207–225.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.S., P. Westhead, and M. Wright, 2003, ‘Assessing the Impact of University Science Parks on Research Productivity: Exploratory Firm-Level Evidence from the United Kingdom,’ International Journal of Industrial Organization 21, 1357–1369.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stix, G., 2004, ‘A Confederacy of Smarts,’ Scientific American 290, (June) 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J., Marshal’s Tendencies: What Can Economists Know? Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press; and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., 1977, ‘Technology Transfer by Multi-National Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How,’ Economic Journal 87, (June) 242–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E., 1988, Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adams, J.D. (2005). Industrial R&D Laboratories: Windows on Black Boxes?. In: Link, A.N., Scherer, F.M. (eds) Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25022-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics