Skip to main content

University R&D and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Italy

  • Chapter
  • 1175 Accesses

Abstract

Ed Mansfield wrote several papers on the private returns to basic research (e.g. Mansfield, 1980) and the influence of academic research on industrial innovation (e.g. Mansfield, 1991). We extend this line of research by assessing the impact of university research on total factor productivity growth of Italian manufacturing firms. The econometric analysis is based on reduced-form estimation of the R&D capital stock model, including controls for two potential sources of sample selection bias, as proposed by Crepon et al. (1998) and Piga and Vivarelli (2004). Our results suggest that while there are positive returns to collaborative research with other firms, collaborative research with universities does not appear to directly stimulate productivity. We interpret this result as consistent with recent evidence (e.g. Hall et al. 2001, 2003) suggesting that firms engage in collaborative research with universities when appropriability conditions are weak.

Key words

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barnow, B.S., G.G. Cain, and A.S. Goldberger, 1981, ‘Issues in the analysis of selection bias’ in E. Stromsdorfer and G. Farkas, (eds.), Evaluation Studies Review, San Francisco, Ann.5, Sage, 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal, 1989, ‘Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D,’ The Economic Journal 99(3), 569–596.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crepon, B., E. Duguet, and J. Mairesse, 1998, ‘Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level,’ Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7(2), 115–158.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H., 2003, Econometric Analysis, 5th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., 1979, ‘Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth,’ Bell Journal of Economics 10, 92–116.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., 1986, ‘Productivity, R&D and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970’s,’ American Economic Review 76(1), 141–154.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., A.N. Link, and J.T. Scott, 2001, ‘Barriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Universities: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program,’ Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 87–98.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., A.N. Link, and J.T. Scott, 2003, ‘Universities as Research Partners,’ Review of Economics and Statistics 85(2), 485–491.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M., and I. Zang, 2000, ‘Meet me Halfway: Research Joint Ventures and Absorptive Capacity,’ International Journal of Industrial Organization 18(7), 995–1012.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F., and D. Siegel, 1991, ‘The Impact of R&D Investment on Productivity — New Evidence Using R&D — LRD Data,’ Economic Inquiry 29(2), 203–228.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N., 1981, ‘Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing: Additional Evidence,’ American Economic Review 71(5) 1111–1112.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A., and D.S. Siegel, 2003, Technological Change and Economic Performance, London and New York, NY: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Los, B., and B. Verspagen, 2000, ‘R&D Spillovers and Productivity: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing Microdata,’ Empirical Economics 25, 127–148.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1968, Industrial Research and Technological Change, New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1980 ‘Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing,’ American Economic Review 70, 863–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1991, ‘Academic Research and Industrial Innovation,’ Research Policy 20(1), 1–12.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., J. Rapoport, A. Romeo, S. Wagner, and G. Beardsley, 1977, ‘Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 91, 221–240.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Medda, G., C.A. Piga, and D.S. Siegel, 2004, ‘Assessing the Returns to Collaborative Research: Firm-Level Evidence from Italy,’ Rensselaer Department of Economics Working Paper #0416, June 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piga, C.A. and M. Vivarelli (2004). ‘Internal and External R&D: A Sample Selection Approach,’ Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66(4), 457–482.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schankerman, M., 1981, ‘The Effects of Double-Counting and Expensing on the Measured Returns to R&D,’ Review of Economics and Statistics 63, 454–458.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., 1982, ‘Inter-industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth,’ Review of Economics and Statistics, 6, 627–634.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Medda, G., Piga, C., Siegel, D.S. (2005). University R&D and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Italy. In: Link, A.N., Scherer, F.M. (eds) Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25022-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics