Advertisement

The Role of Consumers in Environmental Successes

  • Eivind Stø
  • Harald Throne-Hoist
  • Gunnar Vittersø
Chapter

Keywords

Nordic Country Consumer Research Laundry Detergent Sustainable Consumption Voluntary Agreement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aftenposten (1984). Norge først i Europa? Krav om blyfri bensin i salg fra 87 / Norway to lead the way in Europe. A claim for availability of unleaded gasoline from 1987. Aftenposten, Morning edition, 22.11.1984: 38.Google Scholar
  2. Aftenposten (1991). Stadig flere kjører blyfritt / More and more choose unleaded. Aftenposten, Morning edition, 21.02.1991: 19.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitude and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bijker, W.W., Hughes, T.P. & Pinch, T. (1990). The social construction of technological system. London and Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brendehaug, E. & Groven, K. (2000). Økologi og marknad. Ein studied av rasjonalitet iproduksjon og marknadsføring av økologisk mjølk og kjøt. VF-rapport 2/00. Vestlandsforskning, Sogndal.Google Scholar
  8. Dulsrud, A, (1996). Konsentrasjon i nordisk dagligvarehandel. Nord 1996:19, København: Nordisk Ministerråd.Google Scholar
  9. Enger, A. (1995). Recycling. Consumers' attitude and action (English summary). Report no. 11/95. Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  10. Enger, A. (1998). Environmental claims in marketing (English summary). Report no 1/98. Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  11. Eriksen, E.O. & Weigård J. (1993). Fra statsborger til kunde: Kan relasjonen mellom innbyggeme og det offentlige reformuleres på grunnlaag av nye rolle. Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift, 9(2), 111–131.Google Scholar
  12. Evang, K. (1969). Blybensin/ Leaded gasoline. Letter to Norsk Texaco OilA/S, dated 8.12.1969.Google Scholar
  13. Forbrukerrådet (1973). Innstilling og vedtak fra Rådsmøte nr.9/1973 / Recommandation and resolution from Council meeting, sak nr. 125 Utkast til nye forskrifter om bruk av bensin tilsatt bly, 18.09.1973.Google Scholar
  14. Forbrukerrrådet (1979). Innstilling og vedtak fra Rådsmøte nr. 9/1979 / Recommandation and resolution from Council meeting, sak nr. 119 Forskrifter for omsetning og bruk av motorbensin tilsatt blyforbindeler, 14.11.1979.Google Scholar
  15. Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Selfand society in late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grønmo S,, Ölander F, & Danielsen A. (1991). Konsumentiflyende i samhället — en referenseram för empiriska undersøkningar. Nord-rapport 1991:13. København: Nordisk Ministerräd.Google Scholar
  17. Halkier B. (1999). Consequences of the politicization of consumption: The example of environmentally friendly consumption practices. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 1, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harland, P., Staats, H. & Wilke, H. (1999). Explaining pro-environmental intention and behaviour by personal norms and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2505–2528.Google Scholar
  19. Heater D. (1990). Citizenship. The civic ideal in world history, politics and educations. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  20. Henningsen A. (1980). Brev til Varefaktakomiteen. Letter to Varefaktakomiteen. Dated 17.07.1980.Google Scholar
  21. Hirschman A.O. (1970). Exit, voice & loyalty, response to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Holmwood, J (1993). Welfare and citizenship. In: R. Bellamy(Ed.), Theories and concepts of politics. An introduction, pp. 98–123. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ilmonen, K. & Sto, E. (1996). The production of the “consumer” in the Nordic consumer political discourse. In: J. Holmwood, H. Radner, G. Schulze & P. Sulkunen (Eds.), Constructing the new consumer society. London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Jänicke M & Weidner H. (1995). Successful environmental policy. A critical evaluation of 24 cases. Berlin: Ed. Sigma.Google Scholar
  25. Kaiser, F., Wolfing, S. & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kjærnes U & Stø E. (1996). The political legitimacy of consumer interests.. Paper presented at the ESA Working group, Sociology of Consumption, Tallinn, Estonia August 29–31.Google Scholar
  27. Kjellberg G. (1982). Overvåking av Mjøsa. Bakgrunnsdata, historikk og videreføring /Monitoring of lake Mjøsa. Background data, history and continuation. Overvåkingsrapport 54/82. NIVA-Report. Oslo.Google Scholar
  28. Klaassen, C.D. (1996). Casarett and Doull's toxicology. The basic science of poisons, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Konsumentverket (1979). Yttrande Över betänkande “Bensin utan bly” avgivet av arbetsgruppen för blyfri bensin / Opinion on the report “Unleaded gasoline” given by the working group on unleaded gasoline. Letter to Jordbruksdepartementet/ The Swedish Ministry of Agriculture. Dated 29.11.1979.Google Scholar
  30. Lavik R. (1990). Det vanskelige valget. Working report no 14/90, Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  31. Lavik R. (1997). Miljøengasjement i endring? Working report no 7/97. Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  32. Lindblom, C.E. (1977). Politics and markets. The world's political-economic systems. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Lindblom, C.E. (2001). The market system. What it is, how it works and what to make of it. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Majone, G (1996) Regulating Europe London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Majone G (1999) The Regulatory State and Its Legitimacy Problems. Journal of West European Politics, 22, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  36. Meehan E. (1993). Citizenship and the European Community. London, Newbury Park, New Dehli: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Micheletti, M., Follesdal, A. & Stolle, D. (Eds.), (2004) Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
  38. Michelsen, J., Hamm, U., Wynwn, E. & Roth, E. (1999). The European market for organic products: Growth and development. Organic farming in Europe: Economics and Policy Volume 7. Stuttgart: Universität Hohenheim, Institut für Landwirtschaftliche Betriebslehre.Google Scholar
  39. Mishra, R, (1990). The welfare state in capitalist society. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo and Singapore: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  40. Nadal A. (1998). Conditions of development of a product ecolabel. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  41. NAF (1973). Utkast til nye forskrifter om bruk av bensin tilsatt bly/ Draft for new regulations on the use of leaded gasoline, Letter to Samferdselsdep. (The Norwegian Ministry of Communications). Dated 07.11.1973.Google Scholar
  42. Nordic Council of Ministers (1999). Nordiska konsumenter om Svanen — livsstil, kännedom, attityd och förtroende (Nordic consumers about the Swan — life style, knowledge, attitude and confidence). Copenhagen: TemaNord 1999:592.Google Scholar
  43. Nordic Council of Ministers (2001). Evaluation of the environmental effects of the Swan eco-label — Final analysis. Copenhagen: TemaNord 2001:516.Google Scholar
  44. Nordic Eco-labelling Body (2000). Evaluation of Nordic ecolabelling. Part C. Description of the Nordic eco-labelling scheme from an environmental perspective/ May 2000. Original: Evaluering av Nordisk Miljømerking. Del C. Beskrivelse av det nordiske miljømarkingssystemet fra et miljøsynspunkt.Google Scholar
  45. NP, Norsk Petroleumsinstitutt (1973). Utkast til nye forskrifter om bruk av bensin tilsatt bly / Comments on a draft proposal to new regulations the use of leaded gasoline). Letter to Sosialdepartementet (The Norwegian Ministry of Health). Dated 28.09.1973.Google Scholar
  46. NP, Norsk Petroleumsinstitutt (1978). Blyfri bensin — Statens forurensningstilsyns brev av 3.7.1978 / Unleaded gasoline — the letter from The Norwegian Pollution Control Authority. Working paper sent to SFT (The Norwegian Pollution Control Authority).Google Scholar
  47. NP, Norsk Petroleumsinstitutt (1985). Forskrifter om helse-og miljøfarlige stoffer i motorbensin / Regulations of compounds in gasoline detrimental to health and environment. Letter to SFT (The Norwegian Pollution Control Authority). Dated 10.06.1985.Google Scholar
  48. Nyberg A. (1999). Miljømonitor. Stabilitet og ending i forbrukernes miljøengasjement/ Environmental monitoring. Stability and changes in consumers' Environmental Commitment. Report nr. 6/99. Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  49. Octel (2000). 4. January. Octel Corp. Lead in Gasoline. Available: http://www.octel-corp.com/leadin.htm. Email: webmaster@octel-corp.com [Webmaster].Google Scholar
  50. Pestoff, V.A. (1999). Beyond the market and state. Brookfield USA: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  51. Rask Jensen, H. (1984). Forbrugerpolitik og organiseret forbrugerarbejde. København: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  52. Rask Jensen, H. (1986). The relevance of alternative paradigms as guidelines for consumer policy and organized consumer action. Journal of Consumer Policy 9, 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Russell, J. & Millstone, E. (1995). Reduction of lead emissions in the UK. In: M. Jänicke & H. Weidner (Eds.), Successful environmental policy. A critical evaluation of 24 cases. PP. 223–245. Berlin: Ed. Sigma.Google Scholar
  54. Sagdahl, R. (1999). Mindre miljøskadelige gamle biler?/ Less environmentally damaging old cars?, Forbruker-rapporten, 5,9, 1999.Google Scholar
  55. Schwartz, S.H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In: L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol 10, pp. 221–279. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  56. Stearns, P.N. (2001). Consumerism in world history. The global transformation of desire. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Strandbakken, P. (1993). Miljøbevissthet og forbruksendring. Working report 9/93. Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  58. Stø, E. (1979). Forbrukerorganisering. Organisasjonenes representasjon og deltakelse i norsk forbrukerpolitikk. Oslo, FMD, forskningsrapport nr. 22.Google Scholar
  59. Stø, E. (1984). Forbrukerinnflytelse og forbrukerorganisering. In: S. Grønmo (Ed.), Forbruker, marked og samfunn. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  60. Stø, E. (1995a) (Ed.), Sustainable consumption. Working report no. 2/95, Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  61. Stø, E. (1995b). Market and State in Nordic Consumer Policy. In: F. Hansen (ed). European Advances in Consumer Research. Volume 2. pp 283–288, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Reseach.Google Scholar
  62. Stø, E. (1997). The Dualism of Consumer Policy in Norway. In: Brobeck, S., Mayer, R.N., and Herrmann, R.O. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of the consumer movement. pp. 414–417. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  63. Stø, E. (2002). Environmental product information schemes (EPIS) in the Nordic countries. In: F. Rubik & G. Scholl (Eds.), Eco-labelling practice in Europe. An overview of environmental product information schemes, pp. 212–225. Heidelberg: IÖW.Google Scholar
  64. Stø, E., Strandbakken, P., and Strand, M.M. (2002). Consumers and environmental information. A survey of consumers' use of and attitudes towards environmental product information in Germany, Italy, Norway and Spain. Lysaker: SIFO-Professional Report No. 3-2002.Google Scholar
  65. Stø, E. & Jensen T.Ø. (1986). Norsk forbrukerpolitikk ved en skilleveg. Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift (3) 91–110.Google Scholar
  66. Stø, E. Strandbakken, P., Throne-Holst, H. & Vittersø, G. (2004). Potentials and limitations of environmental information to individual consumers. Paper presented at the working group Sociology of Consumption, Copenhagen. August 26–28, 2004.Google Scholar
  67. Strandbakken, P. (1995). Bærekraftig Forbruk. Sustainable Consumption. Report no 1, Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  68. Strandbakken, P. (2002). Environmental product information schemes (EPIS) in Norway. In: F. Rubik F. & G. Scholl (Eds.), Eco-labelling practice in Europe. An overview of environmental product information schemes, pp. 226–243. Heidelberg: IÖW,.Google Scholar
  69. Throne-Holst, H. (1999). Forbrukernes rolle i miljøpolitiske suksesser/The role of consumers in environmental successes. Working-report no 1/99. Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  70. Throne-Hoist H. (2000). Blyfri bensin. Forbrukernes rolle i utfasingen av blyholdig bensin/ Unleaded petrol. The role of the consumers in the phasing-out of leaded petrol. Working paper 17/2000. Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  71. Torjusen, H., Nyberg, A. & Wandel, M. (1999). Økologiskprodusert mat: Forbrukernes vurderinger og bruksmonster/ Organic food: Consumers' perceptions and dietary choices. Report nr. 5/99. Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  72. Torjusen, H. (2001). Økologisk mat. Hindringer og muligheter for forbruk av økologisk mat sett fra forbrukernes side. Oppdragsrapport nr. 16. 2001. Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  73. Tufte P.A. & Lavik R. (1997). Health and environmental information. Report no 4/97. Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  74. van Raaij F. (1995). A hierarchy of excuses for not behaving in a pro-environmental way. In: E. Stø (Ed.), Sustainable consumption. Working report no. 2, 1995:209–244, Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  75. Vegdirektoratet (1972). Forslag fra representanten Halfdan Hegtun til Stortinget sendt regjeringen / Comments to a proposition by Halfdan Hegtun, a member of the Norwegian Parliament. Letter to Samferdselsdepartementet (The Norwegian Ministry of Communications). Dated 19.07.1972.Google Scholar
  76. Vittersø, G. (2000). Forbrukernes rolle i lanseringen av økologisk melk. Working paper 5/2000. Lysaker: National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  77. Vittersø, G. (2003). Consumption practices and environmental information in everyday life — Case study of households in Fredrikstad. Oslo: National Institute for Consumer Research. Deliverable no 14 a from the ToolSust project.Google Scholar
  78. World Commssion on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eivind Stø
    • 1
  • Harald Throne-Hoist
    • 1
  • Gunnar Vittersø
    • 1
  1. 1.SIFO — Norwegian Institute of Consumer ResearchNorway

Personalised recommendations