Advertisement

In the Eye of the Beholder: Danish Consumer-Citizens and Sustainability

  • Suzanne C. Beckmann
Chapter

Keywords

Environmental Concern Responsible Behaviour Liberal Democracy Social Dilemma Environmental Attitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, T.W. & Cunningham, W.H. (1972). The socially conscious consumer, Journal of Marketing, 36(3), 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbuthnot, J. (1977). The roles of attitudinal and personality variables in the prediction of environmental behavior and knowledge, Environment and Behavior, 9(2), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns, Journal of Business Research, 17, 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1995). Ecological enlightenment. Essays on the politics of risk society. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beckmann, S.C. (2001). Danske forbrugere og økologiske fødevarer. København: Handelshøjskolens Forlag.Google Scholar
  7. Beckmann, S.C., Christensen, A.S. & Christensen, A.G. (2001). “Myths of nature” and environmentally responsible behaviours: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the 30th European Marketing Academy Conference, Bergen/Norway.Google Scholar
  8. Bohlen, G., Schlegelmilch, B.B. & Diamantopoulos, A. (1993). Measuring ecological concern: A multi-construct perspective (Working paper series No. Working paper EBMS/1993/10): The European Business Management School, University of Wales, Swansea.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, L., Flavin, C. & Postel, S. (1991). Saving the planet. How to shape an environmentally friendly sustainable global economy. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Coddington, W. (1993). Environmental marketing's new relationship with corporate environmental management, Total Quality Environmental Management, 2(3), 297–302.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahlstrand, U. & Biel, A. (1997). Pro-environmental habits: Propensity levels in behavioral change, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 588–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawes, R. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobson, A. (1990). Green political thought. London: Harper Collins Academic.Google Scholar
  14. Douglas, M. (1996). Thought styles. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Dowie, M. (1996). Losing ground. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Drumwright, M.E. (1994). Socially responsible organizational buying: Environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion, Journal of Marketing, 58(July), 1–19.Google Scholar
  17. Dryzek, J.S. (1987). Rational ecology: Environment and political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dryzek, J.S. (1996). Democracy in capitalist times: Ideals, limits, and struggles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dunlap, R.E. (1989). Public opinion and environmental policy. In J.P. Lester (Ed.), Environmental politics and policy, pp. 87–134. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dunlap, R.E. (1991). Public opinion in the 1980's: Clear consensus, ambiguous commitment, Environment, 33, 10–15.Google Scholar
  21. Dunlap, R. & van Liere, K.D. (1978). The ‘New Environmental Paradigm', Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10–19.Google Scholar
  22. Durning, A. (1992). How much is enough? The consumer society and the future of the earth. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Eagley, A.H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.Google Scholar
  24. Eagley, A.H. & Kulesa, P. (1997). Attitudes, attitude structure, and resistance to change: Implications for persuasion on environmental issues. In M.H. Bazerman, D.M. Messik, A.E. Tenbrunsel & K.A. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior. The psychology of environmental valuation and degradation, pp. 122–153. San Francisco, CA: The New Lexington Press.Google Scholar
  25. Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ehrenfeld, D. (1978). The arrogance of humanism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ellen, P.S. Wiener, J.L. & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 102–117.Google Scholar
  28. Fisk, G. (1974). Marketing and the ecological crisis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  29. Garrod, B. & Chadwick, P. (1996). Environmental management and business strategy: Towards a new strategic paradigm, Futures, 28(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goul Andersen, J. (2004). Et ganske levende demokrati. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Grunert, S.C. (1993). Everybody seems concerned about the environment: But is this concern reflected in (Danish) consumers' food choice? In W.F. van Raaij & G.J. Bamossy (Eds.), European advances in consumer research, vol. 1, pp. 428–433. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  32. Grunert, S.C. & Juhl, H. J. (1995). Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods, Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(1), 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grunert, S.C. & Røhme, N. (1992). Consumers' environmental concern: Are we really tapping true concern that relates to environmentally ethic behaviour? In ESOMAR (Ed.), Marketing and research under a “New World Order”, pp. 159–177. Tokyo: ESOMAR, JMA & ARF.Google Scholar
  34. Grunert-Beckmann, S.C. & Kilbourne, W.E. (1997). The dominant social paradigm, value systems, and environmental concern: Examining the human triad's (in)compatibilities. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual MacroMarketing Conference, Bergen.Google Scholar
  35. Grunert-Beckmann, S.C. & Knudsen, T. (1996). Motives for sustainable consumer and company behaviour: Internal versus external attribution of responsibility. In: Social & economic representations. Proceedings of the XXIst Annual Colloquium of the International Association for Economic Psychology, Paris.Google Scholar
  36. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162, 1243–1248.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hirschman, A.O. (1977). The passions and the interests: Political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Jamison, A. & Østby, P. (Eds.) (1997). Public participation and sustainable development. Comparing European experiences. Pesto papers 1. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Jennings, D.P. & Zandbergen, P.A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable corporations: An institutional approach, Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kassarjian, H.H. (1971). Incorporating ecology into marketing strategy: The case of air pollution, Journal of Marketing, 35, 61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keller, R. & Poferl, A. (1998). Vergesellschaftete Natur — Öffentliche Diskurse und soziale Strukturierung. In: K.-W. Brand (Ed.), Soziologie und Natur, pp. 117–142. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.Google Scholar
  42. Kilbourne, W.E. (1995). Green advertising: Salvation or oxymoron? Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 7–19.Google Scholar
  43. Kilbourne, W.E. & Beckmann, S.C. (1998). Review and critical assessment of research on marketing and the environment, Journal of Marketing Management, 14(6), 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kilbourne, W.E., Beckmann, S.C., Lewis, A. & van Dam, Y. (2001). A multinational examination of the role of the Dominant Social Paradigm in environmental attitudes of university students, Environment & Behavior, 33(2), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kilbourne, W.E., Beckmann, S.C. & Thelen, E. (2002). The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: A multi-national examination, Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kilbourne, W.E., McDonagh, P. & Prothero, A. (1997). Sustainable consumption and the quality of life: A macromarketing challenge to the dominant social paradigm, Journal of Macromarketing, 17(1), 4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kinnear, T.C., Taylor, J.R. & Ahmed, S.A. (1974). Ecologically concerned consumers: Who are they? Journal of Marketing, 38, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krause, D. (1993). Environmental consciousness: An empirical study, Environment and Behavior, 25(January), 126–142.Google Scholar
  49. MacPherson, C.B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  50. McCarty, J.A. & Shrum, L.J. (1994). The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior, Journal of Business Research, 30, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature. Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  52. Milbrath, L. (1984). Environmentalists: Vanguardsfor a new society. Albany, NY: University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ophuls, W. (1977). Ecology and the politics of scarcity: A prologue to a political theory of the steady state. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
  54. O'Riordan, T. (1976). Environmentalism. London: Pion Unlimited.Google Scholar
  55. Ottman, J.A. (1993). Green marketing. Challenges & opportunities for the new marketing age. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.Google Scholar
  56. Palmborg, C. (1987). Social habits and energy consumption in single-family homes, Energy, 11, 643–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Palmer, K., Oates, W.E. & Portney, P.R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.Google Scholar
  58. Pickett, G.M., Kangun, N. & Grove, S.J. (1993). Is there a general conserving consumer? A public policy concern, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12(2), 234–243.Google Scholar
  59. Pieters, R., Bijmolt, T., van Raaij, F. & de Kruijk, M. (1998). Consumer's attributions of proenvironmental behavior, motivation, and ability to self and others, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 215–225.Google Scholar
  60. Pilling, B.K., Crosby, L.A. & Ellen, P.S. (1991). Using benefit segmentation to influence environmental legislation: A bottle bill application, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 28–46.Google Scholar
  61. Porter, M.E. (1991). America's green strategy. Scientific American, 263(April), 168.Google Scholar
  62. Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  63. Purser, R.E., Park, C. & Montuori, A. (1995). Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm? Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1053–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roberts, J.A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990's: Profile and implications for advertising, Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sagoff, M. (1988). The economy of earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Samdahl, D.M. & Robertson, R. (1989). Social determinants of environmental concern. Specification and test of the model, Environment and Behavior, 21(1), 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scherhorn, G. (1993). Consumers' concern about the environment and its impact on business, Journal of Consumer Policy, 16, 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schwarz, M. & Thompson, M. (1990). Divided we stand. Redefining politics, technology and social choice. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  69. Schwepker, C.H. & Cornwell, T.B. (1991). An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 77–101.Google Scholar
  70. Scott, D. & Willits, F.K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior. A Pennsylvania survey. Environment and Behavior, 26(2), 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317–344.Google Scholar
  72. Shrivastava, P. (1995a). Ecocentric management for a risk society, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 118–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shrivastava, P. (1995b). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability, Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936–960.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Singhapakdi, A. & LaTour, M.S. (1991). The link between social responsibility orientation, motive appeals and voting intentions: A case of an anti-littering campaign, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 118–129.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, A. (1976). The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Stern, P.C. Dietz, T. & Guagnano, G.A (1995). The New Ecological Paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27(6), 723–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thompson, S. C.G. & Barton, M.A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes towards the environment, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thompson, M., Ellis, R. & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  79. Thurow, L.C. (1980). The zero-sum society: Distribution and the possibilities for economic change. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
  80. Van Dam, Y.K. & Apeldoorn, P.A.C. (1996). Sustainable marketing, Journal of Macromarketing, 16(2), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. van Raaij, W.F. (1995). A hierarchy of excuses for not behaving in a pro-environmental way. In E. Sto (Ed.), Sustainable consumption, Working Report No. 2, pp. 209–243. Oslo: SIFO.Google Scholar
  82. Walley, N. & Whitehead, B. (1994). It's not easy being green, Harvard Business Review (May–June), 46–52.Google Scholar
  83. Wiener, J.L. & Doescher, T.A. (1991). A framework for promoting cooperation, Journal of Marketing, 55(April), 38–47.Google Scholar
  84. Wong, V., Turner, W. & Stoneman, P. (1996). Marketing strategies and market prospects for environmentally-friendly consumer products, British Journal of Management, 7, 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zimmer, M.R., Stafford, T.F. & Stafford, M.R. (1994). Green issues: Dimensions of environmental concern, Journal of Business Research, 30, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suzanne C. Beckmann
    • 1
  1. 1.CBS — Department of Intercultural Communication and ManagementDenmark

Personalised recommendations