Peripheral Cues in Advertising and Consumer Policy
Do physically attractive models in advertising still have an effect?
- 604 Downloads
KeywordsMobile Phone Classical Conditioning Purchase Intention Consumer Research Female Model
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alba, J.W. & Hutchinson, J.W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, (March), 411–454.Google Scholar
- Bower, A.B. (2001). Highly attractive models in advertising and the women who loathe them: The implications of negative affect for spokesperson effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 51–63.Google Scholar
- Caballero, M.J., Lumpkin, J.R. & Madden, S.C. (1989). Using physical attractiveness as an advertising tool: An empirical test of the attraction phenomenon, Journal of Advertising Research, 29, 16–22.Google Scholar
- Caballero, M.J. & Solomon, P.J. (1984). Effects of model attractiveness on sales response, Journal of Advertising, 13, 17–23.Google Scholar
- MacKenzie, S.B. & Lutz, R.J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context, Journal of Marketing, 53 (April), 48–65.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, A.A. & Olson, J.C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attributes? Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 245–262.Google Scholar
- Mölleryd, B. (1999). Entrepreneurship in technological systems — The development of mobile telephony in Sweden. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stockholm: The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Petroshius, S.M. & Crocker, K.E. (1989). An empirical analysis of spokesperson characteristics on advertisement and product evaluation, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17, 217–225.Google Scholar
- Peterson, R.A. & Wilson, W.R. (1992). Measuring customer satisfaction: Fact and artifact, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 61–71.Google Scholar
- Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
- Priluck Grossman, R. & Till, B.D. (1998). The persistence of classically conditioned brand attitudes, Journal of Advertising, 28, 23–31.Google Scholar
- Rossiter, J. & Percy, L. (1997). Advertising communications & promotions management. New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
- Smith, G. & Engel, R. (1968). Influence of a female model on perceived characteristics of an automobile, Proceedings of the 76th Annual convention of the American Psychological Association, 681–682.Google Scholar
- Till, B.D. & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intention and brand beliefs, Journal of Advertising, 29, 1–13.Google Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005