Skip to main content

Conditions for the Validity of F-Ratio Tests for Treatment and Carryover Effects in Crossover Designs

  • Chapter
Statistical Modeling and Analysis for Complex Data Problems

Abstract

Continuous data from crossover trials are often analysed using ordinary least squares with the assumption of independent errors. Because each experimental unit receives a sequence of treatment and repeated measurements are collected, it is more realistic to assume that the errors within an experimental unit are correlated. In this paper, we extend to crossover designs the conditions on the covariance structure of the errors, found by Huynh and Feldt (1970) for randomized block and split-plot designs, that will not invalidate the F-ratio tests for treatment and carryover effects. We also show that results on optimal crossover designs remain valid under this more general structure of the covariance matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, T.W. (1984). An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Second Edition, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellavance, F., Tardif, S., and Stephens, M.A. (1996). Tests for the analysis of variance of crossover designs with correlated errors. Biometrics, 52:607–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, M. and Mukherjee, B. (2003). Optimal crossover designs under a general model. Statistics & Probability Letters, 62:413–418.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Zhao, P.-L., and Zhang, J. (2002). A note on ANOVA assumptions and robust analysis for a cross-over study. Statistics in Medicine, 21:1377–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C.S. and Wu, C.F. (1980). Balanced repeated measurements designs. The Annals of Statistics, 8:1272–1283. Corrigendum, 11:349, 1983.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goad, C.L. and Johnson, D.E. (2000). Crossover experiments: A comparison of ANOVA tests and alternative analyses. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 5:69–87.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A. and Afsarinejad, K. (1978). Repeated measures designs II. The Annals of Statistics, 6:619–628.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H. and Feldt, L.S. (1970). Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65:1582–1589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. and Kenward, M.G. (1989). Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. and Wang, J. (2000). The analysis of repeated measurements in sensory and consumer studies. Food Quality and Preference, 11:35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, J. (1975). Construction and optimality of generalised Youden designs. In: Srivastava, J.N. (ed.), A Survey of Statistical Design and Linear Models, pp. 333–353, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlarski, I. (1964). On bivariate random variables where the quotient of their coordinates follows some known distribution. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35:1673–1684.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kunert, J. (1984). Optimality of balanced uniform repeated measurements designs. The Annals of Statistics, 12:1006–1017.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kunert, J. (1985). Optimal repeated measurements designs for correlated observations and analysis by least squares. Biometrika, 72:375–389.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kunert, J. (1987). On variance estimation in cross-over designs. Biometrics, 43:833–845.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kushner, H.B. (1997). Optimal repeated measurements designs: the linear optimality equations. The Annals of Statistics, 25:2328–2344.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kushner, H.B. (1998). Optimal and efficient repeated-measurements designs for uncorrelated observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93:1176–1187.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J.N.S. (1987). Optimal crossover designs for the comparison of two treatments in the presence of carryover effects and autocorrelated errors. Biometrika, 74:311–320.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J.N.S. (1989). Estimating dispersion parameters in the analysis of data from crossover trials. Biometrika, 76:239–244.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J.N.S. (1990). The analysis of data from crossover designs: The efficiency of Ordinary Least Squares. Biometrics, 46:689–696.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Monga and Tardif, S. (1992). Validity of the F-ratio test for replicated latin square designs under relaxed conditions. Biometrical Journal, 34:701–709.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, S.R. (1987). Linear Models for Unbalanced Data. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfling, R.J. (1980). Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bellavance, F., Tardif, S. (2005). Conditions for the Validity of F-Ratio Tests for Treatment and Carryover Effects in Crossover Designs. In: Duchesne, P., RÉMillard, B. (eds) Statistical Modeling and Analysis for Complex Data Problems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24555-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics