Exploring Probability in School pp 145-169 | Cite as

# The Probabilistic Reasoning of Middle School Students

Chapter

## Keywords

Middle School Probabilistic Reasoning Middle School Student Annual Conference Mathematic Education Research
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Amir, G. S., & Williams, J. S. (1999). Cultural influences on children's probabilistic thinking.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior*,*18*(1), 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Batanero, C., Serrano, L., & Garfield, J. B. (1996). Heuristics and biases in secondary school students' reasoning about probability. In L. Puig and A. Gutierrez (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 20*^{th}*annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 2, pp. 51–58). Valencia, Spain: University of Valencia.Google Scholar - Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982).
*Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy*. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar - Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1991). Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behaviour. In H.A.H. Rowe (Ed.),
*Intelligence: Reconceptualization and measurement*(pp. 57–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Borovcnik, M., & Bentz, H. J. (1991). Empirical research in understanding probability. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.),
*Chance encounters: Probability in education*(pp. 73–105), Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar - Cañizares M. J., & Batanero, C. (1998, June).
*A study on the stability of equiprobability bias in 10–14 year-old children*. Poster paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Singapore.Google Scholar - Davidson, D. (1995). The representativeness heuristic and the conjunction fallacy effect in children's decision making.
*Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41*, 328–346.Google Scholar - Dessart, D. J. (1995). Randomness: A connection to reality. In P. A. House (Ed.),
*Connecting mathematics across the curriculum: 1995 Yearbook*(pp. 177–181). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Fischbein, E., & Gazit, A. (1984). Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions? An exploratory research study.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15*, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fischbein, E., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1991). Factors affecting probability judgements in children and adolescents.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22*, 523–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28*, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.
*Psychological Review, 102*, 684–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Green, D. R. (1983). A survey of probability concepts in 3000 pupils aged 11–16 years. In D. R. Grey, P. Holmes, V. Barnett, & G. M. Constable (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the First International Conference on Teaching Statistics*(Vol. 2, pp. 766–783). Sheffield, UK: Teaching Statistics Trust.Google Scholar - Green, D. R. (1984). Talking of probability…
*Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications*,*20*(9/10), 145–149.Google Scholar - Green, D. R. (1988). Children's understanding of randomness: Report of a survey of 1600 children aged 7–11 years. In R. Davidson & J. Swift (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics*(pp. 287–291). Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.Google Scholar - Green, D. R. (1991). A longitudinal study of pupils' probability concepts. In D. Vere-Jones (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Teaching Statistics*(Vol. 1, pp. 320–328). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar - Kelly, B. A., & Watson, J.M. (2002). Variation in a chance sampling setting: The lollies task. In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. O. J. Thomas (Eds.),
*Mathematics education in the South Pacific*(Proceedings of the 26^{th}annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, pp. 366–373). Sydney, NSW: MERGA.Google Scholar - Konold, C., & Garfield, J. (1992).
*Statistical reasoning assessment: Part 1. Intuitive thinking*. Amherst, MA: Scientific Reasoning Research Institute, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar - Konold, C., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., Lohmeier, J., & Lipson, A. (1993). Inconsistencies in students' reasoning about probability.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24*, 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lecoutre, M-P. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in “purely random” situations.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23*, 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Li, J., & Pereira-Mendoza, L. (2002). Misconceptions in probability. In B. Phillips (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Cape Town, South Africa*. [CD-ROM] Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar - Moritz, J. B. (1998). Long odds: Longitudinal development of student understanding of odds. In C. Kanes, M. Goos, & E. Warren (Eds.),
*Teaching mathematics in new times*, (Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, (pp. 373–380). Gold Coast: MERGA.Google Scholar - Moritz, J. B., & Watson, J. M. (2000). Reasoning and expressing probability in students' judgements of coin tossing. In J. Bana & A. Chapman (Eds.),
*Mathematics education beyond 2000*(Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, pp. 448–455). Perth, WA: MERGA.Google Scholar - Moritz, J. B., Watson, J. M., & Collis, K. F. (1996). Odds: Chance measurement in three contexts. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.),
*Technology in mathematics education*(Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 390–397). Melbourne, VIC: MERGA.Google Scholar - Moritz, J. B., Watson, J. M., & Pereira-Mendoza, L. (1996, November).
*The language of statistical understanding: An investigation in two countries*. A paper presented at the Joint ERA/AARE Conference, Singapore.Google Scholar - Pratt, D. (2000). Making sense of the total of two dice.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31*, 602–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Reading, C., & Shaughnessy, M. (2000). Student perceptions of variation in a sampling situation. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the*24^{th}*annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 4, pp. 89–96). Hiroshima, Japan: Hiroshima University.Google Scholar - Schwartz, D. L., & Goldman, S. R. (1996). Why people are not like marbles in an urn: An effect of context on statistical reasoning.
*Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10*, S99–S112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.),
*Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 465–494). New York: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and MacMillan.Google Scholar - Shaughnessy, J. M., Canada, D., & Ciancetta, M. (2003). Middle school students' thinking about variability in repeated trials: A cross-task comparison. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 27*^{th}*annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 25th conference of PME-NA*(Vol. 4, pp. 159–165). Honolulu, HI: Center for Research and Development Group, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar - Shaughnessy, J. M., & Ciancetta, M. (2002). Students' understanding of variability in a probability environment. In B. Phillips (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Cape Town, South Africa*. [CD-ROM] Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar - Shaughnessy, J. M., Ciancetta, M., & Canada, D. (2004). Types of student reasoning on sampling tasks. In M. Johnsen-HØines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 28*^{th}*annual conference of the International Study Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 4, pp. 177–184). Bergen, Norway: PME.Google Scholar - Shaughnessy, J. M., Watson, J., Moritz, J., & Reading, C. (1999, April). School mathematics students' acknowledgment of statistical variation. In C. Maher (Chair),
*There's more to life than centers*. Presession Research Symposium, 77th Annual National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Conference, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar - Tarr, J. E. (2002). Confounding effects of the phrase “50–50 chance” in making conditional probability judgments.
*Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics*,*24*(4), 35–53.Google Scholar - Tarr, J. E., & Jones, G. A. (1997). A framework for assessing middle school students' thinking in conditional probability and independence.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9*, 39–59.Google Scholar - Torok, R., & Watson, J. (2000). Development of the concept of statistical variation: An exploratory study.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12*, 147–169.Google Scholar - Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1980). Causal schemas in judgements under uncertainty. In M. Fishbein (Ed.),
*Progress in social psychology*(Vol. 1, pp. 49–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgement.
*Psychological Review, 90*, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Vidakovic, D., Berenson, S., and Brandsma, J. (1998). Children's intuitions of probabilistic concepts emerging from fair play. In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. S. Kea, T. W. Kee, & W. Wong (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics*(Vol. 1, pp. 67–73). Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar - Watson, J. M. (1998). The role of statistical literacy in decisions about risk: Where to start.
*For the Learning of Mathematics*,*18*(3), 25–27.Google Scholar - Watson, J. M., Collis, K. F., & Moritz, J. B. (1995). Children's understanding of luck. In B. Atweh & S. Flavel (Eds.),
*Galtha*(Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 550–556). Darwin, NT: MERGA.Google Scholar - Watson, J. M., Collis, K. F., & Moritz, J. B. (1997). The development of chance measurement.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9*, 60–82.Google Scholar - Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2002). Variation as part of chance and data in grades 7 and 9. In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. O. J. Thomas (Eds.),
*Mathematics education in the South Pacific*(Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, pp. 682–289). Sydney, NSW: MERGA. (Includes chance subscale.)Google Scholar - Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2003). Predicting dice outcomes: The dilemma of expectation versus variation. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert, & J. Mousley (Eds.),
*Mathematics education research: Innovation, networking, opportunity*(Proceedings of the 26^{th}annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Geelong, pp. 728–735). Sydney, NSW: MERGA.Google Scholar - Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2004). Expectation versus variation: Students' decision making in a chance environment.
*Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4*, 371–396.Google Scholar - Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (in press). Statistical variation in a chance setting: A two-year study.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*.Google Scholar - Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (1998). Longitudinal development of chance measurement.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal*,*10*(2), 103–127.Google Scholar - Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2001). The role of cognitive conflict in developing students' understanding of chance measurement. In J. Bobis, B. Perry, & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.),
*Numeracy and beyond*(Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, pp. 523–530). Sydney, NSW: MERGA.Google Scholar - Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2002). School students' reasoning about conjunction and conditional events.
*International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 33*, 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2003a). The development of comprehension of chance language: evaluation and interpretation.
*School Science and Mathematics, 103*, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2003b). Fairness of dice: A longitudinal study of students' beliefs and strategies for making judgments.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34*, 270–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005