Advertisement

Probability in Teacher Education and Development

  • Hollylynne Stohl
Part of the Mathematics Education Library book series (MELI, volume 40)

Keywords

Professional Development Teacher Education Preservice Teacher Content Knowledge Theoretical Probability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 241–247.Google Scholar
  2. Begg, A., & Edwards, R. (1999, December). Teachers' ideas about teaching statistics. Paper presented at the combined annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education and the New Zealand Association for Research in Education. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Zvi, D. (2000). Toward understanding the role of technological tools in statistical learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 2(1&2), 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biehler, R. (1991). Computers in probability education. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education, (pp.169–211). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Carnell, L. J. (1997). Characteristics of reasoning about conditional probability (preservice teachers). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina-Greensboro.Google Scholar
  6. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2001). The mathematical education of teachers. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  8. Dugdale, S. (2001). Pre-service teachers' use of computer simulation to explore probability. Computers in the Schools 17(1/2), 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Even, R. (1990). Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 521–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falk, R. (1988). Conditional probabilities: Insights and difficulties. In R. Davidson & J. Swift (Eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics (pp. 292–297). Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria.Google Scholar
  11. Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friel, S. N., & Joyner, J. (1997). Teach-Statfor teachers: Professional development manual. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publication.Google Scholar
  13. Friel, S. N., & Bright, G. W. (1998) Teach-Stat: A model for professional development in data analysis and statistics for teachers K-6. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching, and assessment in Grades K-12 (pp. 89–117). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Gattuso, L., & Pannone, M. A. (2002). Teacher's training in a statistics teaching experiment. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Teaching of Statistics (On CD). Hawthorn, VIC: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Haller, S. K. (1997). Adopting probability curricula: The content and pedagogical content knowledge of middle grades teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  16. Heinz, K., Kinzel, M., Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2000). Moving students through steps of mathematical knowing: An account of the practice of an elementary mathematics teacher in transition. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19(1), 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Konold, C., Polletsek, A., Well, A., Lohmeier, J., & Lipson, A. (1993). Inconsistencies in students' reasoning about probability. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(5), 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kvatinsky, T., & Even, R. (2002). Framework for teacher knowledge and understanding of probability. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Teaching of Statistics (On CD). Hawthorn, VIC: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Lopes, C. A. E., & de Moura, L. A. R. (2002). Probability and statistics in elementary school: A research of teachers' training. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Teaching of Statistics (On CD). Hawthorn, VIC: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  20. McClain, K. (2002a). Supporting teachers' understanding of statistical data analysis: Learning trajectories as tools for change. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Teaching of Statistics (On CD). Hawthorn, VIC: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  21. McClain, K. (2002b). Learning trajectories as tools for supporting teacher change: A case from statistical data analysis. In, D. Mewborn (Ed.), Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 1545–1555). Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  24. Nicholson, J. R., & Darnton, C. (2003). Mathematics teachers teaching statistics: What are the challenges for the classroom teacher? In Proceedings of the 54 th Session of the International Statistical Institute. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Pereira-Mendoza, L. (2002). Would you allow your accountant to perform surgery? Implications for the education of primary teachers. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Teaching of Statistics (On CD). Hawthorn, VIC: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  26. Sanchez, E. S. (2002). Teachers' beliefs about usefulness of simulations with the educational software Fathom for developing probability concepts in statistics classroom. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Teaching of Statistics (On CD). Hawthorn, VIC: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Schaeffer, R. L., Watkins, A. E, & Landwehr, J. M. (1998) What every high-school graduate should know about statistics. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching, and assessment in Grades K-12 (pp. 3–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Shaughnessy, J. M. (1977). Misconceptions of probability: An experiment with a small-group, activity-based, model building approach to introductory probability at the college level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8, 285–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In Grouws, D.A. (Ed.). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steinbring, H. (1991a). The theoretical nature of probability in the classroom. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 135–167). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Steinbring, H. (1991b). The concept of chance in everyday teaching: Aspects of a social epistemology of mathematical knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics 22(6), 503–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stohl, H. (1999–2002). Probability Explorer. Software application available at http://www.probexplorer.com. Published by Author.Google Scholar
  34. Stohl, H. (2004). Middle school teachers' development of stochastic understanding as it applies to pedagogical understanding when using simulations. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  35. Stohl, H. & Rider, R. (2003). Are these die fair: An analysis of students' technology-based exploration. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27 th annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 325). Honolulu: Center for Research and Development Group, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R. A., Thompson, P. W., & Boyd, B. A. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In A. Coxford (Ed.) Professional development for teachers of mathematics: 1994 Yearbook (pp. 79–92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  38. Vacc, N. N. (1995). Supervisor and teacher educator perceived relevance of recommendations in the NCTM curriculum standards. School Science and Mathematics 95(6), 310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Voigt, J. (1996). Negotiation of mathematical meaning in classroom processes: Social interaction and learning mathematics. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 21–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  40. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  41. Watson, J. M. (1997). Chance and data for luddites. Australian Mathematics Teacher 53(3), 24–29.Google Scholar
  42. Watson, J. M. (2001). Profiling teachers' competence and confidence to teach particular mathematics topics: The case of chance and data. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 4(4), 305–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yarbrough, S. J., Daane, C. J., & Vessel, A. M. (1998, November). An investigation of ten elementary teachers' quantitative literacy instruction as a result of participation in the Alabama Quantitative Literacy Workshop. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hollylynne Stohl

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations