Skip to main content
Book cover

Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research pp 195–221Cite as

Entrepreneurial Behavior and Firm Organizing Processes

  • Chapter

Part of the International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship book series (IHSE,volume 1)

Keywords

  • Entrepreneurial Activity
  • Nascent Entrepreneur
  • Entrepreneurial Behavior
  • Entrepreneurship Research
  • Business Venture

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/0-387-24519-7_9
  • Chapter length: 27 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-0-387-24519-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldrich, H.E. (1999). Organizations Evolving. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H.E. and M. Fiol (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H., A. Kalleberg, P. Marsden and J. Cassell (1989). In pursuit of evidence: Sampling procedures for locating new businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(6), 367–386.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K.R. and T.M. Stearns (2002). Nascent high tech entrepreneurs: Who are they and how they compare with no-technology entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the Babson College Kauffman Foundation Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Boulder, CO, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., L. Glosten and E. Muller (1993). Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management Studies, 30(5), 815–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. (1993). Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 197–210.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S.W. and G. Gordon (1966). An entrepreneurial theory of formal organizations. Part I: Patterns of formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, XX, Vol. 11, 315–344.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B.A. (1989). Entrepreneurial Behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S. (1984). Finding the new firm. Academy of Management Proceedings, 47, 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S. (1986). The role of new firms: Births, deaths, and job generation. Strategic Management Journal, 7(4), 361–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, I. and G.E. Willard (1993). Towards a theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 183–195.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L.W. (1996). Research on entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of'Small Business Management, 34(4), 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L.W. and G.B. Murphy (1996). New evidence in the pursuit of locating new businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 221–231.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G.R. and M.T. Hannan (2000). The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N.M. (1997). Entrepreneurial processes and outcomes: The influence of gender. In P.D. Reynolds and S.B. White (eds.), The Entrepreneurial Process. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, pp. 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N.M. (2002). The role of risk orientation on financing expectations in new venture creation: Does sex matter? Paper presented at the Babson College Kauffman Foundation Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Boulder, CO, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N.M., W.B. Gartner and P.D. Reynolds (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 151–166.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N.M., W.B. Gartner and P.G. Greene (2002). Already there? The career reasons of minority nascent entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meetings. Denver, CO, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N.M., W.B. Gartner, K.G. Shaver and E.J. Gatewood (in press). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. and A.H. van de Ven (1996). Learning the innovation journey: Order out of chaos? Organization Science, 7(6), 593–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crookall, D. (1994). Editorial: Entrepreneurship education. Simulation and Gaming, 25(3), 333–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosa, B., H.E. Aldrich and L. Keister (2002). Is there a wealth affect? Financial and human capital as determinants of business startups. Paper presented at the Babson College Kauffman Foundation Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Boulder, CO, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R.L. and K.L. Weick (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2) 284–295.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F. and S. Shane (2002). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Working Paper. College Park, MD: R.H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, W.J. (1997). More than you think: An inclusive estimate of business entries. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 175–196.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, K. (1997). A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 1, 69–97.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J.E. (1993a). Interpretations on automatic: A different view of strategic issue diagnosis. Journal of Management Studies, 30(3), 339–357.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J.E. (1993b). The making of organizational opportunities: An interpretive pathway to organizational change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 195–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J.E. and S.E. Jackson (1988). Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 76–90.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis C. and A.P. Bochner (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 733–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice (1992) 17(1).

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  • Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice (1993) 17(2).

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, T. (2001). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research: A few comments and some suggested extensions. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaglio, C.M. and J.A. Katz (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2), 95–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10, 696–706.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. (1988). Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11–32.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. (1989). Some suggestions for research on entrepreneurial traits and characteristics. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(1), 27–38.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 15–28.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. (1993a). Organizing the voluntary association. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 103–106.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. (1993b). Words lead to deeds: Towards an organizational emergence vocabulary. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 231–240.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. (2001). Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 27–39.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B., B.J. Bird, and J. Starr (1992). Acting as if: Differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 16(3), 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B., N.M. Carter and G.E. Hills (in press). The language of opportunity. In C. Steyaert and D. Hjorth (eds.), New Movements in Entrepreneurship. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. and E.J. Gatewood (1993). And now for something completely different. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartncr, W.B., T.R. Mitchell and K.H. Vesper (1989). A taxonomy of new business ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(3), 169–186.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. and S.A. Shane (1995). Measuring entrepreneurship over time. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 283–301.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. and K.G. Shaver (2002). The attributional characteristics of opportunities and problems described by nascent entrepreneurs in the PSED. Paper presented at the Babson College Kauffman Foundation Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Boulder, CO, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B., K.G. Shaver, N.M. Carter and P.D. Reynolds (in press). The Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Organization Creation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.B. and J. Starr (1993). The nature of entrepreneurial work. In S. Birley and I.C. MacMillan (eds.), Entrepreneurship Research: Global Perspectives. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R. and A.H. vn de Ven (1992). An empirical evaluation of the internal corporate venturing process. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatewood, E.J., K.G. Shaver and W.B. Gartner (1995). A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviors and success at venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(5), 371–391.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. (1988). Time and transition in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 9–41.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. (1994). Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal, 4, 9–45.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M.R. (1997). Identity, space and politics: A critique of the poverty debates. In J.P. Jones III, H.J. Nast, and S.M. Roberts (eds.), Thresholds in Feminist Geography: Difference, Methodology, Representation. Oxford, U.K.: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D.A., M. Schultz and K.G. Corley (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63–81.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, P.G., N.M. Carter and P.D. Reynolds (in press). Minority entrepreneurship: Trends and explanations. In C. Steyaert and D. Hjorth (eds.), New Movements in Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. and J. Freeman (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 45, 149–164.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, R.F. and A.N. Link (1988). The Entrepreneur. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R.C. and M. Levenhagen (1995). Metaphors and mental models: Sensemaking and sensegiving in innovative and entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1057–1074.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, G. and R. Shrader (1998). Successful entrepreneur's insights into opportunity recognition. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College, pp. 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S.E. and J.E. Dutton (1988). Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 370–387.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaish, S. and B. Gilad (1991). Characteristics of opportunity searches of entrepreneurs versus executives: Sources, interests, general alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1), 45–61.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A.L., P.V. Marsden, H.E. Aldrich and J.W. Cassell (1990). Comparing organizational sampling frames. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 658–688.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.A. (1993). The dynamics of organizational emergence: A contemporary group formation perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(2), 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.A. and W.B. Gartner (1988). Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 429–441.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. and R. McTaggart (2000). Participatory action research. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 567–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, B.A. (1994). Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process. An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1968). Entrepreneurship and development. American Economic Review, 58(2): 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, R. (1989). Understanding organization transformation using a dissipative structure mode. Human Relations, 42, 899–916.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, B. (1999). A dynamic model of non-linearity in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 24–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, B. (2000). Emergence as a process of self-organizing: New assumptions and insights from the study of nonlinear dynamic systems. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13, 526–544.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G.T. and G.G. Dess (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135–172.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. (1999). Complexity theory in organization science: Seizing the promise or becoming a fad? Emergence, 1(1), 5–31.

    MathSciNet  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, C.H. and S.E. Human (2000). The Little Engine that Could: Uncertainty and growth expectation of nascent entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 2000. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and B. Rowan (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1996). Images of Organization, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G.B. (2002). The effects of organizational sampling frame selection. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 237–252.

    MathSciNet  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. New York: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J.E. (1982). Organizations and Organization Theory. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M.S., A.H. van de Ven, K. Dooley and M.E. Homes (2000). Organizational Change and Innovation Processes: Theory and Methods for Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P.D. (1992). Predicting new firm births: Interactions of organizational and human populations. In D.L. Sexton and J.D. Kasarda (eds.), The State of the Art of Entrepreneurship. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent, pp. 268–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P.D. (2000). National panel study of U.S. business startups: Background and methodology. In J.A. Katz(ed.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth (Vol. 4). Stamford, CT: JAI Press, pp. 153–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P.D., M. Hay, W.D. Bygrave, S.M. Camp and E. Autio (2000). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2000 Executive Report. Kansas City: Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P.D. and B. Miller (1992). New firm gestation: Conception, birth, and implications for research. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5), 405–418.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P.D. and S.B. White (1997). The Entrepreneurial Process. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, J. (1982). Entrepreneurship. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M., H.E. Aldrich and N.M. Carter (2002). Don't go to strangers: Homophily, strong ties and isolation in the formation of organizational founding teams. Chicago: American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Towards a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonoven, C.B. and E. Romanelli (2001). The Entrepreneurship Dynamic. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R.W. (1997). Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems, 4th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S.G. and V.R. Lane (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. and S. Venkataraman (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K.G., N.M. Carter, W.B. Gartner and P.D. Reynolds (2001). Who is a nascent entrepreneur? Decision rules for identifying and selecting entrepreneurs in the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics. Paper presented at the Babson College Kauffman Foundation Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Jönköping, Sweden, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K.G. and L.R. Scott (1991). Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2000). Analyzing talk and text. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 821–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R.P. (2001). A comment on developing the field of entrepreneurship through the study of opportunity recognition and exploitation. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R.P., G.E. Hills and G.T. Lumpkin (1999). New venture ideas and entrepreneurial opportunities: Understanding the process of opportunity recognition. Proceedings, United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship National Meeting, San Diego, pp. 657–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R.E. (2000). Case studies. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 435–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, T.M. and K.R. Allen (2001). The Foundations of High Technology Start-ups: The who, where, when and why. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 2000. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D.J. (1994). Understanding the Small Business Sector. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. March. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedlock, B. (2000). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 455–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.B., S.M. Clark and D.A. Gioia (1993). Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 239–270.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H., H.L. Angle and M.S. Poole (1989). Research on the Management of Innovation. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H. and D. Polley (1992). Learning while innovating. Organization Science, 3(1), 92–116.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H. and N.S. Poole (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20, 510–540.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H., S. Venkataraman, D. Pooley and R. Garud (1989). Processes of new business creation in different organizational settings. In A.H. van de Ven, H. Angel and M.S. Poole (eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 221–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S. and A.H. van de Ven (1989). Qnetics new business creation case. In A.H. van de Ven, H. Angel and M.S. Poole (eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 228–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, K.H. (1990). New Venture Strategies, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edition. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, B. (1985). On the Importance of Being Nonlinear. Berlin: Spinger-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. and G.G. Dess (2001). Entrepreneurship as a field of research: Encouraging dialogue and debate. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern California, California

    William B. Gartner

  2. University of St. Thomas, St. Thomas

    Nancy M. Carter

Authors
  1. William B. Gartner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nancy M. Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Baltimore, Baltimore

    Zoltan J. Acs

  2. Indiana University, Indiana

    David B. Audretsch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gartner, W.B., Carter, N.M. (2003). Entrepreneurial Behavior and Firm Organizing Processes. In: Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24519-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24519-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24080-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-24519-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive