Skip to main content
Book cover

Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research pp 55–79Cite as

Innovation and Technological Change

  • Chapter

Part of the International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship book series (IHSE,volume 1)

Keywords

  • Technological Change
  • Firm Size
  • Small Firm
  • Large Firm
  • Market Structure

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/0-387-24519-7_4
  • Chapter length: 25 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-0-387-24519-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. (1984). The Changing Structure of the U.S. Economy: Lessons from the Steel Industry. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. (ed.) (1995). Small Firms and Economic Development. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and Catherine Armington (1999). Job flow dynamics in the service sector. Discussion Paper 99-14, Center for Economic Studies, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1988a). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4), September, 678–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1988b). R&D and small firms. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Monopolies and Commercial Law, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, February 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1989). Patents as a measure of innovative activity. Kyklos, 42(2), 171–180.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1990). Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (eds.) (1991). Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (eds.) (1993). Small Firms and Entrepreneurship: An East-West Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1987). Innovation, market structure and firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 567–575.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J., Catherine Armington and Alicia Robb (1999). Gross Job Flows in the U.S. Economy. Discussion Paper 99-01, Center for Economic Studies, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J., David B. Audretsch (1987). Innovation, market structure and firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 567–575.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J., David B. Audretsch and Maryann P. Feldman (1992). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 82(1), 363–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J., David B. Audretsch and Maryann P. Feldman (1994). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(2), 336–367.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P. and B. Kogut (1997). The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 21–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., A. Varga and Zoltan J. Acs (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 422–448.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., A. Varga and Zoltan J. Acs (2000). Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science, 79(4), 435–443.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in R.R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, pp. 609–626. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, Spyros (1997). The impact of firm size on innovative activity — an empirical analysis based on Swiss firm data. Small Business Economics, 9(6), 473–490.

    MathSciNet  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. (1995). Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Maryann P. Feldman (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), June, 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Paula E. Stephan (1996). Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. American Economic Review, 86(3), June, 641–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, John R. (1995). The Dynamics of Industrial Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, William L. and John T. Scott (1987). Market Structure and Technological Change. London and New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beise, Marian and Georg Licht (1996). Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft. Unpublished manuscript, Zentrum für Europaeische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Georg and Eric Nerlinger (1997). Regionale Verteilung von Unternehmensgruendungen in der Informationstechnik: Empirische Ergebnisse fuer Westdeutschland. In Dietmar Harhoff (ed.), Unternehmensgruendungen: Empirische Analysen fuer die alten und neuen Bundeslaender. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 151–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D.L. (1981). Who Creates Jobs? The Public Interest, 65, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, John, Clint Cummins, Zvi Griliches, Bronwyn H. Hall and Adam Jaffe (1984). Who does R&D and who patents? In Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 21–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm, Pontus and Bo Carlsson (1999). Industry clusters in Ohio and Sweden 1975–1995. Small Business Economics, 12(4), 279–293.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard E. (1998). Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(4), December, 1947–1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, Alok K. and Michael R. Halperin (1990). Technical performance and firm size: Analysis of patents and publications of U.S. firms. Small Business Economics, 2(3), 183–190.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D. Jr (1997). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M. and Steven Klepper (1991). Firm size versus diversity in the achievement of technological advance. In Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, eds. R. Schmalansee and R. Willig, 1059–1107. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M. and Steven Klepper (1992). The tradeoff between firm size and diversity in the pursuit of technological progress. Small Business Economics, 4(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M. and Richard C. Levin (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In Richard Schmalensee and Robert Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume II, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1059–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M., Richard C. Levin and David C. Mowery (1987). Firm size and R&D intensity: A reexamination. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, June, 543–565.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, William S. (1967). Market structure, product differentiation and industrial research. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81, 639–657.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, Robert A. and Mark Hirschey (1984). R&D, market structure and profits: A value based approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, November, 682–686.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, Robert A., Barry T. Hirsch and Mark Hirschey (1986). Union rent seeking, intangible capital, and the market value of the firm. Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, November, 567–577.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of' Economic Literature, 26, 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Keith L. and Theodore J. Gordon (1984). Characterization of innovations introduced on the U.S. market in 1982. The Futures Group, prepared for the U.S. Small Business Administration under Contract No. SBA-6050-OA82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Franklin M. and Peter Temin (1973). Returns to scale in research and development: What does the Schumpeterian hypothesis imply? Journal of Political Economy, 81, 56–70.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • FitzRoy, Felix R. and Kornelius Kraft (1990). Innovation, rent-sharing and the organization of labour in the Federal Republic of Germany. Small Business Economics, 2(2), 95–104.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • FitzRoy, Felix R. and Kornelius Kraft (1991). Firm size, growth and innovation: Some evidence from West Germany. In Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 152–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John K. (1956). American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power, revised edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellman Research Associates (1976). Indicators of international trends in technological innovation. Prepared for the National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellman Research Associates (1982). The relationship between industrial concentration, firm size, and technological innovation. Prepared for the Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration under award no. SBA-2633-OA-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A. (1995). What do we know about entry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., H. Kallal, J. Scheinkman and A. Shleife (1992). Growth of cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126–1152.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, Henry G. (1968). The determinants of industrial research and development: A study of the chemical, drug, and petroleum industries. Journal of Political Economy, 76(4), 292–306.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, Siegfried (1989). Zur Erfassung von Forschungs-and Entwicklungstatigkeit durch Patente. Naturwissenschaften, 76(4), 156–159.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, Siegfried and Georg Potkowik (1990). Patente und Wirtschaftszweige: Zusammenfiihrung der Internationalen Patentklassifikation und der Systematik der Wirtschaftszweige. Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(Spring), 92–116.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Bronwyn H., Zvi Griliches and Jerry A. Hausman (1986). Patents and R&D: Is there a lag? International Economic Review, 27, 265–302.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, Dietmar and Georg Licht (1996). Innovationsaktivitaeten kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, Adam B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, Adam B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5), 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B., M. Trajtenberg and R. Henderson (1993). Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63, 577–598.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, Boyan (1982). Selection and evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50(2), 649–670.

    MATH  MathSciNet  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, Boyan (2001). New technology and the small firm. Small Business Economics, 16(1), 53–55.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, Morton I. and Nancy L. Schwartz (1975). Market structure and innovation: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 13, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, Charlie and Ola Olsson (1998). Product innovation in small and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 10(1), 31–46.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, Alfred (1987). Measuring R&D in small firms: How much are we missing? Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(2), 253–256.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, Alfred (1991). Firm size and innovation: Reply to Scheirer. Small Business Economics, 3(2), 157–158.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, Alfred, Tom P. Poot and Jeroen O.N. Reiljnen (1991). Technical performance and firm size: Survey results from the Netherlands. In Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 84–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, Alfred and Bart Verspagen (1989). R&D and market structure: The impact of measurement and aggregation problems. Small Business Economics, 1(4), 297–302.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Meier and John T. Scott (1982). Scale economies in research and development: The Schumpeterian Hypothesis. Journal of Industrial Economics, 30, 239–249.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Konig, Heinz and Klaus F. Zimmermann (1986). Innovations, market structure and market dynamics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 142(1), 184–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, Simon (1962). Inventive activity: Problems of definition and measurement. In R.R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report, Princeton, NJ, pp. 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Richard C., Wesley M. Cohen and David C. Mowery (1985). R&D appropriability opportunity and market structure: New evidence on the Schumpeterian hypothesis. American Economic Review, 15, 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Richard C., Alvin K. Klevorick, Richard R. Nelson and Sydney G. Winter (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, 783–820.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Richard C. and Peter C. Reiss (1984). Tests of a Schumpeterian model of R&D and market structure. In Zvi Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, pp. 175–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, Georg and Eric Nerlinger (1997). Junge innovative Unterhemmen in Europa: Ein internationaler Vergleich. In Dietmar Harhoff (ed.), Unternehmensgruendungen: Empirische Analysen fuer die alten und neuen Bundeslaender. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, Georg, Erik Nerlinger and G. Berger (1995). Germany: NTBF literature review. Mannheim: ZEW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Albert N. (1995). The use of literature-based innovation output indicators for research evaluation. Small Business Economics, 7(6), 451–455.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Link, Albert N. and Barry Bozeman (1991). Innovative behavior in small-sized firms. Small Business Economics, 3(3), 179–184.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Link, Albert N. and John Rees (1990). Firm size, university based research, and the returns to R&D. Small Business Economics, 2(1), 25–32.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin (1968). Industrial Research and Technological Change. New York, NY: W.W. Norton, for the Cowles Foundation for Research Economics at Yale University, pp. 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin (1981). Composition of R&D expenditures: Relationship to size of firm, concentration, and innovative output. Review of Economics and Statistics, 63, November, 610–615.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin (1983). Industrial organization and technological change: Recent empirical findings. In John V. Craven (ed.), Industrial Organization, Antitrust, and Public Policy. The Hague: Kluwer-Nijhoff, pp. 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin (1984). Comment on using linked patent and R&D data to measure interindustry technology flows. In Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 462–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin, A. Romeo, M. Schwartz, D. Teece, S. Wagner and P. Brach (1982). Technology Transfer, Productivity, and Economic Policy. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Dennis C. (1967). The firm decision process: An econometric investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 81(1), 58–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board (1975). Science Indicators 1974. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1986). National Patterns of Science and Technology Resources 1986. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(2), 297–306.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nerlinger, Erik (1998). Standorte und Entwicklung junger innovative Unterhehmen: Empirische Ergebnisse fuer West-Deutschland [Location and the Development of Young, Innovative Firms: Empirical Evidence for West Germany]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenlander, Karl Heinz (1990). Investitionsverhalten and Marktstruktur-Empirische Ergebnisse für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In B. Gahlen (ed.), Marktstruktur and gesamtwirtschaftliche Entwicklung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakes, Ariel (1985). On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 390–409.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pakes, Ariel and Zvi Griliches (1980). Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report. Economics Letters, 5, 377–381.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pakes, Ariel and Zvi Griliches (1984). Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look. In Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, pp. 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, Keith, M. Robson and J. Townsend (1987). The size dstribution of innovating firms in the U.K.: 1945–1983. Journal of Industrial Economics, 55, 291–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, Stephen (1999). Under-reporting of R&D in small firms: The impact on international R&D comparisons. Small Business Economics, 12(2), 131–135.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, Roy (1989). Small firms, innovation and industrial change. Small Business Economics, 1(1), 51–64.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Santarelli, E. and A. Sterlachinni (1990). Innovation, formal vs. informal R&D, and firm size: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics, 2(2), 223–228.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1990). Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 33, 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic M. (1965a). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review, 55, 1097–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic M. (1965b). Size of firm, oligopoly and research: A comment. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 31, 256–266.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic M. (1967). Market structure and the employment of scientists and engineers. American Economic Review, 57, 524–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic, M. (1982). Inter-industry technology flows in the United States. Research Policy, 11, 227–245.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic M. (1983a). Concentration, R&D, and productivity change. Southern Economic Journal, 50, 221–225.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic M. (1983b). The propensity to patent. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1, 107–128.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic M. (1984). Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic, M. (1988). Testimony before the subcommittee on monopolies and commercial law. Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, February 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic M. (1991). Changing perspectives on the firm size problem. In Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, edited by Z.J. Acs and D.B. Audretsch. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulenburg, J.-Matthias Graf von der and Joachim Wagner (1991). Advertising, innovation and market structure: A comparison of the United States of America and the Federal Republic of Germany. In Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 160–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulenburg, J.-Matthias Graf von der and Joachim Wagner (1992). Unobservable industry characteristics and the innovation-concentration-advertising maze: Evidence from an econometric study using panel data for manufacturing industries in the FRG 1979–1986. Small Business Economics, 4(3), 210–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbach, Joachim and Klaus F. Zimmermann (1991). A Poisson model of patenting and firm structure in Germany. In Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, John T. (1984). Firm versus industry variability in R&D intensity. In Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soete, Luc L.G. (1979). Firm size and inventive activity: The evidence reconsidered. European Economic Review, 12, 319–340.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, John (1997). Gibrat's legacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, Bob, Rene den Hertog, Bert Menkveld and Roy Thurik (1997). Some new evidence on the determinants of large-and small-firm innovation. Small Business Economics, 9(4), 335–343.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner Joachim (1994). Small firm entry in manufacturing industries: Lower Saxony 1979–1989. Small Business Economics, 6(3), 211–224.

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Joachim (1995). Firm size and job creation in Germany. Small Business Economics, 7(6), 469–474.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Baltimore, Baltimore

    Zoltan J. Acs

  2. Indiana University, Indiana

    David B. Audretsch

Authors
  1. Zoltan J. Acs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David B. Audretsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Baltimore, Baltimore

    Zoltan J. Acs

  2. Indiana University, Indiana

    David B. Audretsch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B. (2003). Innovation and Technological Change. In: Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24519-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24519-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24080-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-24519-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive