Skip to main content

Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Mediated Learning Environments with Cooperation Scripts

  • Chapter
Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Knowledge Communication

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 5))

Abstract

Collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning environments poses difficulties regarding what tasks learners work on and how learners interact with each other. Learners who collaboratively construct knowledge in computer-mediated learning environments sometimes construct inadequate conceptions of a subject and rashly build consensus regarding these conceptions. Collaborative learning tasks can be structured through cooperation scripts. It is unclear, how cooperation scripts could be designed for different tasks and different technologies for computer-mediated communication. In this chapter, two studies with a 2×2-design will be reported that applied social and epistemic cooperation scripts in computer-mediated learning environments based on web-based discussion boards and videoconferencing technologies. Results show that social cooperation scripts substantially foster the processes of collaborative knowledge construction as well as learning outcomes. Epistemic cooperation scripts facilitate the processes of collaborative knowledge construction, but have no or negative effects on learning outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, A. H., O'Malley, C., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Lanton, S., Newlands, A., Mullin, J., Fleming, A. M., & Van der Felden, J. (1997). The impact of VCM on collaborative problem solving: An analysis of task performance, communicative process, and user satisfaction. In K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, & S. B. Wilbur (Eds.), Video-mediated communication (pp. 51–74). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L. W. & Dansereau, D. F. (1983). Effects of structural schema training and text organization on expository prose processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 811–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction. Essays in the honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 393–451). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., Weinberger, A., Jucks, R., Spitulnik, M, & Wallace, R. (2003). Designing effective science inquiry in text-based computer supported collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research & Practice, 4(1), 55–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E. B. (1995). Learning by explaining: Fostering collaborative progressive discourse in science. In R. J. Beun, M. Baker, & M. Reiner (Eds.), Dialogue and instruction: Modeling interaction in intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 123–135). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning. Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Amsterdam: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W. (1990). System and metasystem in cognitive operations. In M. Carretero, M. L. Pope, P. R. J. Simons, & J. I. Pozo (Eds.), Learning and instruction: European research in an international context (pp. 125–139). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W. & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertl, B., Reiserer, M. & Mandl, H. (2002). Kooperatives Lernen in Videokonferenzen [Cooperative learning in videoconferences], Unterrichtswissenschaft, 30, 339–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, F., Graves, M., Hartfield, B., & Winograd, T. (1988). Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction. ACM Trans. on Information Systems, 6(2), 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyken, A., Mandl, H., & Reiter, W. (1998). Selbstgesteuertes Lernen mit Tele-Tutoring [Self-guided learning through tele-tutoring]. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Multimedia und TeleLearning [Multimedia and telelearning] (pp. 181–196). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzley, R. M., Avanzino, S. & Bor, A. (2001). Simulated Computer-Mediated / Video-Interactive Distance Learning: A Test of Motivation, Interaction Satisfaction, Delivery, Learning & Perceived Effectiveness. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hron, A., Hesse, F. W., Reinhard, P., & Picard, E. (1997). Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen [Structured cooperation in computer-supported collaborative learning]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 25(1), 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S. (1992). Talking, teaching, and learning in network groups: Lessons from research. In A. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. The Najaden Papers (pp. 147–165). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, C. O., Dansereau, D. F., O'Donnell, A. M., Hytecker, V. I., Lambiotte, J. G., & Rocklin, T. R. (1985). Effects of metacognitive and elaborative activity on cooperative learning and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 342–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. & Burbules, N. C. (1993). Construction of knowledge and group learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 91–119). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl, A. (1996). Communities of practice toward expertise: Social foundation of university instruction. In P. B. Baltes & U. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds. Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 394–411). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, E. M., Hartley, K., Sinatra, G. M., Reynolds, R. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (2002, April). Enhancing the quality of on-line discussions. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 179–196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, A. M. & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interactions in cooperative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120–141). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., Hall, R. H., & Rocklin, T. R. (1987). Cognitive, social/affective, and metacognitive outcomes of scripted cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 431–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, B. J. (2002). Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B. & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249–268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype-environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research for the future. Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, S. G. & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D. & Hundhausen, C. D. (2001). Learning by constructing collaborative representations: An empirical comparison of three alternatives. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 577–592). Maastricht, NL: University of Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361–384). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerman, A. L. & Treasure-Jones, T. (1999). Software for problem solving through collaborative argumentation. In P. Coirier & J. E. B. Andriessen (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 203–230). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering computer supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts and scaffolds. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Boulder, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2003). Gemeinsame Wissenskonstruktion in computervermittelter Kommunikation: Wirkungen von Kooperationsskripts auf den Erwerb anwendungsorientierten Wissens? [Collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated communication: Effects of cooperation scripts on acquisition of application-oriented knowledge]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 211(2), 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A. & Mandl, H. (2003). Computer-mediated knowledge communication. Special Issue: New Media in Education. Studies in Communication Sciences, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., Mandl, H. (2005). Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Mediated Learning Environments with Cooperation Scripts. In: Bromme, R., Hesse, F.W., Spada, H. (eds) Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Knowledge Communication. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24319-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics