Abstract
For arriving at a better understanding of the Peircean notion of diagrammatic reasoning there appear to be two complementary ways. One way is to substantiate its impact and relevance by interpreting actual mathematical reasoning as being diagrammatic. This in fact can be done in a great variety of cases. Another way is to exhibit cases of mathematical notions, concepts and arguments which inherently do not lend themselves in a direct way to diagrammatic reasoning. Analyzing those examples will again sharpen and refine the notions of diagram and diagrammatic reasoning. Or, it might possibly point to the necessity of widening those notions to comprise also the manipulation of words and linguistic terms according to specific rules. The latter two topics are the main issues treated in the paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bondy, J. A., Murty, U. S. R. (1976). Graph Theory with Applications. New York: North Holland.
Dörfler, W. (2002). Formation of Mathematical Objects as Decision Making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 4.4, 337–350.
Dörfler, W. (2003). Diagrams as Means and Objects of Mathematical Reasoning. To appear in: Developments in Mathematics Education in German-speaking Countries. Selected Papers from the Annual Conference on Didactics of Mathematics.
Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2002). Erkenntnisentwicklung. Ein semiotisch-pragmatischer Ansatz. Dresden: Habilitationsschrift.
Klaua, D. (1979). Mengenlehre. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Otte, M. (1997a). Analysis und Synthesis in Mathematics from the Perspective of Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy. In M. Otte & M. Panza (Eds.), Analysis and Synthesis in Mathematics. History and Philosophy. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 196. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 327–364.
Otte, M. (1997b). Mathematik und Verallgemeinerung — Peirce’ semiotisch-pragmatische Sicht. Philosophia naturalis 34, 175–222.
Otte, M. (1998). Limits of Constructivism: Kant, Piaget and Peirce. Science Education, 7, 425–450.
Peirce, Ch. S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers I–VIII. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dörfler, W. (2005). Diagrammatic Thinking. In: Hoffmann, M.H., Lenhard, J., Seeger, F. (eds) Activity and Sign. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24270-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24270-8_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24269-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-24270-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)