Skip to main content

Experimental Evidence on the Endogenous Entry of Bidders in Internet Auctions

  • Conference paper
Experimental Business Research

Abstract

This paper tests the empirical predictions of recent theories of the endogenous entry of bidders in auctions. Data come from a field experiment, involving sealed-bid auctions for collectible trading cards over the Internet. Manipulating the reserve prices in the auctions as an experimental treatment variable generates several results. First, observed participation behavior indicates that bidders consider their bid submission to be costly, and that bidder participation is indeed an endogenous decision. Second, the participation is more consistent with a mixed-strategy entry equilibrium than with a deterministic equilibrium. Third, the data reject the prediction that the profit-maximizing reserve price is greater than or equal to the auctioneer’s salvage value for the good, showing instead that a zero reserve price provides higher expected profits in this case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bajari, Patrick and Ali Hortacsu. (Summer 2003). “The Winner's Curse, Reserve Prices, and Endogenous Entry: Empirical Insights from eBay Auctions.” RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 329–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Jason. Cloister's Magic Card Price List, <http://www.hhhh.org/cloister/pricelists/>, various weekly issues.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, James C., Samuel H. Dinkin, and James T. Swarthout. (October 2001). “Endogenous Entry and Exit in Common Value Auctions.” Experimental Economics, 4(2), 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, James C., Bruce Roberson, and Vernon L. Smith. (1982). “Theory and Behavior of Single Object Auctions,” in Research in Experimental Economics, Vernon L. Smith, ed., Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans, Richard. (June 1987). “On Optimal Reservation Prices in Auctions.” Management Science, 33(6), 763–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans, Richard. (1992). “Optimal Auctions Revisited.” Games and Economic Behavior, 5, 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, Kenneth, and Harry J. Paarsch. (1995). “A Survey of Recent Empirical Work Concerning Auctions.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 28(2), 315–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, John H. (1995). “Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research,” in The Handbook of Experimental Economics, J. Kagel and A. Roth, eds. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 501–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Dan, and James L. Smith. (1994). “Equilibrium in Auctions with Entry.” American Economic Review, 84(3), 585–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Dan, and James L. Smith. (1996). “Optimal Reservation Prices in Auctions.” Economic Journal, 106, 1271–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucking-Reiley, David. (1999). “Using Field Experiments to Test Equivalance Between Auction Formets: Magic on the Internet.” American Economic Review, 89(5), 1063–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. Preston, and John McMillan. (1987a). “Auctions and Bidding.” Journal of Economic Literature, 25(2), 699–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. Preston, and John McMillan. (1987b). “Auctions with Entry.” Economics Letters, 23(4), 343–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. Preston, Daniel Quan, and Daniel Vincent. (2002). “How to Set Optimal Minimum Bids, with an Application to Real Estate Auctions.” Journal of Industrial Economics, (50)4, 391–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, John, (1994). “Selling Spectrum Rights.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(3), 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul R., and Robert J. Weber. (1982). “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding.” Econometrica, 50, 1089–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, Thomas R., and Svetlana Pevnitskaya, (August 2003). “Endogenous Entry and Self-Selection in Private-Value Auctions: An Experimental Study.” Caltech Social Science working paper #1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pevnitskaya, Svetlana, (January 2004). “Endogenous Entry in First-Price Private-Value Auctions: The Selection Effect.” Ohio State University working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiley, David H. (August 2004). “Field Experiments on the Effects of Reserve Prices in Auctions: More Magic on the Internet,” University of Arizona working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, John G., and William Samuelson, (1981). “Optimal Auctions.” American Economic Review, 71(3), 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, William F. (1985). “Competitive Bidding with Entry Costs.” Economics Letters, 17, 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, James L, and Dan Levin, (2001). “Entry Coordination, Market Thickness, and Social Welfare.” International Journal of Game Theory, 30, 321–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, William. (1961). “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders.” Journal of Finance, 16(1), 8–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Robert. (1992). “Strategic Analysis of Auctions,” in The Handbook of Game Theory, R.J. Aumann and S. Hart, eds. New York: North-Holland, 227–279.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reiley, D.H. (2005). Experimental Evidence on the Endogenous Entry of Bidders in Internet Auctions. In: Rapoport, A., Zwick, R. (eds) Experimental Business Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24243-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics