Stochastic Modeling and Optimization of Complex Infrastructure Systems

  • P. Thoft-Christensen
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 166)

Abstract

In this paper it is shown that recent progress in stochastic modeling and optimization in combination with advanced computer systems has now made it possible to improve the design and the maintenance strategies for infrastructure systems. The paper concentrates on highway networks and single large bridges. United States has perhaps the largest highway networks in the world with more than 6 million kilometers of roadway and more than 0.5 million highway bridges; see [2]. About 40% of these bridges are considered deficient and more than $50 billion is estimated needed to correct the deficiencies; see [12]. The percentage of substandard bridges deemed to require urgent actions in other countries such as Prance (15%) and UK (20%) is also high; see [3].

Keywords

Stochastic modeling Infrastructure systems Bridge management systems Suspension bridges 

References

  1. [1]
    C. Andrade, C. Alonso, and F.J. Molina. Cover cracking as a function of bar corrosion: Part 1-experimental test. Materials and Structures, 26:453–464, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S.B. Chase. The bridge maintenance programme of the united states federal highway administration, 1999. In: Management of Highway Structures (Editor: P.C. Das). Thomas Telford, pp. 14–23.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    P.C. Das. Prioritization of bridge maintenance needs, 1999. In: Case Studies in Optimal Design and Maintenance Planning of Civil Infrastructure Systems (Editor D.M. Prangopol), ASCE, pp. 26–44.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Simiu E. and R.H. Scanlan. Wind Effects on Structures: Fundamentals and Applications to Design. Third Edition. John Wiley and Sons, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    P. Thoft-Christensen (Editor). Assessment of performance and optimal strategies for inspection and maintenance of concrete structures using reliability based expert systems, 2002. Report. CSRconsult ApS, Aalborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D.M. Frangopol. Optimum maintenance strategies for different bridge types, vol. 1, steel/concrete composite bridges, 2000. Final Report, HA-project 3/179.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D.M. Frangopol. Preventive maintenance strategies for bridge groups — analysis-vol.1, 2003. Final Report, HA-project 3/344(B).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    H.I. Hansen. Active Vibration Control of Long Suspension Bridges. PhD thesis, Aalborg University, Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg, Denmark, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    T. Huynh. Suspension Bridge Aerodynamics and Active Vibration Control. PhD thesis, Aalborg University, Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg, Denmark, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Y. Liu and R.E. Weyers. Modelling of the time to corrosion cracking in chloride contaminated reinforced concrete structures. ACI Materials Journal, 95:675–681, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    K.H. Ostenfeld and A. Larsen. Bridge engineering and aerodynamics, 1992. In: Aerodynamics of Large Bridges (editor A. Larsen), Proc. First Int. Symp. Aerodynamics of Large Bridges, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.E. Roberts. Bridge management for the 21st century, 2001. In: Maintaining the Safety of Deteriorating Civil Infrastructures (Editors A. Miyamoto and D.M. Frangopol), Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    R.H. Scanlan and J.J. Tomko. Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives. J.Eng.Mech.Div., ASCE, Paper 8601:1717–1737, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    T. Theodorsen. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter, 1935. NACA Report No. 496.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. Thoft-Christensen. Advanced bridge management systems. Structural Engineering Review, 7:151–163, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    P. Thoft-Christensen. Estimation of the service lifetime of concrete bridges, 1997. In: Proc. ASCE Structures Congress XV, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    P. Thoft-Christensen. Estimation of reliability distributions for reinforced concrete overbridges, 1998. HA-project 3/179, Working Document CSR-WD01.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. Thoft-Christensen. Optimum maintenance strategies for different bridge types, vol. 2, concrete bridges, 2000. Final Report, HA-project 3/179.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    P. Thoft-Christensen. Stochastic modelling of the crack initiation time for reinforced concrete structures, 2000. In: Proc. ASCE 2000 Structures Congress, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    P. Thoft-Christensen. What happens with reinforced concrete structures when the reinforcement corrodes?, 2001. Keynote Speech at the 2nd International Workshop on Life-Cycle Cost Analysis and Design of Civil Infrastructure Systems, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan. Proceedings: Maintaining the Safety of Deteriorating Civil Infrastructures, 2001, pp. 35–46.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    P. Thoft-Christensen. Modelling corrosion cracks, 2003. Presented at the IFIP TC-7, Conference, Sophia Antipolis, France.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    P. Thoft-Christensen. Preventive maintenance strategies for bridge groups-analysis-vol.2, 2003. Final Report, HA-project 3/344(B).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    P. Thoft-Christensen and C. Frier. Estimation of preventive maintenance costs using simulation, 2003. Report CSR-08, Aalborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    P. Thoft-Christensen and F.M. Jensen. Revision of the bridge assessment rules based on whole life performance: Concrete, 1996. Final Report, HA-project DPU 9/3/44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Thoft-Christensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Building Technology and Structural EngineeringAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations