Skip to main content

Quantitative Measurement of Antibiotic Use

  • Chapter
Book cover Antibiotic Policies

Conclusions

In conclusion, we are only really at the start of learning how best to measure and monitor antibiotic consumption. Computer programmes are increasingly useful but computerised prescribing for the majority, allowing proper audit of quality of use is still on the distant horizon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bager, F., 2000, DANMAP: Monitoring antimicrobial resistance in Denmark. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 14, 271–274.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cars, O., Mölstad, S., and Melander, A., 2001, Variation in antibiotic use in the European Union. Lancet, 357, 1851–1853.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowcroft, N. S., Ronveaux, O., Monnet, D. L., and Mertens, R., 1999, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and antimicrobial use in Belgian hospitals. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol., 20, 31–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, M. and Grimshaw, J., November 1997, Common study design issues. Changing Professional Practice Newsletter. Available from: http://www.dsi.dk/projects/cpp/Newsletters/News-3.html.

  • Fridkin, S. K., Steward, C. D., Edwards, J. R., Pryor, E. R., McGowan, J. E. M. Jr., Archibald, L. K. et al., 1999, Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in United States hospitals: Project ICARE phase 2. Clin. Infect. Dis., 29, 245–252.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gastmeier, P., Sohr, D., Forster, D., Schulgen, G., Schumacher, M., Daschner, F. et al., 2000, Identifying outliers of antibiotic usage in prevalence studies on nosocomial infections. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol., 21, 324–328.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silber, J. L., Paul, S. M., Crane, G., Kupersmit, A., and Spitalny, K., 1994, Influence of hospital antibiotic policy and usage on the incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) bacteremia [abstract]. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol., 15, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Lozano, J. M., Monnet, D. L., Yague, A., Burgos, A., Gonzalo, N., Campillos, P. et al., 2000, Modelling and forecasting antimicrobial resistance and its dynamic relationship to antimicrobial use: A time series analysis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 14, 21–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, F. M., Lopez-Lozano, J. M., Beyaert, A., Monnet, D., Camacho, M., Stuart, D. et al., 2004, The role of antimicrobial use in the Aberdeen MRSA outbreak 1996–2000. Emerg. Infect. Dis. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mölstad, S., Lundborg, C. S., Karlsson, A.-K., and Cars, O., 2002, Antibiotic prescription rates vary markedly between 13 European countries. Scand. J. Infect. Dis., 34, 366–371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monnet, D. L., 2003, ABC Calc—Antibiotic Consumption Calculator [Microsoft Excel® Application]. Version 1.9. Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen (Denmark).

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnet, D. L., Lopez-Lozano, J. M., Campillos, P., Burgos, A., Yague, A., Gonzalo, N., 2001, Making sense of antimicrobial use and resistance surveillance data: application of ARIMA and transfer function models. Clin Microbiol Infect., 7(Suppl 5), 29–36. Review.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monnet, D. L., Soerensen, T. L., and Johansen, H. L., 2000, Comparison of the level of antimicrobial use in hospitals and in primary health care, Denmark, 1997 [abstract]. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol., 21, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronning, M., Salvesen Blix, H., Harbo, B. T., and Strom, H., 2000, Different versions of the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system and the defined daily dose—are drug utilisation data comparable? Eur. Clin. Pharmacol., 56, 723–727.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ronning, M., Salvesen Blix, H., Strom, H., Skovlund, E., Anderson, M., and Vander Stichele, R., 2003, Problems in collecting coparable national drug use data in Europe: The example of antibacterials. Eur. J Clin. Pharmacol., 58, 843–849.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (Norway), 2002a, Guidelines for ATC Classification and DDD Assignment. WHO Collaborating Centre, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (Norway), 2002b, ATC Index with DDDs. WHO Collaborating Centre, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. L., Friedrich, L. V., Mihm, L. B., and Bosso, J. A., 2000, Assessment of the relationship between antimicrobial usage and susceptibility: Differences between the hospital and specific patient-care areas. Clin. Infect. Dis., 31, 16–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacKenzie, F.M., Gould, I.M. (2005). Quantitative Measurement of Antibiotic Use. In: Gould, I.M., van der Meer, J.W.M. (eds) Antibiotic Policies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22852-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics