Advertisement

Speech Segregation: Problems and Perspectives

  • Chris Darwin

Keywords

Sound Source Interaural Time Difference Auditory Object Perceptual Separation Auditory Scene Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bregman, A.S., 1990, Auditory Scene Analysis: the perceptual organisation of sound, Bradford Books (MIT Press), Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  2. Bregman, A.S. and Ahad, P., 1995, Compact Disc: Demonstrations of auditory scene analysis Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
  3. Bronkhorst, A.W. and Plomp, R., 1988, The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1508–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Culling, J.F. and Summerfield, Q., 1995, Perceptual separation of concurrent speech sounds: absence of across-frequency grouping by common interaural delay, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 785–797.Google Scholar
  5. Darwin, C.J., Akeroyd, M.A. and Hukin, R.W., 2002, Binaural factors in auditory continuity, Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Auditory Display, July 2–5, 2002, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 259–262.Google Scholar
  6. Darwin, C.J. and Hukin, R.W., 1999, Auditory objects of attention: the role of interaural time-differences, J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Perc. & Perf. 25, 617–629.Google Scholar
  7. Drennan, W.R., Gatehouse, S. and Lever, C., 2003, Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: the role of spatial location, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2178–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hukin, R.W. and Darwin, C.J., 1995, Effects of contralateral presentation and of interaural time differences in segregating a harmonic from a vowel, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1380–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levin, T.C. and Edgerton, M.E., 1999, The throat singers of Tuva, Scientific American September 1999.Google Scholar
  10. Sach, A.J. and Bailey, P.J. (in press) Some aspects of auditory spatial attention revealed using rhythmic masking release, J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Perc. & Perf.Google Scholar
  11. Varga, A.P. and Moore, R.K., 1990, Hidden Markov Model decomposition of speech and noise, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Albuquerque. pp.845–848.Google Scholar
  12. Woods, W.A. and Colburn, S., 1992, Test of a model of auditory object formation using intensity and interaural time difference discriminations, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2894–2902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Darwin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology School of Life SciencesUniversity of SussexUK

Personalised recommendations