Skip to main content

Ophthalmic Patients

  • Chapter

Conclusion

Rapid and appropriate AE of patients with serious eye injuries is an absolutely critical step in facilitating a favorable outcome when these injuries occur in locations where definitive ophthalmologic evaluation and treatment is not available. Therefore, expedient delivery of the patient to definitive care typically overrides any altitude restrictions. One exception is for patients who have had surgical introduction of intraocular gas in a closed globe. Further, there are no absolute contraindications for moving ocular injuries, and a decision regarding AE profiles must take into consideration other patients and factors related to the contingency situation. It is critical for medical triage personnel in the field to make the proper clinical and evacuation decisions early in the course of the injury.

Future providers will be challenged with new and expanding threats, such as the proliferation of lasers on the battlefields of tomorrow. Telemedicine communication in the future may facilitate field triage by extending ophthalmologic intervention and decisions directly to the scene. Certainly, every effort should be made to prevent eye injuries. However, when injuries do occur the modern combatant can take comfort that a modern AE system will help ensure that definitive medical care is obtained more quickly than before.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hornblas A. Ocular war injuries in South Vietnam. Surg Forum 1973;24:500–502.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wong TY, Seet B, Ang C. Eye injuries in twentieth century warfare: A historical perspective. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;41:433–459.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tredici T. Management ophthalmic casualties in Southeast Asia. Milit Med 1968;133:355–362.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dausey-Browning GC. The value of ophthalmic treatment in the field. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;28:87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scott GI, Michaelson IG. An analysis and follow-up of 301 cases of battle casualty injury to the eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 1946;30:42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leedham CS, Bood CG, Newland C. A descriptive analysis of wounds among US Marines treated at second-echelon facilities in the Kuwait theater of operations. Milit Med 1993;158: 508–512.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hornblas A. Eye injuries in the military. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1981;21:121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Treister G. Ocular casualties in the 6-Day War. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;68:669–675.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cruise RR. Protection of the eye in warfare. Br J Ophthalmol 1917;1:489–492.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heier JS, et al. Ocular injuries and diseases at a combat support hospital in support of Operation Desert Shield and Desert Storm. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:795–798.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ivan DJ, et al. Laser induced acute visual and cognitive incapacitation of aircrew, protection, management, and cockpit integration. In: Proceedings of the NATO Advisory Group on Aeromedical Research and Development. 1998. AGARDOGRAPH AR-354, chapter 12, AGARD, Neuilly sur-Seire, France. pp 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brinton GS, et al. Post-traumatic endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:547–550.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. David DB, et al. Bacillus endophthalimitis. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:577–580.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohm J. Uber die Behandlung der Netzhautablosung durch operative Entkeering der subretinalen Flussigkeit und Einspritzung von Luft in den Glaskorper. Graefes Arch Klin Ophthalmol 1911;79:442–450.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Norton EWD. Intraocular gas in the management of selected retinal detachments. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol 1973;77:85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dieckert JP, et al. Air travel and intraocular gas. Ophthalmology 1986;93:642–645.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lincoff H, et al. Air travel and intraocular gas, I. The mechanisms for compensation. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:902–906.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mills MD, et al. An assessment of intraocular pressure rise in patients with gas-filled eyes during simulated air flight. Ophthalmology 2001;108:40–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bergan L, et al. Medical guidelines for air travel. ASEM 1996;67(suppl):B14–B15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chang S. Retina. Mosby, Philadelphia, 1994. vol 3. chapter 131, pp 2115–2129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ivan, D.J. (2003). Ophthalmic Patients. In: Hurd, W.W., Jernigan, J.G. (eds) Aeromedical Evacuation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22699-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22699-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98604-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22699-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics