Skip to main content

Why Is Understanding Urban Ecosystems an Important Frontier for Education and Educators?

  • Chapter
Understanding Urban Ecosystems

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1989. Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Project 2061. Benchmarks for science literacy. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Geological Institute (AGI). 1991. Earth science content guidelines for grades K-12. American Geological Institute, Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkin, J.M., and P. Black. 1997. Policy perils of international comparisons: The TIMSS case. Phi Delta Kappan 79(1):22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Civic Education. 1994. National standards for civics and government. Calabasas, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D.K., and H.C. Hill. 1998. State policy and classroom performance: mathematics reform in California. CPRE Policy Briefs. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. 1994. National standards for arts education: What every young American should know and be able to do in the arts. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. 1989. Empowering minority students. California Association for Bilingual Education, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., and D.L. Ball 1998. Teaching for high standards: what policymakers need to know and be able to do. CPRE Joint report Series, co-published with the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future, JRE-04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Gaitan, C. 1987. Parent perceptions of school: supportive environment for children. In H. Trueba, ed. Success or failure? Learning and the language minority student. Newbury House Publishers, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Week. 1998. Quality counts: the urban challenge, public education in the 50 states. In Collaboration with the Pew Charitable Trusts. 17(17), January 8, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Week. 1999. Quality counts’ 99: rewarding results, punishing failure. 18(17), January 11, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, E. 1991. Education of linguistically and culturally diverse students: effective instructional practices (Educational Practice Report 1). University of California, Santa Cruz, National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning, Santa Cruz, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geography Education Standards Project. 1994. Geography for life. National Geographic Research and Exploration, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R.A. 1992. Children’s participation: from tokenism to citizenship. Innocenti Essays No. 4. UNICEF International Child Development Centre, Florence, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. 1997. Children’s participation: the theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. UNICEF, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A.T., ed. 1989. The evidence continues to grow: parent involvement improves student achievement. National Committee for Citizens in Education, Columbia, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., and C. Aulicino. 1998. Summing it up: a review of survey data on education and the National Education Goals. A report from Public Agenda. Paper prepared for the National Education Goals Panel, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on National Health Education Standards. (1995). National health education standards: Achieving health literacy. Association for the Advancement of Health Education. Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., L.M. Crasco, R.B. Smith, G. Johnson, A. Karantonis, and D.J. Leavitt. 2001. Academic excellence for all urban students. Their accomplishments in science and mathematics. How reform works: an evaluative study of NSF’s Urban Systemic Initiatives. Systemic Research, Inc. Norwood, MA. http://www.siurbanstudy.org/newspublication http://systemic.xohost.com/usi/Booklet.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J.S. 1993. Learning science by doing science. In R. Yager, ed. What research says to the science teacher: science, society, and technology. National Science Teacher Association. Washington, DC. http://hi-ce.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzo, K.K. 1998. Making learning authentic: lessons from a dirty river. Education Week, October 1, 1998, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. 1999. Teacher training debate extends to colleges. Washington Post, December 6, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, K.H., and L. Darling-Hammond. 1998. Rethinking the reallocation of teaching resources: some lessons from high performing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Spring 1998, 20(1):9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2000. Quality of elementary and secondary school environments: teachers1 perspectives and quality of public school teachers. Available at http://www.nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2000/section4/indicator47.html

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 1997a. America’s teachers: profile of a profession, 1993–1994. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. NCES 97–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 1997b. The condition of education 1997. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2000. Digest of education statistics 1999. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2002. The nation’s report card. 2000 science assessment results. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC. http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for History in the Schools. (1994a). National standards for United States history: exploring the American Experience. (Expanded ed.). Los Angeles: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for History in the Schools. (1994b). National standards for world history: Exploring paths to the present. (Expanded ed.). Los Angeles: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for History in the Schools. (1996). National standards for history. (Basic ed.). Los Angeles: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 1989. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Education Goals Panel. 1999. The national education goals report: building a nation of learners. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). 1999. Global perspective for local action: using TIMSS to improve U.S. mathematics and science education. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (NSF). 2000a. Urban systemic program in science, mathematics, and technology education: a foundation for K-12 science and mathematics educational system reform. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf0034

  • National Science Foundation (NSF). 1999. Annual Report for FY 1999. Education and Human Resources (EHR), Division of Educational System Reform (ESR).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (NSF). 2001a. Annual Report for FY 2000. Education and Human Resources (EHR), Division of Educational System Reform (ESR). http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/gpra/anrpt/2000/ESR2000anrpt.html

  • National Science Foundation (NSF). 2000b. Science and Engineering Indicators 2000 Vol. I. NSB-00-1, National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. 1998. Low on teachers, New York recruits in Austria. Jacques Steinberg, July 11, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Day, J.A., and M.S. Smith. 1993. Systemic reform and educational opportunity. Pages 250–312 in S.H. Fuhrman, ed. Designing Coherent Policy: Improving the System. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, R.E. 1999. Connecting the schools and community through the education of students in geographic information systems. Cary Conference VIII, April 27–29, 2000, Millbrook, New York. http://www.ecostudies.org/cary8/raymond/raymond.html 11 August 2000.

  • Silver, E.A. 1995. Shuffling the deck to ensure fairness in dealing: a commentary on some issues of equity and mathematics education from the perspective of the QUASAR project. A paper presented at the Seventeenth Annual Meeting for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (North American Chapter), October 21–24, 1995. Available from the Educational Resources Information Center (document number ED 389 538).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Urban Teacher Collaborative. 2000. The urban teacher challenge: teacher demand and supply in the great city schools. Recruiting New Teachers, Inc., Belmont, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. 2002. Budget Summary—Elementary and Secondary, FY 2002. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC. http://www.ed.gov/offices/OUS/budget02/summary/chapter1.html

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hollweg, K.S., Pea, C.H., Berkowitz, A.R. (2003). Why Is Understanding Urban Ecosystems an Important Frontier for Education and Educators?. In: Understanding Urban Ecosystems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22615-X_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22615-X_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95496-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22615-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics