Advertisement

Inventory and Monitoring Studies

Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)

Keywords

Adaptive Management Population Trend Monitoring Study Recovery Plan Forest Plan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, T.F.H., and T.W. Hoekstra. 1992. Towards a unified ecology. Columbia Univ. Pr., New York.Google Scholar
  2. Block, W.M., and L.A. Brennan. 1993. The habitat concept in ornithology: Theory and applications. In D.M. Power (ed.). Current Ornithology, vol. 11, pp. 35–91. Plenum Pr., New York.Google Scholar
  3. Block, W.M., M.L. Morrison, J. Verner, and P.N. Manley. 1994. Assessing wildlife-habitatrelationships models: A case study with California oak woodlands. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 22(4):549–561.Google Scholar
  4. Burnham, K.P., and D.R. Anderson. 1998. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretical Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Clements, F.E. 1920. Plant Indicators. Carnegie Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling Techniques, 3d ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, M.B. 1989. Retrospective studies. In G.E. Likens (ed.). Long-Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives, pp. 71–89. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Efron, B. 1982. The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Soc. Industrial Appl. Math., Philadelphia, PA. 92 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Fleiss, J.L. 1981. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2d ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Franklin, J.F. 1989. Importance and justification of long-term studies in ecology. In G.E. Likens (ed.). Long-Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives, pp. 3–19. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Gray, P.A., D. Cameron, and I. Kirkham. 1996. Wildlife habitat evaluation in forested ecosystems: Some examples from Canada and the United States. In R.M. DeGraaf and R.I. Miller (eds.). Conservation of Faunal Diversity in Forested Landscapes, pp. 407–536. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  12. Green, R.H. 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Hayek, L.C. 1994. Analysis of amphibian biodiversity data. In W.R. Heyer, M.A. Donnelly, R.W. McDiarmid, L.C. Hayek, and M.S. Foster (eds.). Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians, pp. 207–269. Smithsonian Institution Pr., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Heyer, W.R., M.A. Donnelly, R.W. McDiarmid, L.C. Hayek, and M.S. Foster. 1994. Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Pr., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Hohn, M.E. 1976. Binary coefficients: A theoretical and empirical study. J. Int. Assoc. Math. Geol. 8:137–150.Google Scholar
  16. Hunter, M.L., Jr. 1991. Coping with ignorance: The coarse filter strategy for maintaining biodiversity. In K.A. Kohm (ed.). Balancing on the Brink of Extinction: The Endangered Species Act and Lessons for the Future, pp. 266–281. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. Hurlbert, S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54:187–211.Google Scholar
  18. Jaccard, P. 1901. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol. 11:37–50.Google Scholar
  19. Landres, P.B., J. Verner, and J.W. Thomas, 1988. Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: A critique. Conserv. Biol. 2:316–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marascuilo, L.A., and M. McSweeny. 1977. Nonparametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
  21. McCullough, D.R., and R.H. Barrett. 1992. Wildlife 2001: Populations. Elsevier, London.Google Scholar
  22. Miller, R.I. 1996. Modern approaches to monitoring changes in forests using maps. In R.M. DeGraaf and R.I. Miller (eds.). Conservation of Faunal Diversity in Forested Landscapes, pp. 595–614. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  23. Moir, W.H., and W.M. Block. Adaptive management on public lands in the United States: Commitment or rhetoric? Environ. Manage. (in press).Google Scholar
  24. Morrison, M.L. 1986. Birds as indicators of environmental change. Curr. Ornithol. 3:429–451.Google Scholar
  25. —. 1992. The design and importance of longterm ecological studies: Analysis of vertebrates in the Inyo-White Mountains, California. In R.C. Szaro, K.E. Severson, and D.R. Patton (tech. coords.). Management of Amphibians, Reptiles, and Small Mammals in North America, pp. 267–275. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rpt. RM-166. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  26. Morrison, M.L., and B.G. Marcot. 1995. An evaluation of resource inventory and monitoring programs used in national forest planning. Environ. Manage. 19:147–156.Google Scholar
  27. Morrison, M.L., B.G. Marcot, and R.W. Mannan. 1998. Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and application. Second ed. Univ. Wisc. Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  28. Noon, B.R., T.A. Spies, and M.G. Raphael. 1999. Conceptual basis for designing an effectiveness monitoring program. In B.S. Mulder, B.R. Noon, T.A. Spies, M.G. Raphael, C.J. Palmer, A.R. Olsen, G.H. Reeves, and H.H. Welsh (tech. coords.). The Strategy and Design of the Effectiveness Monitoring Program in the Northwest Forest Plan, pp. 21–48. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rpt. PNW-GTR-437. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  29. Pickett, S.T.A. 1989. Space-for-time substitutions as an alternative to long-term studies. In G.E. Likens (ed.). Long-Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives, pp. 110–135. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Pielou, E.C. 1977. Mathematical Ecology, 2d ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Rinkevich, S.E., J.L. Ganey, W.H. Moir, F.P. Howe, F. Clemente, and J.F. Martinez-Montoya. 1995. Recovery units. In Recovey Plan for the Mexican Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis lucida), Vol. I, pp. 36–51. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  32. Romesburg, H.C. 1981. Wildlife science: Gaining reliable knowledge. J. Wild. Manage. 45:293–313.Google Scholar
  33. Scott, J.M., F. Davis, B. Csuti, R. Noss, B. Butterfield, C. Grives, H. Anderson, S. Caicco, F. D’Erchia, T. Edwards, Jr., J. Ulliman, and R.G. Wright. 1993. Gap analysis: A geographical approach to protection of biodiversity. Wildl. Monogr. 123.Google Scholar
  34. Shugart, H.H. 1989. The role of ecological models in long-term ecological studies. In G.E. Likens (ed.). Long-Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives, pp. 90–109. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Sokal R.R., and C.D. Michener. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 38:1409–1438.Google Scholar
  36. Sokal, R.R., and F.J. Rohlf. 1969. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  37. Sorensen, T. 1948. A method for establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content, and its applications to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskkabernes Selskab, Biloogiske Skrifter 5:1–34.Google Scholar
  38. Spellerberg, I.F. 1991. Monitoring ecological change. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Strayer, D., J.S. Glitzenstein, C.G. Jones, J. Kolasa, G. Likens, M.J. McDonnell, G.G. Parker, and S.T.A. Pickett. 1986. Long-Term Ecological Studies: An Illustrated Account of Their Design, Operation, and Importance to Ecology. Occas Pap 2. Institute for Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Swetnam, T.W. 1990. Fire history and climate in the southwestern United States. In J.S. Krammes (tech. coord.). Effects of Fire Management of Southwestern Natural Resources, pp. 6–17. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rpt. RM-191. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  41. Swetnam, T.W., and J.L. Bettancourt, 1998. Mesoscale disturbance and ecological response to decadal climatic variability in the American Southwest. J. Climate 11:3128–3147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson, S.K. 1992. Sampling. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Thompson, W.L., G.C. White, and C. Gowan. 1998. Monitoring Vertebrate Populations. Academic Pr., San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  44. USDA Forest Service. 1996. Record of Decision for Amendment of Forest Plans: Arizona and New Mexico. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  45. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. 1995. Recovery Plan for the Mexican Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis lucida), vol. I. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  46. Verner, J. 1983. An integrated system for monitoring wildlife on the Sierra Nevada Forest. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resourc. Conf. 48:355–366.Google Scholar
  47. Verner, J., M.L. Morrison, and C.J. Ralph. 1986. Wildlife 2000: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates. Univ. Wisconsin Pr., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  48. Verner, J., R.J. Guti’errez, and G.I. Gould, Jr. 1992. The California spotted owl: General biology and ecological relations. In J. Verner, K.S. McKelvey, B.R. Noon, R.J. Guti’errez, G.I. Gould, Jr., and T.W. Beck (tech. coords.). The California Spotted Owl: A Technical Assessment of Its Current Status, pp. 55–77. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rpt. PSW-GTR-133. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  49. Walters, C.J. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  50. White, G.C., and J.D. Nichols. 1992. Introduction to the methods section. In D.R. McCullough and R.H. Barrett (eds.). pp. 13–16. Wildlife 2001: Populations. Elsevier, London.Google Scholar
  51. White, G.C., W.M. Block, J.L. Ganey, W.H. Moir, J.P. Ward, Jr., A.B. Franklin, S.L. Spangle, S.E. Rinkevich, R. Vahle, F.P. Howe, and J.L. Dick, Jr. 1999. Science versus reality in delisting criteria for a threatened species: The Mexican spotted owl experience. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resourc. Conf. 64:292–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2001

Personalised recommendations