Diagnostic Epidurography and Therapeutic Epidurolysis

  • K. Dean Willis


Nerve Root Hypertonic Saline Epidural Space Filling Defect Technical Consideration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Winnie AP, Hartman JT, et al. Pain Clinic II: intradural and extradural corticosteroids for sciatica. Anesth Analg 51:990–999; 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCarron RF. Epidural fibrosis: experimental model and therapeutic alternatives. In: Techniques of Neurolysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989; 87–94.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCarron RF, Wimpee MW, et al. The inflammatory effect of the nucleus pulposus: a possible element in the pathogenesis of low back pain. Spine 12:760–764, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olmarker K, Rydevik B, et al. Pathophysiology of sciatica. Orthop Clin North Am 22:223–233, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benzon HT. Epidural steroid injection for low back pain and lumbosacral radiculopathy. Pain 24:277–295, 1986.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Racz GB, Holubec JT. Lysis of adhesions in the epidural space. In: Techniques of Neurolysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1989:57–72.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manchikanti L, Bakhit CE, et al. Role of epidurography in caudal neuroplasty. Pain Digest 8:277–281, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Racz GB, Heavner JE, et al. Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty. Prospective one-year follow up. Pain Digest 9:97–102, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heavner JE, Racz GB, et al. Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty. Prospective evaluation of 0.9% NaCl versus 10% NaCl with or without hyaluronidase. Reg Anesth Pain Med 24:202–207, 1999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manchikanti L, Pakanati R, et al. Role of adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis in management of low back pain. Evaluation of modification of the Racz protocol. Pain Digest 9:91–96, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Manchikanti L, Pampati V, et al. Non-endoscopic and endoscopic adhesiolysis in post-lumbar laminectomy syndrome. One-year outcome study and cost effective analysis. Pain Physician 2:52–58, 1999.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Manchikanti L, Pakanati RR, et al. Comparison of three routes of epidural steroid injections in low back pain. Pain Digest 9:277–285, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arthur J, Racz GB, et al. Epidural space. Identification of filling defects and lysis of adhesions in the treatment of chronic painful conditions. Abstracts, 7th Seventh World Congress on Pain. Paris: IASP Publications; 1993:557.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Devulder J, Lutgarde B, et al. Relevance of epidurography and epidural adhesiolysis in chronic failed back surgery patients. Clin J Pain 11:147–150, 1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Racz GB, Heavner JE, et al. Epidural neuroplasty. Semin Anesth 302–312, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roffe PG. Innervation of the annulus fibrosis and posterior longitudinal ligament. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 44:100, 1940.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, et al. The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica. Orthop Clin North Am 22:181–187, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Imai S, Hukuda S, et al. Innervating nociceptive networks in the rat lumbar posterior longitudinal ligaments. Spine 20:2086–2092, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nakamura S, Takahashi K, et al. Origin of nerves supplying the posterior portion of the lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 21:917–924, 1996.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anderson SR, Racz GB, et al. Evolution of epidural lysis of adhesions (review article). Pain Physician 3(3):262–270, 2000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Racz GB, Noe C, et al. Selective spinal injections for lower back pain. Curr Rev Pain 3:333–341, 1999.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Willis KD, Hassenbusch S, et al. A treatment algorithm for failed back surgery syndrome-literature reviewed and graded. Submitted Spine, 2002.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saberski LR, Kitahata LM, et al. Direct visualization of the epidural space through the sacral hiatus. Anesth Analg 80:839–840, 1995.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Racz GB, Heavner JE, et al. Lysis of epidural adhesions utilizing the epidural approach. In: Interventional Pain Management. 1st ed, Chapter 32:339–35.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Racz GB, Hammer M, et al. Double epidural catheter technique for pain management. ASR-scientific exhibition, 1997.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lewandowski EM. The efficacy of solutions used in caudal neuroplasty. Pain Digest 7:323–330, 1997.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rocco AG, Philip JH, et al. Epidural space as a Starling resistor and elevation of inflow resistance in a diseased epidural space. Reg Anesth 22:167–177, 1997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ventafridda V, Spreafico R. Subarachnoid saline perfusion. Adv Neurol 4:477–484, 1974.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aldrete JA, Zapata JC, et al. Arachnoiditis following epidural adhesiolysis with hypertonic saline. Report of two cases. Pain Digest 6:368–370, 1996.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lucas JT, Ducker TB, et al. Adverse reactions to intrathecal saline injected for control of pain. J Neurosurg 42:557, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Racz GB, Heavner JE, et al. Hypertonic saline and corticosteroid injected epidurally for pain control. In: Techniques of Neurolysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1989:73–86.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Racz GB, Haynsworth RF, et al. Experiences with an improved epidural catheter. Pain Clinic 1:21–27, 1986.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Racz GB, Hammer M, et al. Double epidural catheter technique for pain management. ASRA scientific exhibit, Atlanta 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Dean Willis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations