Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Practical Software Testing pp 537–585Cite as

The Testing Maturity Model and Test Process Assessment

  • Chapter

  • 768 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Professional Computing ((SPC))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. I. Burnstein, T. Suwanassart, and C. Carlson, “Developing a testing maturity model: part I,” CrossTalk: Journal of Defense Software Engineering. Vol. 9,No. 8, 1996, pp. 21–24

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. Burnstein, T. Suwanassart, and C. Carlson, “Developing A testing maturity model: part II,” CrossTalk: Journal of Defense Software Engineering. Vol. 9,No. 9, 1996, pp. 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. Burnstein, A. Homyen, R. Grom, C. R. Carlson, “A model for assessing testing process maturity,” CrossTalk: Journal of Department of Defense Software Engineering, Vol. 11,No. 11, Nov. 1998, pp. 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Burnstein, A. Homyen, T. Suwanassart, G. Saxena, R. Grom, “Using the testing maturity model to assess and improve your software testing process,” Proc. of International Quality Week Conf. (QW’99), San Jose, CA, May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Burnstein, A. Homyen, T, Suwanassart, G. Saxena, R. Grom, “A testing maturity model for software test process assessment and improvement,” Software Quality Professional (American Society for Quality), Vol. 1,No. 4, Sept. 1999, pp. 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Paulk, C. Weber, B. Curtis, and M. Chrissis, The Capability Maturity Model, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Software Engineering Institute, www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/publications

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Coallier, “How ISO 9001 fits into the software world,” IEEE Software, Vol. 11,No. 1, 1994, pp. 98–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Bicego, P. Kuvaja, “BOOTSTRAP: Europe’s assessment method,” IEEE Software, Vol. 10,No. 3, 1993, pp. 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Paulk, M. Konrad, “An overview of ISO’s SPICE project,” American Programmer, Vol. 7,No. 2, 1994, pp. 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis, and C. Weber. “Capability maturity model, version 1.1,” IEEE Software, Vol. 10,No. 4, 1993, pp. 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Paulk, C. Weber, S. Garcia, M. Chrissis, and M. Bush, “ Key practices of the capability maturity model, version 1.1,” Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-25, 1993, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Gelperin, B. Hetzel, “The growth of software testing,” Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery, Vol. 31,No. 6, 1988, pp. 687–695.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Durant, “ Software testing practices survey report,” Technical Report, TR5-93, Software Practices Research Center, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Beizer, Software Testing Techniques, second edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Gelperin, A. Hayashi, “How to support better software testing,” Application Trends, May 1996, pp. 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Gelperin, “What’s your testability maturity?” Application Trends, May 1996, pp. 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Koomen, M. Pol, “ Improvement of the test process using TPI,” Technical Report, IQUIP Informatica B.V., Diemen, The Netherlands, 1998, http://www.iquip.nl.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. Koomen, M. Pol, Test Process Improvement, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Clouse, C. Wells, “Transitioning from EIA/IS-731 to CMMI,” CrossTalk: Journal of Department of Defense Software Engineering, Vol. 13,No. 7, July 2000, pp. 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Shrum, “Choosing a CMMI model representation,” CrossTalk: Journal of Department of Defense Software Engineering, Vol. 13,No. 7, July 2000, pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO/IEC Software Process Assessment Working Draft-Part 3: Rating processes, version 1.00; Part 5: Construction, selection and use of assessment instruments and tools, version 1.00; Part 7: Guide for use in process improvement, version 1.00, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Zubrow, W. Hayes, J. Siegel, D. Goldenson, “ Maturity questionnaire,” Technical Report, CMU/SEI-94-SR-7, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Masters, C. Bothwell, “ A CMM appraisal framework, version 1.0,” Technical Report, CMU/SEI-95-TR-001, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Homyen, “ An assessment model to determine test process maturity,” Ph.D. thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Hearns, S. Garcia, “Automated test team management—it works!” Proc. of the 10th Software Eng. Process Group Conference (SEPG’98), 6–9 March, Chicago, IL, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  27. W. Humphrey, W. Sweet, “ A method for assessing the software engineering capability of contractors,” Technical Report, CMU/SEI-87-TR-23, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Puffer, A. Litter, “Action planning,” IEEE Software Engineering Technical Council Newsletter, Vol. 15,No. 2, 1997, pp. 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Grom, “ Report on a TMM assessment support tool,” Technical Report, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. Cook, M. Visconti, “ New and improved documentation model,” Technical Report, Oregon State University, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. K. El Emam, D. Goldenson, L. Briand, P. Marshall, “Interrater agreement in SPICE-based assessments: some preliminary reports,” Proc. Fourth International Conference on the Software Process, Brighton, UK, 1996, pp. 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Saxena, “ A framework for building and evaluating process maturity models,” Ph.D. thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Weszka, P. Babel, J. Ferguson, “CMMI: evolutionary path to enterprise process improvement,” CrossTalk: Journal of Department of Defense Software Engineering, Vol. 13,No. 7, July 2000, pp. 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  34. CMMI Product Development Team, “CMMI for systems engineering/software engineering, version 1.02 (CMMI-SE/SW, V1.02) staged representation,” Technical Report, CMU/SEI-2000TR-018, ESC-TR-2000-018, Software Engineering Institute, Nov. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  35. D. Kitson, “An emerging international standard for software process assessment,” Proc. IEEE Third International Software Engineering Standards Symposium and Forum, Walnut Creek, CA, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  36. S. Garcia, “Evolving improvement paradigms: Capability Maturity Models and ISO/IEC 15504 (PDTR),” Software Process Improvement and Practice, Vol. 3,No. 1, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  37. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), “ISO/IEC 12207: Information Technology-Software Life Cycle Processes,” 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. Moore, “ ISO 12207 and related software life cycle standards,” http://www.acm.org.tsc/lifecycle.html.

  39. R. Kehoe, A. Jarvis, ISO-9000-3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  40. I. Burnstein, T. Suwanassart, private correspondence, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. Hook, “ Evaluation of the TMM questionnaire,” Technical Report, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  42. K. Olsen, P. Stall Vinje, “ Using the testing maturity model in practical test-planning and postevaluation,” EuroSTAR98 Conference, Munich, Germany, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  43. I. Burnstein, L. Miller (President, Midwest Software Testing Lab, Inc.), private correspondence, 2000–2001.

    Google Scholar 

  44. H. Tran, “ A procedure on how to conduct a testing maturity assessment on a software development organization using the TMM assessment methodology,” M.S. thesis, University of Minnesota, Rochester, MN, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  45. L. Zells, “Learning from Japanese TQM applications to software engineering,” Total Qualty Managment for Software, G. Schulmeyer, J. McManus, eds., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  46. K. El Emam, B. Shostak, N. Madhavji, “Implementing concepts from the personal software process in an industrial setting,” Proc. Fourth International Conference on the Software Process, Improvement, and Practice, Brighton, UK, 1996, pp. 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2003). The Testing Maturity Model and Test Process Assessment. In: Practical Software Testing. Springer Professional Computing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21658-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21658-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95131-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21658-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation