Skip to main content

Landscape Disturbance

Location, Pattern, and Dynamics

  • Chapter
Book cover Learning Landscape Ecology

Conclusions

The preceding exercises have demonstrated how the initiation of disturbance can be affected by landscape position, how disturbances create pattern and dynamics on landscapes, and how spatial and temporal scale influences whether a landscape is equilibrial. You’ve also seen the wide range of vari-ability in natural disturbance regimes and the difficulty in setting reference conditions for a disturbance. Either explicitly or implicitly, each of these ex-amples also illustrates the potential importance of humans in governing dis-turbance dynamics. The first example showed how the use of the landscape for purposes seemingly unrelated to the disturbance in question can influence the pattern of disturbance (e.g., roads influencing the initiation of fires). Di-rect use of the landscape for forest harvest can also substantially alter land-scape patterns. In the last example, the parameters S and T were used to es-timate how human-induced changes in a disturbance regime (e.g., alteration of disturbance size or frequency) might push the landscape into regions of dif-ferent behavior. Humans might alter the size of the disturbance relative to the size of the landscape (S) by either altering the extent of fire or by altering the extent of the landscape itself (through land conversion and fragmentation). Furthermore, humans could alter landscape disturbance by burning or cutting areas larger than might otherwise be disturbed. The recovery time of the dis-turbance relative to the recovery time of the vegetation (T) can also be altered by humans—by initiating disturbance more frequently through altering the frequency of fires or frequency of harvests. Thus, humans can influence the spatial and temporal dynamics of disturbance, creating another layer of com-plexity in addition to the natural variability in disturbance dynamics, which should not be ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Attiwill, P. M. 1994. The disturbance of forest ecosystems: The ecological basis for conservative management. Forest Ecology and Management 63:247–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. L. 1989. Landscape ecology and nature reserve design in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota. Ecology 70:23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boose, E. R., D. R. Foster, and M. Fluet. 1994. Hurricane impacts to tropical and temperate forest landscapes. Ecological Monographs 64:369–400. Uses empirical data and modeling to examine the sensitivity of different landscape positions to hurricane effects in New England (USA) and Puerto Rico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgan, R. E., and R. A. Hartford. 1988. Computer mapping of fire danger and fire locations in the continental United States. Journal of Forestry 86:25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardille, J. A., S. J. Ventura, and M. G. TURNER. 2001. Environmental and social factors influencing wildfires in the Upper Midwest, USA. Ecological Applications 11(1):111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, Y. H., R. A. Minnich, and R. A. Chase. 1993. Mapping probability of fire occurrence in San Jacinto Mountains, California, USA. Environmental Management 17:129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. J., and F. C. Evans. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35(4): 445–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, V. H., A. E. Lugo, J. Macmahon, and S. T. A Pickett. 1998. Ecosystem management in the context of large disturbances. Ecosystems 1:546–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delong, S. C., and D. Tanner. 1996. Managing the pattern of forest harvest: Lessons from wildfire. Biodiversity and Conservation 5:1191–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. R. 1988a. Disturbance history, community organization and vegetation dynamics of the old-growth Pisgah Forest, southwestern New Hampshire, USA. Journal of Ecology 76:105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. R. 1988b. Species and stand response to catastrophic wind in central New England, USA. Journal of Ecology 76:135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. R., D. H. Knight, and J. F. Franklin. 1998. Landscape patterns and legacies resulting from large infrequent forest disturbances. Ecosystems 1:497–510. Focuses on disturbances in forest landscapes and provides a nice comparison of the variety of spatial patterns introduced by large, infrequent disturbances and their persistent effects on the landscape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F., and R. T. T. Forman. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology 1:5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, H. W., and G. F. Tande. 1983. A regional approach to fire history in Alaska. BLM-Alaska Technical Report 9. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Anchorage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, E. J., and T. R. Crow. 1996. Simulating the effects of alternative forest management strategies on landscape structure. Journal of Environmental Management 46:77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habeck, J. R., and R. W. Mutch. 1973. Fire-dependent forests in the northern Rockies. Quaternary Research 3:408–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S, and G. K. Meffe. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10: 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. L. Jr. 1993. Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests. Biological Conservation 65:115–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krummel, J. R., R. H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, R. V. O’Neill, and P. R. Coleman. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48:321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landres, P. B., P. Morgan, and F. J. Swanson. 1999. Overview of the use of natural variability concepts in managing ecological systems. Ecological Applications 9:1179–1188. This paper is part of a Special Feature of Ecological Applications and provides an excellent overview of the concept of historic range of variation; interested readers are encouraged also to read the other papers published in this Special Feature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., J. F. Franklin, F. J. Swanson, and T. A. Spies. 1993. Developing alternative forest cutting patterns: A simulation approach. Landscape Ecology 8:63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K., and B. J. Marks. 1995. FRAGSTATS. Spatial analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff, D. J., M. A. White, J. Pastor, and T. R. Crow. 1993. Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes for biodiversity design and management. Ecological Applications 3:293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, D. J., T. W. Swetnam, and N. L. Christensen. 1999. Uses and limitations of historical variability concepts in managing ecosystems. Ecological Applications 9:1177–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A., and P. S. White, eds. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser, P. G., J. R. Karr, and R. T. T. Forman. 1984. Landscape ecology: Directions and approaches. Special Pub. No. 2. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme, W. H. 1982. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Monographs 52:199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme, W. H., and D. H. Knight. 1982. Landscape diversity: The concept applied to Yellowstone Park. BioScience 32:664–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runkle, J. R. 1991. Gap dynamics of old-growth eastern forests: Management implications. Natural Areas Journal 11:19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H. H. Jr., and D. C. West. 1981. Long-term dynamics of forest ecosystems. American Scientist 69:647–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker, D. B., W. H. Romme, and D. G. Despain. Historic range of variability in landscape structure in subalpine forests of the Greater Yellowstone Area. Manuscript in review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., ed. 1987. Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., and V. H. Dale. 1998. Comparing large, infrequent disturbances: What have we learned? Introduction for special feature. Ecosystems 1:493–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., V. H. Dale, and E. E. Everham III. 1997. Fires, hurricanes and volcanoes: Comparing large-scale disturbances. BioScience 47:758–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., R. H. Gardner, V. H. Dale, and R. V. O’Neill. 1989. Predicting the spread of disturbance across heterogeneous landscapes. Oikos 55:121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., and W. H. Romme. 1994. Landscape dynamics in crown fire ecosystems. Landscape Ecology 9:59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., W. H. Romme, R. H. Gardner, R. V. O’Neill, and T. K. Kratz. 1993. A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: Disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8:213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, A. S. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. Journal of Ecology 35:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. S., and S. T. A. Pickett. 1985. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: An introduction. In S. T. A. Pickett and P. S. White, eds. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York, pp. 3–13. This Chapter does an excellent job of defining disturbance and its various attributes. The rest of the book provides good examples of disturbance from a variety of systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu., J., and O. L. Loucks. 1995. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology 70:439–466. Provides a comprehensive and thoughtful treatment of how patch dynamics are considered across a wide range of scales. This is a “must read” for those interested in scale-dependent dynamics and the effects of disturbance on landscapes.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Turner, M.G., Tinker, D.B., Gergel, S.E., Chapin, F.S. (2002). Landscape Disturbance. In: Gergel, S.E., Turner, M.G. (eds) Learning Landscape Ecology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21613-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21613-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95254-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21613-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics